Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT: 2573-2577 (11-15 November 2013) Weekly Comics Discussion Thread
Skewbrow:
Thanks for the link, Zoe. Sounds like a story I want to read :-)
RightInTheSquishyParts:
--- Quote from: ZoeB on 15 Nov 2013, 21:32 ---
--- Quote from: maxh on 15 Nov 2013, 15:36 ---OED says it was cranch.
--- End quote ---
Scanners live in vain?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scanners_Live_in_Vain
--- End quote ---
You mean there is at LEAST ONE OTHER PERSON who knows of these works?
Fantastic.
Sidhekin:
--- Quote from: rschill on 15 Nov 2013, 11:13 ---In a situation where monogamy is the norm, you need a discussion before you assume polyandry is OK.
--- End quote ---
I think the word you're looking for is "polyamoury" (the u being optional, I guess).
Hmmı. I don't think I'm reading a single comic in which polyandry occurs. (Girl Genius has been teasing us with the concept, but teasing's all it's been.) Not that I have any opening for a new comic right now ...
Hmm². Would you call Tai's past polyamourous relationship polygyny, or would that be unnecessary stretching of the word?
KOK:
--- Quote from: RightInTheSquishyParts on 15 Nov 2013, 22:58 ---
--- Quote from: ZoeB on 15 Nov 2013, 21:32 ---
--- Quote from: maxh on 15 Nov 2013, 15:36 ---OED says it was cranch.
--- End quote ---
Scanners live in vain?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scanners_Live_in_Vain
--- End quote ---
You mean there is at LEAST ONE OTHER PERSON who knows of these works?
Fantastic.
--- End quote ---
More than one.
Is it cold in here?:
The classics are not entirely forgotten.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version