Fun Stuff > CHATTER
Mafia 4 - Sweet, Sweet Vengeance
TheEvilDog:
Obviously there are dirty people on the team. But we don't know who. So rather than going with a "I know I'm clean" approach, it should be "Well, all these people were on a failed mission so it's one of them", and try a different team.
Thrillho:
Yeah I was taking the (in hindsight dumb) approach of 'let's send the people I'm suspicious of on a mission and see what happens.'
So who's not been yet, you haven't have you?
Zingoleb:
Here's the thing: we've already failed two missions. One more failure means we lose. Period. Putting the most suspicious people on a mission doesn't do anything but give the most suspicious people a chance to butcher our operation.
--- Quote from: TheEvilDog on 17 Feb 2013, 08:17 ---Obviously there are dirty people on the team. But we don't know who. So rather than going with a "I know I'm clean" approach, it should be "Well, all these people were on a failed mission so it's one of them", and try a different team.
--- End quote ---
I was on the first mission, which went fine. And so was Gareth. I know I'm clean, I'm pretty sure Gareth is as well. The biggest thing that makes me disapprove is putting de_la_nae on the mission. I don't trust her.
TheEvilDog:
Or sabotaging the first mission would have thrown suspicion on those in the first group. Its strategy. Lay the groundwork for a believable defence. The best bet would be to go for an entirely new group.
Thrillho:
Well folks, I'm not going to be the one that's up against the wall when the revolution comes.
But then I'm not sure if I believe that Unicorn's clean even though the first mission went okay...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version