Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT Strips 3241 - 3245 (13-17 June 2016)
wlewisiii:
--- Quote from: Is it cold in here? on 18 Jun 2016, 09:29 ---Sounds like there's some interest. Would people use a DISCUSS thread about climate change if I started one and split the debate into it?
--- End quote ---
Please split if off.
DSL:
--- Quote from: pwhodges on 18 Jun 2016, 14:16 ---
--- Quote from: chaospersonified on 16 Jun 2016, 20:02 ---as far as Renee is concerned, The only objective fact is that Clinton's the guy who followed Brun to her hotel after the bar burned down.
--- End quote ---
No; Clinton's the guy that helped Brun to the hotel.
--- Quote ---This in mind, CAN YOU BLAME HER FOR BEING SUSPICIOUS?
--- End quote ---
Yes. Due caution is prudent and perfectly reasonable; suspicion without cause is unhealthy.
--- End quote ---
You're ignoring the "As far as Renee is concerned" part. Goes to motivation, Your Honor. (Or is that "M'Lud"?)
Larm Hargraven:
I think they were replying to make the point that we, as the readers, know the objective facts. Those facts being that Clinton helped Brun rather than just be "random guy who followed."
DSL:
--- Quote from: Larm Hargraven on 18 Jun 2016, 17:26 ---I think they were replying to make the point that we, as the readers, know the objective facts. Those facts being that Clinton helped Brun rather than just be "random guy who followed."
--- End quote ---
Our motivations don't matter; Renee's are under discussion.
Tova:
--- Quote from: pwhodges on 18 Jun 2016, 14:16 ---
--- Quote from: chaospersonified on 16 Jun 2016, 20:02 ---as far as Renee is concerned, The only objective fact is that Clinton's the guy who followed Brun to her hotel after the bar burned down.
--- End quote ---
No; Clinton's the guy that helped Brun to the hotel.
--- Quote ---This in mind, CAN YOU BLAME HER FOR BEING SUSPICIOUS?
--- End quote ---
Yes. Due caution is prudent and perfectly reasonable; suspicion without cause is unhealthy.
--- End quote ---
You're not being entirely fair.
One can hardly disagree with your perfectly reasonable sounding remark at first blush, but the phrase due caution is purely subjective, as is the distinction betwen that and suspicion without cause. Which of those Renee is exhibiting is precisely the subject of the discussion. Everyone seems to constantly forget that Renee is in the dark and we are not.
So, is Renee's suspicion without cause? Maybe, maybe not. We don't know their history.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version