Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

You're A Good Man, Marten Reed

<< < (8/10) > >>

DSL:
'Swhat I read once I got past the post's pseudointellectual, dismissive tone. We can disagree, that's fine. As I said, I wasn't going for academic rigor and am kinda disappointed (but not surprised) that a bit of fun took this turn.

LoveJaneAusten:

--- Quote from: DSL on 30 Nov 2011, 13:59 ---I thought the main thrust of LJA's post was a straw man argument -- that there was an attempt to create an exact, character-for-character correlation between Peanuts and QC.

--- End quote ---

That isn't really at all what I wrote. You've posted twice now that you don't want to think too hard about this, but I don't think it's out of line to ask that you read what people actually post. Don't get a tummy-ache because someone disagreed with your premise!

Tova:

--- Quote from: DSL on 30 Nov 2011, 20:15 ---'Swhat I read once I got past the post's pseudointellectual, dismissive tone.

--- End quote ---

I'm sorry to say that your tone is way more dismissive than LoveJaneAusten's ever was.

I agree with you on being disappointed in the turn the thread's taken, but perhaps not on who caused it.

Is it cold in here?:
(moderator)
Ahem.
(/moderator)

QC does more wordplay, and I think Marten has more successes in life than Charlie Brown.

akronnick:
That's only because Marten gave up sports when he was in grade school.

Charlie Brown is still trying in that field of endeavor.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page