Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCDT: 2686-2690 (21-25 April 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread

<< < (9/30) > >>

Fenriswolf:
I'm pretty surprised they wouldn't have discussed kink. It seems likely she's kinky personally and that's kind of important if it's a central part of her sexuality.

Tova:
Yes, when I have just met someone, especially online, my sexuality is always the first thing I want to discuss. :roll:

Indicible:
Your kinks are not necessarily what you put forward in an online discussion (unless in a specific chat, obviously). Especially if said kinks are a bit "osés". You can have some innuendo; no actual explanation, though.


--- Quote ---Warning - while you were typing a new confession has been posted. You may wish to review your penance.
--- End quote ---

sluthy:

--- Quote from: Fenriswolf on 22 Apr 2014, 22:15 ---I'm pretty surprised they wouldn't have discussed kink. It seems likely she's kinky personally and that's kind of important if it's a central part of her sexuality.

--- End quote ---

She pointed out that they're both self-employed, so I'm guessing they've discussed their respective jobs so Jim shouldn't be COMPLETELY in the dark.

Also, do we know how kinky Veronica herself is in her personal life? She obviously does crazy stuff with her clients and is pretty much up for anything in that regard, but that's all presumably by request. Do we have any clue what she'd get up to with a vanilla/missionary-only kind of person (assuming Jim is) when she's not on the clock?

Method of Madness:
Why would we assume Jim is "missionary-only"? That being said, this seems like a step too far for the forum. They're going on their first date, discussing their sex life is premature.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version