Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT Strips 3176 to 3180 (14 - 18 March 2016)
neurocase:
--- Quote from: BenRG on 18 Mar 2016, 02:40 ---I'm not talking Emily down. She's a perfectly nice, sweet and good-hearted young woman. All I'm saying is that, on a certain level, she'll always have this childlike aspect in which she fails to consider or even fully understand the social consequences of her whims.
--- End quote ---
I dunno; I think her rant with Clinton showed that there's a lot of depth and self-awareness there. She's maybe a bit off-beat, but it's not because of some disorder; it's who she is. She knows it, she owns it, and she refuses to apologize to society for it. Between that and her demonstrated intelligence, Emily's kind of just the "eccentric genius" type, which I think is badass.
Neko_Ali:
I do believe you are using the words 'normal' and 'common' as the same thing, when they are not. Emily doesn't fit within the bounds people rope each other and ourselves into. She never lost that grand wonder that kids tend to have naturally. In short, she hasn't let the world beat her down, and for that she is considered 'weird'. The problem isn't with her I would say. It's how people treat each other.
Jakk Frost:
--- Quote from: neurocase on 18 Mar 2016, 04:32 ---
I dunno; I think her rant with Clinton showed that there's a lot of depth and self-awareness there. She's maybe a bit off-beat, but it's not because of some disorder; it's who she is. She knows it, she owns it, and she refuses to apologize to society for it. Between that and her demonstrated intelligence, Emily's kind of just the "eccentric genius" type, which I think is badass.
--- End quote ---
That should be a poll, "Would you rather be eccentric or acceptable?"
Lubricus:
Why are those two mutually exclusive? I want to be eccentric AND acceptable!
Method of Madness:
Ecceptable? :claireface:
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version