Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT: 2811-2815 (13-17 October 2014) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Ustrello:
--- Quote from: greywolfe on 13 Oct 2014, 17:37 ---
--- Quote from: aphanisis81 on 13 Oct 2014, 07:36 ---
To be fair, I don't know if Gareth is equating "taking advantage" with "sexual assault." But it does seem like splitting hairs to say, in this case, that there's a big difference. If the issue is that booze interfered with the legitimacy of her consent, then there's really no difference at all.
--- End quote ---
What a load of crap.
Can I turn this around and say that since he was drunk as well, was she not taking advantage of HIM and reducing his capacity for consent?
What this world is turning into, with the lack of personal responsibility and anti-male diatribe, makes me sick :-(
--- End quote ---
Its tumblr feminism that is ruining the feminist movement basically. You do have good ones who preach equality for everyone like Emma watson which is helping turn some of it
bhtooefr:
Both of them had questionable ability to consent, as they were both drunk, and were Sven sober, based on his thoughts, he wouldn't have consented most likely.
The question is, do you charge them with raping each other?
Arkantos:
Comic's Up!
MooskiNet:
Looks like Faye is playing second fiddle to Angus's career. Distant second.
Nyithra:
I'm glad that Angus didn't just assume she would move to New York with him, but I can see from Faye's expression that an explosion is imminent.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version