Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCDT 2076-2080 (Dec. 12-16, 2011)

<< < (50/57) > >>

Vista:
I prefer the interpretation that Elliot is high-fiving Marten because he isn't wearing pants.

Marchbanks:

--- Quote from: Mr_Rose on 16 Dec 2011, 12:38 ---In fact I have no idea how they are supposed to be related beyond having slightly the same shade of hair, which could just mean they favour the same brand of dye.

--- End quote ---

If anything, and even this is a stretch, she looks a bit like a henna'd Penelope--not that I think Penelope has suddenly developed a passion for henna.

Mr_Rose:
Indeed. Just checked back and the girl many people are calling "sweet tits" last appeared intone first two panels of 2031 and has noticeably more red in her hair. Oh, and has a completely different facial structure. Also a book on bird care.

jwhouk:

--- Quote from: Near Lurker on 16 Dec 2011, 12:17 ---
--- Quote from: Carl-E on 16 Dec 2011, 11:23 ---Extras take their time to settle in.  We've been seeing a lot of the little redheaded girl lately (no, I am not  calling her Sweet-tits, they really don't look the same), but aside from her I think Jeph just has a pallette of types he uses.

--- End quote ---

This one doesn't look like Sweet-Tits because she isn't.  Sweet-Tits shows up sometimes, and this girl's never been seen before.

--- End quote ---

Actually, she has... although I think today's girl has "bigger" glasses.

Sidhekin:
... and longer hair.

Neither is conclusive; I've personally got four pairs of "good" glasses, and the art is really not consistent enough that I'd trust length of hair as an identifying feature.

But on the other hand, there's not really much going for them being the same either.  Same face, same body, same dye ... oh, and glasses and generally the same hairstyle ...

... now why am I even arguing this? :-\

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version