Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT 22-26 August 2011 (1996-2000)
TheCollector:
--- Quote from: jwhouk on 26 Aug 2011, 18:57 ---
--- Quote from: TheCollector on 26 Aug 2011, 18:43 ---
--- Quote from: jwhouk on 26 Aug 2011, 18:19 ---I think Marigold got her the current getup she has after she "bought" her, since her first one was a kimono. She looks better with the "schoolgirl" look.
--- End quote ---
Kimono? What? When was this?
--- End quote ---
[http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1298]When we first meet Momo[/url] (1298, 702 strips ago).
--- End quote ---
Huh, what do ya know. I remember that now. Especially the disturbing eel line.
But yeah, I like the schoolgirl look better on her. Little her. Big her, once again, Porn.
But man, I wish QC updated on the weekends too. I hate having to wait all that time to possibly see more new Momo.
TinPenguin:
Warning - while you were typing 6 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Despite it now being 3am, I had to satisfy my own curiosity, and so did an archive-dive to find out Momo has only ever appeared in the kimono in 2 strips (from a total of 44 appearances) - 1298 and 1366. By the time of her 3rd appearance, in 1411, she has changed to the schoolgirl outfit.
akronnick:
Well it's just an outfit, Maybe she came with the kimono, and at some point She and/or Marigold decided the schoolgirl outfit was a better choice.
Kugai:
Actually, considering that Marigold is actually a 'Techie' (wasn't that mentioned as her profession at one stage?) it wouldn't surprise me that she can afford the expense of the new Chassis for Momo. It'll probably mean she'll have to take on more work, but considering the kind of charges a self employed tech expert of Mairgolds ability could charge, I wouldn't be surprised if she can afford it in the long run.
Somebody:
--- Quote from: jwhouk on 26 Aug 2011, 18:57 ---When we first meet Momo (1298, 702 strips ago).
--- End quote ---
Wait, if Momo was the newest model then, and she's 2 years & 8 months old now (per #1995), does that mean a couple of years have passed in the past 700 strips? I know there's a couple of time jumps in there, but the idea that QC even approaches "real time" Does Not Compute.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version