Fun Stuff > ENJOY

X-Men: Days of Future's Past

<< < (13/18) > >>

Neko_Ali:
I'm not really sure the exact reference here, since I haven't see the movie yet. But 'the future' in this case is only supposed to be about 10-20 years from current day I believe. Which given that the story was originally written in what, late 80s, early 90s should mean that we should be neck deep in Sentinels by now... Which would put most of the X-men in their 40s, maybe some in their early 50s. It would be unusual if many of them had gone grey in that time. Wolverine on the other hand is ancient, depending on who you talk to. Certainly around and looking much the same as he does in current day during WWII. In the original comic, Future Wolvie had gone grey. So may it was a call back to that?

Edguy:

--- Quote from: Aimless on 29 May 2014, 03:38 ---Beast woulda been excellent, but looked like he was lifted straight outta the original Hulk TV-series and his action sequences were a mixed bag of awesome and meh.
--- End quote ---

Am I the only one who thought Beast looked downright horrible? I can respect that they wanna use special effects and makeup instead of just CGi-ing everything, but.. He just didn't look good. And his action scenes were like something from a Werewolf b-movie from 1970. His jumping and throwing was so obviously acted with lifting wires I'm slightly shocked something can look that bad in a 2014, $200M movie. On the other hand, the Sentinels looked amazing, especially the 70's ones!


--- Quote from: Aimless on 29 May 2014, 03:38 ---Dinklage, to no-one's surprise, did a surprisingly good job with his character :P
--- End quote ---

Were you surprised? :)

Thrillho:

--- Quote from: Method of Madness on 29 May 2014, 05:38 ---
--- Quote from: Aimless on 29 May 2014, 03:38 ---(don't see it in 3D! The 3D in this movie is really not worth the extra $$$)
--- End quote ---
Does this ever not apply to movies in 3D?

--- End quote ---

Neko_Ali:
You got me. The last time I saw a movie in 3D was Tron Legacy. It was fine in there, but I didn't find it all that noticeable. I certainly don't feel like I'm losing anything watching my DVD of it. I can't watch most 3D movies though. I'm one of those people that gets splitting headaches and nausea watching 3D.

Thrillho:
As a glasses wearer and someone whose eyes are not level on my face I loathe 3D anyway, but even if neither of those was a factor I think I'd hate it.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page