Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT: 2392-2396 (25 February- 1 March, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Akima:
A pro photographer using a phone-camera? Oh well, they sneered at Leicas once.
Sidhekin:
Phone camera? Well, I suppose for upskirts, it's a measure of authenticity.
Soulsynger:
Well that actually is understandable. Makes it easier to label it "amateur" or some such. And phone-cameras today have amazing quality to them anyway.
de_la_Nae:
Yeah, for a lot of folks a certain amount of 'realness' can be a big turn-on.
Actually that's one of the amusing dilemmas, as I understand it, of flesh-and-blood pornography. Do you script and act and light and shoot everything in the finest detail possible, enticing your customers' imaginations with large amounts of vivid data? Do you rely on tropes to make a shortcut through their brains (and also probably saving you and your crew money and time that you didn't spend on the soundtrack, the scripting, the acting, etc)? Do you make the effort to pass it off as 'real' and 'amateur' to engage a slightly different path in their minds, a slightly more 'attainable' or 'grounded' fantasy? And then of course you have to consider what the state of the market is, because an important part of the sexual mind craves *change*, and if it's flooded with one type or trope too much your customers will get desensitized...
AAAAAh I'm overthinking this. ._.
Carl-E:
No more so than those who make their living at it...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version