Fun Stuff > CHATTER
Mafia 3 - Under the Moon
TheEvilDog:
*Hides under the bed with several garlands of garlic, branches of holly over and around every door and window, mustard seeds on every pathway, constantly ringing bells and a healthy dose of prayer*
Black Sword:
Currently, the GM is annoyed because he's not sure whose vote he missed. However, it's pretty clear that Patrick also missed someone's vote, as he stated his intent was to tie up the vote to prevent a lynch. The GM is sufficiently annoyed by this that if players do not put "Lynch <user>" at the bottom of their post, separate from the text and in bold, where it can be seen quickly for tallying purposes by all players, that vote will not be counted.
Needless to say, due to GM goof up and somehow still in line with Patrick's intent, Linds still lives. Call it the Grace of God.
However, since it was my goof up...
Lynch Black Sword
:-(
Game and Watch Forever:
All right, can we honestly stop with the voting to purposefully tie stuff up? I feel like all it does is offer a way for vampires (or whatever) to throw a vote into the pot, look like they're contributing, and, in case the person they voted for gets lynched, a good excuse ("oh, but I just wanted to tie it up! How am I a bad person for that?").
Why not let whoever the most people actually want to see dead actually have their way? If it turns out to be wrong, we actually have a list of suspects to jump off of next day (because the chances of NO vampires being on a particular band wagon is slim). And if it's right, we're closer to winning. Can anyone tell me how this situation right now is any better than either of the two I'm presenting? Can anyone actually present a good list of people to jump start our night 1 conversation?
cesium133:
--- Quote from: Game and Watch Forever on 10 Jan 2013, 10:11 ---All right, can we honestly stop with the voting to purposefully tie stuff up? I feel like all it does is offer a way for vampires (or whatever) to throw a vote into the pot, look like they're contributing, and, in case the person they voted for gets lynched, a good excuse ("oh, but I just wanted to tie it up! How am I a bad person for that?").
Why not let whoever the most people actually want to see dead actually have their way? If it turns out to be wrong, we actually have a list of suspects to jump off of next day (because the chances of NO vampires being on a particular band wagon is slim). And if it's right, we're closer to winning. Can anyone tell me how this situation right now is any better than either of the two I'm presenting? Can anyone actually present a good list of people to jump start our night 1 conversation?
--- End quote ---
I agree... in fact I'll note that in games I've played on other forums, the rule that was used was that in the event of a tie, the kill was decided by a coin flip.
idontunderstand:
This is a democratic village, and anyone is free to cast their votes as they see fit. That's my final word in this matter.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version