Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCDT: 2882-2886 (26-30 January 2015)

<< < (159/204) > >>

TheEvilDog:
How about we all just agree to stick with the MST3k mantra regarding the little details - Relax, it's only a webcomic.

Isyrion:

--- Quote from: TheEvilDog on 29 Jan 2015, 14:31 ---How about we all just agree to stick with the MST3k mantra regarding the little details - Relax, it's only a webcomic.

--- End quote ---

You sir get a cookie!   :evil:

Is it cold in here?:
Overanalysis is one of my favorite games though.

jwhouk:
Actually, I think this is more Bellisario's Maxim ("Don't look at this too closely.")

hedgie:

--- Quote from: swapna on 29 Jan 2015, 07:47 ---Man, I keep forgetting how different laws can be depending on which state you're in. I must admit, though, that the ones I've heard of were very specialised employees that had access to real company secrets like technology or something, and it was worth continuing to pay them half their salary for  not working and not fast food employees

--- End quote ---

IIRC, non-compete agreements and many NDAs can't be legally enforced in my state.  They're just there to scare people into complying, and most do.  I'd love to see them rise from the level of "not-enforcible" to flat-out fucking illegal with massive damages awarded as punishment to the spunk-stains who try it.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version