Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT: 2131-35 (27 Feb- 2 Mar 2012) QC IN SPAAAAAACE! Week 6
JRDelirio:
The "public" thing about her picture may be referring to it being published among her circle of friends -- probably the bunch of classmates that got drunk at that party went ahead and posted en masse on each others' FB Walls. As we've said before, the RL AF Academy surely has strict rules against doing things like that, but not the one in the QC world. But within the plot it's pretty much forced to have her be stupidly careless about her FB privacy, since the alternative would be to make Station even more jerkish and violatory by reaching into private material for purposes of "outing" her.
And yeah, cash settlements indeed are often just "shut up and go away" money, not satisfaction.
Carl-E:
--- Quote from: Nathanyel on 28 Feb 2012, 04:11 ---Btw, what is she holding in panel 1? Could be a wallet in the right hand, but that other thing..
--- End quote ---
She's changing the power supply on the virtual wine bottle for the party this evening.
Deadlywonky:
could be a rifle of some sort (she is in the military) but it lacks a pistol grip, however the item in her hand looks like the same size as a magazine and looks like it goes in the same place. might be a laser rifle :-o
jwhouk:
What's up for us this week?
Back Down To Earth. - 1 (1.5%)
A Bit More HannerDrama. - 18 (27.7%)
More QC: The Musical! - 2 (3.1%)
Lt. Potter's secret: She's always wanted to be a Barista! - 1 (1.5%)
...or a Librarian! - 4 (6.2%)
Focus on Angus & Faye. - 0 (0%)
What Momo & Winslow were doing... - 2 (3.1%)
Marten's Dad - THE WEDDING ARC! - 2 (3.1%)
Shebly Comics! - 3 (4.6%)
SPATHE HAM! - 6 (9.2%)
Whatever it is, we're just here for the party. - 26 (40%)
Total Voters: 65
zmeiat_joro:
--- Quote from: Westrim on 28 Feb 2012, 00:49 ---Question: can something without a gender (appearances aside) commit sexual harassment, legally?
--- End quote ---
That's a pretty ciscentric thing to say. And that's all I can say about it. I don't really get why you would think sexual harrasment has anything to do with gender.
Unrelated note, what makes you think Station has no legal gender?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version