Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCDT: 2554-2558 (14 October - 18 October, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread

<< < (46/49) > >>

Mr_Rose:
Yeah, other than bad saurian anatomy and criminal neglect of the non-red sections of the palette, it hardly seems worth the tag and double spoiler. No more so than looking at any sort of picture at work at least…

Kugai:

--- Quote from: Method of Madness on 19 Oct 2013, 15:24 ---Did I miss something? How is that NSFW?

--- End quote ---

Like I said, I did that for safty reasons - and believe me, that was the tamest image from that site, and I just wanted to err on the side of caution.

Toe:

--- Quote from: Barmymoo on 19 Oct 2013, 12:59 ---I'd say Marigold should wear something which is clean, without holes, comfortable and representative of her interests (she's got several T shirts with logos and images on them, right?
--- End quote ---

Time to break out the YAOI ZONE! 8-)

cesariojpn:

--- Quote from: Method of Madness on 19 Oct 2013, 15:24 ---Did I miss something? How is that NSFW?

--- End quote ---

See, the placement of the dragon's tail could be alluded as a phallic reference in relation to where the woman is..........

techkid:

--- Quote from: Zebediah on 19 Oct 2013, 14:30 ---Details, details. Everybody worries about little insignificant details like how to wear a shirt that lacks head or arm holes.

--- End quote ---
I believe garments like that are commonly referred to as "sacks". People generally frown upon them, and warrant unwanted police attention, particularly when you are being guided by another person (usually with phrases like "RELEASE THE HOSTAGE IMMEDIATELY!" and such).

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version