Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCDT: 2338-2342 (10-14 December 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread

<< < (24/55) > >>

Is it cold in here?:

--- Quote from: Akima on 12 Dec 2012, 04:39 ---
--- Quote from: 2ndSequence on 12 Dec 2012, 03:39 ---Such a disgusting craving to play Final Fantasy with all these references in the recent weeks...

--- End quote ---
Pintsize was dented but still coherent after Faye dismembered and Marigold thumped him, but one blow from Emily knocked him into a spiral. Does she do karate or something? Generate EMP when hurt?

--- End quote ---

Neither Marigold nor The Pugnacious Peach hit him hard enough to injure their hands. This may be a new level of impact.

How will Marigold react? She is sensitive to AnthroPC abuse, but may have made a permanent exception for Pintsize.

Is it cold in here?:

--- Quote from: Y on 12 Dec 2012, 08:59 ---
--- Quote from: DSL on 12 Dec 2012, 05:51 ---One suspects the damage is cumulative, even if he appears to recover.

--- End quote ---

How much more damage would Pintsize's chassis be able to take? I remember they replaced his chassis before too, but would Marten be able to afford it on his salary or would Pintsize end up in Momo's old chassis temporarily?

--- End quote ---

The current one is mil-spec, and Marigold mentioned on Twitter once that the dents pop right out.

westrim:

--- Quote from: Is it cold in here? on 12 Dec 2012, 12:06 ---Neither Marigold nor The Pugnacious Peach hit him hard enough to injure their hands. This may be a new level of impact.

--- End quote ---
The Third Impact, if you will.

Pilchard123:

--- Quote from: Is it cold in here? on 12 Dec 2012, 12:06 ---Neither Marigold nor The Pugnacious Peach hit him hard enough to injure their hands. This may be a new level of impact.

--- End quote ---

They may have been more prepared for hitting a hard object. You punch soft thing differently to hard things.


--- Quote from: snubnose on 12 Dec 2012, 00:38 ---f(0) := 0
f(1) := 1
f(n) := f(n-1)+f(n-2), n >= 2

--- End quote ---

I know that's pretty much the definition of that sequence, but it's also one of the (if not the) slowest known algorithms for generating a the Fibonacci sequence. IIRC, it also uses a lot more storage than other methods as well.

Skewbrow:
So glad that you brought this up. Here is a link to a relevant Q&A in my favorite social media for math nerd(ette)s. A much faster method is described there.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version