Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT 2056-2060; Nov. 14-18, 2011
Tova:
Except he wanted to go?
Actually, he wasn't moping about being invited; he was moping about his lack of dancing ability.
jwhouk:
On a different tangent altogether (pauses for people to say "On a different tangent")...
Notice that the only LTR's we have had so far in our storyline had, as the post-consummation strip, nudity?
Think about it: Dora and Marten's first strip didn't feature the two of them nekkid after their sexy times. Neither did Faye and Sven. We never saw Raven get nekkid with any of her Benjis. And you can just forget about Hannelore.
However, Faye and Angus did get nekkid afterwards, as did Wil and Penelope. They're still together as of this writing.
Maybe Jeph isn't doing it intentionally, but I'm thinking that he does draw a couple he doesn't plan on making into a LTR either clothed or covered up by sheets/whatever after they "do the deed."
Dr. ROFLPWN:
--- Quote from: Tova on 17 Nov 2011, 19:22 ---Except he wanted to go?
Actually, he wasn't moping about being invited; he was moping about his lack of dancing ability.
--- End quote ---
...Oh God, he was. :psyduck: He was complaining because he was afraid he'd do something to look unattractive in the eyes of the girl he's attracted to. Which confirms my wild crackpot theory that he was attracted to Padma the entire time! JEEPERS.
Heeeeeere's another thing to consider-- while it sounds like Padma wants nothing further to do with Marty after what she said to Elliot, remember that this is filtered through Elliot, a man she is explicitly unattracted to with whom her relationship right now is somewhere between Awkward and Soul-Destroyingly Awkward. What if part of the reason she sounds so thoroughly blow-off-ish is because she doesn't want said enormous looming idiot to get the wrong idea, or thinks he's making passive-aggressive jabs at her ("why don't you go fuck Marten then?!" could have easily been what she heard, not "I think you should have a nice time with this boy you clearly like").
AnAverageWriter:
--- Quote from: Tova on 17 Nov 2011, 19:18 ---Just because I didn't quote it all, doesn't mean I didn't read it all. And I wasn't 'baffled'
--- End quote ---
And I quote: "How you managed to draw that conclusion from the post pwhodges made is totally beyond my comprehension."
I love people who pretend they can't read a post. PW clearly stated that he didn't "believe there was any intent to troll"- that the ban was a result instead of "repeated expression of unacceptable sexist views". This would mean that stoutfiles was banned for the entirely unintentional occurrence of having views (the "unacceptable sexist views") that differed significantly from the viewpoint of the group.
--- Quote --- there was no justification for your post.
--- End quote ---
You know, it makes sense to me now that a muppet would be your main avatar.
Tova:
--- Quote from: AnAverageWriter on 17 Nov 2011, 19:36 ---I love people who pretend they can't read a post. PW clearly stated that he didn't "believe there was any intent to troll"- that the ban was a result instead of "repeated expression of unacceptable sexist views". This would mean that stoutfiles was banned for the entirely unintentional occurrence of having views (the "unacceptable sexist views") that differed significantly from the viewpoint of the group.
--- End quote ---
/sigh
He was banned because his views were unacceptably sexist, not because they were different.
It's not complicated.
And, I forgot to add, repeated in spite of knowing they were inflammatory.
And other reasons we don't know about.
Final edit, this time for sure: Oh and he's not a muppet, he's a WOMBLE. Sheesh. Where's your knowledge of the classics? ;p
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version