Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCDT: 2397-2401 (4-8 March, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread

<< < (37/71) > >>

Near Lurker:
I got a thirty-two... apparently my problem is right in the middle of the greens.  I got the feeling during the test that my glasses and my dirty screen were getting in the way?  Dunno.

bhtooefr:
I should clarify, screen size and resolution have no bearing on this test's accuracy.

Only color accuracy, and the ability to render high color detail. (So, a 10-bit panel (if the images were in a 30-bit format, which they aren't) would be best, an 8-bit panel pretending to be a 10-bit panel would be very good, an 8-bit panel would be good, a 6-bit panel pretending to be an 8-bit panel may visibly "flicker" and be mediocre, and a 6-bit panel would be bad.)

Method of Madness:

--- Quote from: Valdís on 06 Mar 2013, 10:49 ---Get your shit together, Y-chromosome. That's a sad stat difference.  :-(
--- End quote ---
It's actually the X-chromosome that's the problem. It only affects you if all your X-chromosomes have that problem, which makes it much more likely for males because "all" is just one instead of two.

Bluesummers:
I got a twenty. I'm not surprised, my eyes are terrible. I have three blind spots in one eye and four in the other. It was kinda sad, doing the "find your blind spot" test in science class.

Sidhekin:
I got 61.  Frankly I figure I only got that low because of minute brightness differences ...

(It's been 22 ½ years since I was first told I have reduced colour vision.  My brother, who at the time was working as a ship's captain, was kinda worried when I told him, knowing that it could be hereditary ... the helmsman had better be able to tell red from green, no matter how faint or foggy!)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version