Fun Stuff > CHATTER

Photos can be pretty cool

<< < (636/687) > >>

Aziraphale:

--- Quote from: hedgie on 01 Dec 2014, 03:02 ---
--- Quote from: Aziraphale on 30 Nov 2014, 12:35 ---
--- Quote from: Akima on 28 Nov 2014, 14:02 ---
--- Quote from: Kugai on 17 Nov 2014, 21:15 ---No Ravens?
--- End quote ---
Spooky shot. It would look so much more threatening with vertical verticals, but how many of us have access to a shift-lens or camera with movements?

--- End quote ---

I've thought about a 24mm shift lens (or adapter). I tried fixing the verticals in post and it actually kinda lost something.

--- End quote ---
If you can afford it, it's totally worth it.  Not only can you deal with keystoning, but you can really do a lot with selective focus.  If I could afford a digital back for my 4"x5" cameras I'd totally do it.

--- End quote ---

I'd be using it more for perspective correction than selective focus, though I'd probably end up experimenting with that, too. The only issue is the price. 1700-2000 bucks or thereabouts for the Nikon mount. I could rent, but the problem with that kind of lens (versus renting, say, a 24-70 2.8 ) is that I'd imagine there's a bit of a learning curve involved... meaning I'd be getting the hang of it just in time to send it back, and then would have to relearn the next time I rented. I do shoot a fair amount of architecture and some interiors, so it's tempting (I can also see where it might be useful for certain types of macro/tabletop work), but I'd have to seriously consider how often I'd use it given the cost. I even looked at LensBaby, but I need the shift -- and good optics -- more than the tilt, and I don't want my stuff looking like it was done on some hipster's duct-taped Holga.

Patrick:








There's so much beauty in the SF Bay Area and it's even better from a bird's eye view.

Patrick:
...I don't know why the last one is a schematic, that is definitely not what I uploaded.

Anyway,

cesium133:

--- Quote from: Patrick on 01 Dec 2014, 15:31 ---...I don't know why the last one is a schematic, that is definitely not what I uploaded.

--- End quote ---
I had thought you meant to point out the typo in it. I was going to respond with this page from our dye laser manual:

jwhouk:

--- Quote from: ankhtahr on 01 Dec 2014, 06:19 ---I received my share of our Fatfox group buy.

Context: A loosely organised group of people I'm part of (mainly members of an IRC channel about our university), has discovered an amazing series of plush animals, amongst them a very, very round fox, now dubbed Fatfox by us. It has turned into a meme in the IRC channel around a year ago, and now we made another group buy. I finally have my very own fatfoxes! They also introduced a new fatfox with large pupils, dubbed drugfox by us.

Here is my new fatfox family:



--- End quote ---

Squishables FTW.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version