Fun Stuff > CHATTER
Mafia 6: Vampire Village
J:
--- Quote from: TheEvilDog on 19 Mar 2013, 10:22 ---
--- Quote from: de_la_Nae on 19 Mar 2013, 03:19 ---
--- Quote from: Unicorn on 18 Mar 2013, 23:52 ---Lynch de_la_nae. The first person to suggest a lynch is almost undoubtedly a killer.
--- End quote ---
Note to self: pull a Voldemort later. :wink:
Seriously though, I'm torn. A nice glass of Gareth, a pint of EvilDog, or maybe even take a hit of Loki (even though I imagine it would leave me as bonkers as he is). Hrm.
--- End quote ---
You're very bloodthirsty, even for a vampire.
Which tells me two things. Either you're a hunter and you want to murder one of us to make your job easier, or you're an insane vampire. Which might actually be worse.
--- End quote ---
i'm more worried about the ones who don't seem to have any bloodlust.
Loki:
--- Quote from: henri bemis on 19 Mar 2013, 06:12 ---I'm actually leaning toward Loki, now, though - I mean, is latching onto another suggestion supposed to make you less suspicious because you told us it's usually suspicious? My brain hurts.
--- End quote ---
Ah, I can now see what you meant. That was not my way of thinking at all. My reasoning was simply that Linds latched onto the suggestion to kill Gareth.
Maybe I should elaborate my trail of thought a bit more.
If a killer goes the "be the first to suggest a lynching" route, it makes them instantly suspicious to others. Case in point:
--- Quote from: Unicorn on 18 Mar 2013, 23:52 ---The first person to suggest a lynch is almost undoubtedly a killer.
--- End quote ---
Therefore, it would be prudent for them to wait till some lynch-zealous villager X suggests someone Y to lynch and then say that "yeah, now that you mention it, Y is pretty suspicious. Let's lynch them." All the better if they have a believable motive to lynch Y. It matters little to them who gets lynched, so Y is as good to them as anybody else, and it gives them plausible deniability when Y turns out to be innocent ("look, I wasn't even the first to suggest lynching Y! X suggested it! Let's lynch them!"). That also allows a plausible way to lynch two innocents.
...Unless, of course, the killer(s) already predicted that we would come up with that theory and double-bluffed. That should then make de_la_Nae or J suspicious.
J's suggestion is, in fact, quite a conundrum to me. It doesn't seem to be based on anything except paranoia. Unless, of course, J somehow knows more than we do, by way of having abilities above ours and knows for a fact that Linds is going to kill us; then they might have just bought themselves a life insurance for a few nights, because it would be very suspicious if J died the day after they accuse Linds; we would then likely encounter some evidence that they were speaking the truth when accusing Linds, leading us to lynch Linds on the spot.
TL;DR: I suspect everybody.
TheEvilDog:
I had a cow last night. Gotta start the evening the right way.
And don't get me started on the fucking sparkles, capes and full heads of hair. Orlok is the way to go!
Thrillho:
If I'm dying, I'm dying honorably. I vote for no lynch.
henri bemis:
Loki - Ok, now that you've explained your train of thought, it makes a lot more sense to me. In that case, I retract my strong suspicion of you (back to regular suspicion <_<).
I think you might be right about J and Linds, too. This is going to sound bloodthirsty, but we ARE vampires...
If we kill J, and he's innocent, his accusation of Linds seems more plausible (though we can't be sure), and if we kill Linds, and she's innocent, it makes J look quite suspicious, and makes her accusation of Gareth more plausible (but, again, can't be sure).
Or they could both be innocent, and I'm pitting two of our own against each other. Fuck.
We all know that someone had to vote first, so I'm not willing to put de_la_Nae on the bar menu just for that.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version