Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT: 2256-60 (20-24 August 2012) Weekly Comics Discussion Thread
idontunderstand:
I guess you're right but it still looks fucking weird!
lepetitfromage:
Perhaps Dora's last girlfriend was more feminine and thus, more her Dad's taste. I think her faux pas may be related to the fact that (as MartenMom put it) Tai's a "tiny butch one".
Of course, there are more eloquent ways of explaining this to Tai, but.....where's the humor in that? Let's just hope Dora can clear things up and Tai can overlook her misstep. Then again....tomorrow IS Friday, so I'm not counting on a resolution quite yet.
DSL:
Were I Tai (and I'm not) I might take offense less to what Dora said than by the casual, distracted, almost dismissive way she said it -- a touch of the "other people don't really exist" vibe I've picked up from our not-quite-ex-Goth caffeinator in strips past.
Tai is realizing the danger in idealizing/idolizing someone: It's a pedestal that can be undermined by the slightest imperfection, and the fall is longer and the crash is louder than they really have any business being.
That said, I'm not betting on a blowup just yet; I've noted before a history in QC of setups for "shit's gonna go down" situations only to have it bypassed in the next day's strip (and then surface hundreds of strips later, as the flame finally reaches the other end of the fuse).
jwhouk:
Given the two women that Peter Bianchi seems to adore (Elssa and Veronica Vance-Reed), I think it's rather obvious what she really meant.
Hint: "Eyes up here" will never likely be uttered by Tai.
Carl-E:
So, "tall" is a euphemism for big boobs?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version