Fun Stuff > CHATTER

English is weird

<< < (45/240) > >>

pwhodges:
Put it all down to the quaint charm of the language; I wouldn't have it any other way - but then, why should I?

People have tried at many times and in many ways to regularise the language, mostly concentrating on spelling, and usually with little lasting effect; perhaps the most effective deliberately planned change was Webster's removal of the u from colour etc - but even that had only somewhat local effect.

Is it cold in here?:
"A scissors" is not unheard of: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/scissors. I never heard it in any of the US places I've lived.

There's no way a language could be internally consistent with as mixed a history as English has.

Redball:

--- Quote from: pwhodges on 04 Mar 2013, 16:14 ---Put it all down to the quaint charm of the language; I wouldn't have it any other way - but then, why should I?
... but even that had only somewhat local effect.

--- End quote ---
That's a sly one! But I agree with the quaint charm.

Carl-E:
I think the use of "pair" with these plurals just reinforces them.  The "lack" of a singular is just that we don't see / use them.  If you split your pants far enough, you'll get a trouse; when the scissors break, you have a scis.  And this one - a single lens in a frame is a "glass", as in a magnifying glass.  So that one does work... but that's only one. 

idontunderstand:
And if you say "a couple of glasses" that would be four lenses, right?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version