Fun Stuff > CHATTER

Good logo? Bad logo?

(1/3) > >>

pwhodges:
The UK's leading cancer research charity is changing its logo:

Old logo:

New logo:

The old logo declares what it is.  The new logo is supposed to represent the way in which they bring together supporters, scientists, doctors, and nurses in the fight against cancer.

I'm not impressed.

TinPenguin:
The old logo was a good, recognisable logo, well-established, well-embedded in people's consciousness. There was no need to change it.

It seems that most logo designers these days don't even understand the fundamental rules of their craft.

Welu:
It seems rather cluttered, not sure how it would look at the top of a letter or something. If they wanted to condense it I think the dotted arrow would be recognisable by itself by now.

BeoPuppy:
I like the idea of the second one. It's a good concept. I just don't know whether they really should go with a big C.

Carl-E:
Yeah, "the big C" was the first thing that came to my mind, but only because I knew it was for cancer research ahead of time.  Making the dots of the arrow into people probably would have worked better. 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page