Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT: 2001-2005 (29 Aug-2 Sept 2011)
starkruzr:
--- Quote from: pwhodges on 02 Sep 2011, 02:04 ---
--- Quote from: guayec on 02 Sep 2011, 01:54 ---Is it a banned topic to avoid extreme creepiness?
--- End quote ---
It is not a banned subject, but would not get a free pass on creepiness either.
--- End quote ---
Well, Momo's fantasized about Sven. There has to be context. It must have happened before and probably isn't all that rare, either.
The question is, how realistic can it be for the human? How satisfying can it be for the android? What does "satisfying" MEAN to an android in the context of sex?
I suppose their programming could include a whole set of behaviors/responses to sexual stimuli, and it's quite likely that someone has figured out pheromone interaction capabilities between humans and androids. But even after you handle the mechanics of it... the contexts are completely different. Aren't they?
Is it cold in here?:
Marten found the idea "profoundly disturbing" in 1667.
bramblepatch:
--- Quote from: Is it cold in here? on 02 Sep 2011, 16:50 ---Marten found the idea "profoundly disturbing" in 1667.
--- End quote ---
And Pintsize was "glad they legalized human/robot makeouts" in 1900, although I'm not entirely sure whether that would indicate a) that there is a following for such things or b) that it's one of those things Pintsize, and only Pintsize, is into.
Carl-E:
Rule 34. There's always a followng.
St.Clair:
DON'T DATE ROBOTS!
(approved by the Space Pope)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version