Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT: 2801-2805 (29th September - 3rd October) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
kryptoknight:
I would argue that a physical attraction doesn't necessarily imply a desire for a romantic relationship. There are several women I can think of in media and in my own life that I find physically attractive, but there's NO WAY I'd get involved with them.
Platypodes:
Yes, Claire was interested in grabbing Steve's butt... Maybe not quite the same as "romantically" interested. :-D
This breakfast scene is really, really a stretch, but I'm willing to overlook a few plot holes for the sake of getting to meet Claire's mom. And look, she's going to make things just as awkward for Claire as Marten's mom does for him!
evilQuälgeist:
*reads strip*
What? O.O
...
...
...
LOGIC ERROR! X.X
--- Quote from: T on 01 Oct 2014, 21:28 ---Clearly she was interested... How it developed from there on is another matter
--- End quote ---
There is a difference in finding someone pleasant to the eye and beeing romanticaly or sexualy interested i them, finding someone pretty/beautiful and beeing attracted by them are very different. I have a friend who I find very beautiful but who I'm not to at all.
Leveton:
I have no problem with Emily's depiction. She's been flanderized a bit, but she isn't super-unrealistic. I have known people who were supremely odd and prone to non sequiturs the way she is, who would enthusiastically eat a banana "smoothie" made with a hammer, always with their head in the clouds. Not quite to the extent that Emily is, but you see exaggerations like that in practically all fiction.
evilQuälgeist:
Just as a note, I would enthusiastically eat a banana smothie made with a hammer, it's just a funny idea.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version