Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT 2066-2070; Nov. 28-Dec. 2, 2011
Paranoid:
I think given Elliot's comments about being able to put Faye in a sleeper hold has lead most of us to accept that he is indeed a bouncer. It's not 100% irrevocable proof, but combined with the One Steve Limit* rule it looks to be a fairly safe bet.
*Disclaimer: you know where this link leads. Enter at your own risk. :evil:
pwhodges:
I deliberately did not link that rule.
A recent case where it was (presumably deliberately) broken was in Scott Pilgrim, where there is a second (minor) character called Scott - referred to by Scott as "other Scott".
CrowFairy:
I would really like to see for sure if Elliot is the same bouncer or not. Perhaps he could hear of what happened between Marten and Padma and then kind of take it out on the unruly patrons? Whether we see it or not is unimportant--him talking about it would be plenty for me.
cesariojpn:
--- Quote from: pwhodges on 26 Nov 2011, 14:50 ---So it would seem - but I don't think we've had any corroboration that this is the same Elliot(t).
--- End quote ---
I was being random. Like.
celticgeek:
--- Quote from: Paranoid on 26 Nov 2011, 17:13 ---I think given Elliot's comments about being able to put Faye in a sleeper hold has lead most of us to accept that he is indeed a bouncer. It's not 100% irrevocable proof, but combined with the One Steve Limit* rule it looks to be a fairly safe bet.
*Disclaimer: you know where this link leads. Enter at your own risk. :evil:
--- End quote ---
"This is my brother Darryl and this is my other brother Darryl."
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version