Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT 2947-2951 (27 April to 1 May 2015)
Thrillho:
Yeahhhh that line of discussion stops now please.
pwhodges:
In any case, I can't see why you think her profession factors into this at all. You may object to her "violently assaulting" her son (if that's how you characterise tweaking his ear in a familiar manner), but that would be the same judgement whatever her job might be.
The rest of your speculation has nothing to do with anything that has ever been shown in this comic, so it is inappropriate to bring it up.
jheartney:
--- Quote from: Gladstone on 27 Apr 2015, 22:18 ---We should start a petition to convince Jeph to change it back.
--- End quote ---
Count me for signing that one. The original dialogue was deft and implied some gentle snark. The new script is too literal, and lands with a thud. Since Veronica could have been referring to seeing it coming as far back as the wedding, and since there was no explicit acknowledgment of relationship status in the Mom-selfies strip, it wasn't even a continuity error. CHANGE IT BACK.
Aziraphale:
So say we all.
Method of Madness:
Eh, both exist and we can decide which one we think of as canon.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version