Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCDT Strips 3211 to 3215 (2nd to 6th May 2016)

<< < (53/56) > >>

pwhodges:

--- Quote from: RyanW1019 on 06 May 2016, 12:38 ---The epiphany that Clinton seems to have had was, "If it had worked out, I wouldn't have been mad at Claire. Therefore, I shouldn't be mad at her, because she was just trying to help!" The epiphany I was hoping he'd have was, "If it had worked out, I wouldn't have been mad at Claire. I should be mad at her because she manipulated me, not because it went badly!"
--- End quote ---

I don't see anything that defines which epiphany Clinton has had; the forum happened to take it one way because of what it had been arguing about.

TheEvilDog:
Given the context of the expression on Clinton's face and the recent conversations he has had, it can be easy for it to be construed as Clinton thinking "Hey, would I be angry if Emily had said yes?"

Which would be in line for his character as someone who doesn't really think things through or clearly, its clear that any potential backstep could lead to people getting somewhat annoyed.

Thrillho:

--- Quote from: creatureshock on 06 May 2016, 01:30 ---Even if she had said yes, doesn't make Claire any less of an asshole.

--- End quote ---

Uh. Little bit much.

And a whole lot of subtext interpretation going on throughout this thread that seems to really be lacking in faith in our writer.

Kugai:
She's very good at her job

USS Martenclaire:
I feel there is only way to resolve the whole Claire bad/Clinton bad thing:

Harpoons.


It's what I'm taking away from this story arc.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page