Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT 2902-2906 (23-27 February 2015)
eschaton:
--- Quote from: ReindeerFlotilla on 22 Feb 2015, 18:05 ---May's chassis is of scale with Momo's.
If were going by morphology alone, would it not be the same? Except blue?
--- End quote ---
They are around the same height, but May is built like a woman (or at least someone who has started puberty). You can see here, which is the only comic the two have appeared together in. May is petite, but really her body doesn't look that different from many of the more willowy women in the strip (Dora, Hanners, etc). Momo looks like a 10-12 year old.
Aziraphale:
And Momo's already been mistaken for Marten's daughter or younger sister (this was at the Secret Bakery around the time of the Padma arc), which suggests that she looks young.
SomeCanadianWeirdo:
Another data point is that when they first met Sam thought Momo was a tween girl like her. http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2012
explicit:
Wasn't Momo's chassis just supposed to be anime like? Anime has a tendency to make all their girls look like 12 year-olds in general.
ReindeerFlotilla:
Where as May's chassis is obviously a robot. I doubt anyone has cause to assume the blue girl with visble expansion joints and plastic hair is anything but a robot. But May's chassis is also clearly based on her virtual companion avatar, and that was anime modeled, like Momo. I rather suspect a "lifelike" May would still resemble a child more than an adult, given the anime roots.
"Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed," is not cool. Just because May appears a little older than Momo, it doesn't follow that A) she is. She might be younger. It would explain a lot. B) that she appears age of consent older. Given all the other factors in their character designs, I'm going to assume they are more alike than different until word of god says otherwise.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version