Fun Stuff > CHATTER

Mafia 3 - Under the Moon

<< < (24/64) > >>

J:
problem is that we don't even know what the odds are or what the rolls might be.

henri bemis:

--- Quote from: de_la_Nae on 10 Jan 2013, 18:03 ---The sound of glass bottles being clinked together rings out in the night, accompanied by a taunting voice.

"Murderers...come out and plaaaaaaaaay..."

--- End quote ---

I can dig that.  *rollerskates around the village with a baseball bat*

I'm honestly glad neither of our two suspects got killed today.  Ties aren't viable in the long-run, but I'm not all that interested in helping the whateverevilfucks in their mission any more than we have to.  They will kill someone innocent every night, regardless of what we do during the day.  We will have to make judgements.  But I don't think it hurts us much that we didn't today.

Game and Watch Forever:

--- Quote from: riccostar on 10 Jan 2013, 18:53 ---Alright, opinion on tying votes here.
--- End quote ---

You put it really well, ricco. And I agree on some of your points. But let me put it this way... if you see de_la_Nae and Linds as potential lynch victims and feel neither is a good choice, instead of moving for a tie, why not do this:

1) State that neither is a good choice and why you feel this way
2a) State who you think is a better lynch target for the town and why OR
2b) State why you think it's a bad idea to lynch anyone and vote No Lynch

Either way, you can provide an argument, give us an idea of what's on your mind, and maybe sway the town to your cause. And if everyone trying to vote had agreed on a different target or No Lynch, I bet you that would have been what won out in the end, easily (and maybe with less confusion...).

It's too easy to just try to tie and not say anything else. We get so caught up trying to buy ourselves more time by tying votes that we don't make as great of use of the time we DO have as we could be with arguments over who is evil. 

And if de or Linds had died, despite your attempt to move the vote majority, then at least we have where you stood and have a clean list of people responsible for the death. 

I'm fully against tying votes between people just to block the lynch. I'm only against inaction (no lynch) if other options weren't considered. I hope that makes sense.

bainidhe_dub:
Plus if people are voting to tie, it can just take one person making a choice/miscounting to tip the scales. That wouldn't happen if there was a pile of No Lynch votes that have to be overcome to lynch someone.

Patrick:
Ricco nailed my view right on the head. We don't know what roles there are, or their powers. I don't think we can really afford to go about killing people willy-nilly if we don't know whether or not they're our saving grace. We can learn through the actions of our enemies, rest assured.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page