Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
Alignments for Characters
KOK:
--- Quote from: techkid on 06 Jun 2014, 23:02 ---A helpful (and humorous) guide to D&D alignments from another webcomic I read.
http://www.d20monkey.com/2014/04/23/a-matter-of-alignment/
--- End quote ---
Funny, but note that these are alignment abuses, not what the alignments are supposed to be. "Only neutral good" is the worst. Neutral good is no less good than the other good alignments. And chaotic has to do with freedom, not randomness.
Schmee:
I think we could go past alignments and make up entire DnD characters for each character.
Pintsize would be Chaotic Evil, probably some kind of gnoll. A mage, with like a billion useless cantrips memorised.
Marten would follow that guest strip and be a bard, which fits him remarkably well - good with music, fairly useless otherwise.
What would MartenMom be... a rogue, wearing impractical leather armour? Would her BDSM experience translate to some kind of Domination ability, or a high Intimidate score?
This looks like a goldmine, people.
Loki:
Sven would also be a bard, with a Charisma through the roof, but low Wisdom.
...Coincidentally, I played a bard in our forum DnD game.
techkid:
VV definitely would get bonuses for initiative.
--- Quote from: KOK on 06 Jun 2014, 23:32 ---Funny, but note that these are alignment abuses, not what the alignments are supposed to be. "Only neutral good" is the worst. Neutral good is no less good than the other good alignments. And chaotic has to do with freedom, not randomness.
--- End quote ---
I know. But when jwhouk put Pintsize down as 'Chaotic Neutral', that just sprang to mind. Particularly "hide the peanut butter, it's about to get weird."
Platypodes:
VV is definitely chaotic good.
Jim--lawful good.
May--chaotic evil.
Sam--chaotic neutral.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version