Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCDT: 2470-2474 (17-21 June, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread

<< < (25/44) > >>

Valdís:
You just did? What else does "Looking at the relationships of others and judging whether they'll work based solely on age-difference" entail?

Method of Madness:
It entails not changing key words when you quote someone.

Valdís:
..I didn't. I quoted your exact words in the original post I responded to, but then I paraphrased the way it read? What?

Method of Madness:
Because you changed thinking to judging which is a pretty damn big change. If I think something wouldn't work for me, that doesn't I mean that someone else shouldn't try it, and it certainly doesn't mean I'm judging them for doing so. That is to say, I can't imagine it working because I can't imagine it working, but I won't tell them not to try.

Valdís:
How is "I think their relationship won't work because X" particularly different from "judging" that to be the case..? Isn't thinking those kinds of things pretty much synonymous with being judgmental about it?

I also don't see why you're bringing it back to "wouldn't work for me" when you talked about the relationships of others with that as the sole information on their compatibility. I also didn't say anything about forbidding it, but it's not like that has ever been a requirement for being judgmental about something.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page