Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT: 2151-55 (26-30 Mar 2012) QC IN SPAAAAAACE... Week TEN!?!
Mr_Rose:
--- Quote from: FunkyTuba on 30 Mar 2012, 08:51 ---
--- Quote from: calmcalamity on 30 Mar 2012, 02:49 ---
--- Quote from: FunkyTuba on 30 Mar 2012, 00:44 ---Welp, I kinda figured Station would make a move. Didn't know if it was going to be Potter or Hanners, now I've got my answer.
--- End quote ---
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT!?
What indication gave you even a hint that this was coming, 'cause to me this was about as unexpected as an immaculate conception.
--- End quote ---
Well, I guess I sensed that Station had a thing for Hanners when she made him apologize to Potter, plus he "was the only one who could get through to her" when she had her profound OCD problems.
As for Potter, before Jeph showed us her full character, I was half-expecting her to fall for Station, instead they just went on a drunken rampage.
On top of all this, Jeph is obviously interested in AI-human interaction/rights/etc so... yeah, I figured.
--- End quote ---
Huh, weird. I'm actually genuinely surprised there are people who didn't see this coming… Station has been transparently into Hanners basically from the moment he first spoke as far as I'm concerned. Even the way he used his hologram to separate Hanners from the other two as he was giving the tour screams "back off, she's mine!" to me, even if it is a human reaction Station would have to have learned from watching the researchers etc. But yeah, the way he reacted to being told to apologise to Lt. Potter just sealed the deal.
StevenC:
--- Quote from: Is it cold in here? on 31 Mar 2012, 12:16 ---Yes. Complete agreement that therapists should not get involved with patients. That's what bothered me most.
--- Quote from: alienatedduck on 31 Mar 2012, 00:52 ---The creepiest thing in this entire universe is robots with feelings.
BUT CAN THEY EVER TRULY LEARN TO LOVE?
--- End quote ---
There's a thread about that, in fact. http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php?topic=27240.0
--- End quote ---
Former. As in what, 10+ years ago?
Carl-E:
The first post in that thread is a little over a year old, the last one was in December. It was instigated my the "Momo's new chassis" arc.
Take a look at it before judging...
WAYF:
I think perhaps he was referring to the therapist/patient relationship being a former relationship from 10+ years ago, not the thread being 10 years old. :D
Carl-E:
Oh.
Yeah.
Damn.
In other news...
I'm wondering a bit. Someone mentioned earlier that Station may just be wanting to catch up with Hanners, his response to the "date" question was "In a manner of speaking, yes".
So it's kind of a date. Sort of a date. But not really a date.
Especially since the other party is leaving in a flurry of misunderstanding...
I guess we'll find out on Monday... or not. Prolly just get yelled at again.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version