Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCDT Strips 3411 to 3415 (6th to 10th February 2017)

<< < (54/62) > >>

A small perverse otter:

--- Quote from: Morituri on 09 Feb 2017, 15:23 ---If you found a used plot device at a second-hand store, would you buy it? 

--- End quote ---
You only find them at the little shop that wasn't there yesterday.

Which begs the question "Would you buy a sketchy plot device from a sketchy plot device?"

brasca:
Can't blame Bubbles for the loss of the badge.  The raccoon acted on it's own.

jheartney:
If CW wanted to fight the charges, she could easily have whatever evidence Creepybot handed to Basilisk excluded as it was illegally obtained. Or at the very least, it was obtained under legally ambiguous circumstances. A decent defense attorney could get it thrown out easily.

Basilisk is just being a good cop in wanting to know the bigger picture. And frankly, given that CW's confession came under duress, any conviction obtained with it is probably invalid. (Not that that ever stopped the conviction of small fry like CW.)

Faye and Bubbles ought to have brought an attorney with them. As it is they are taking a big chance that Basilisk doesn't try to collar them as well for conspiracy. If any of you ever decides to go in and spill the beans to police, bring an attorney.

Method of Madness:

--- Quote from: jheartney on 09 Feb 2017, 20:36 ---A decent defense attorney could get it thrown out easily.
--- End quote ---
Yes, but Corpsie knows what will happen to her if she allows that to happen.

Tova:
CW will plead guilty regardless, so it's moot.

But where did that evidence come from? Eyewitness statements legally obtained? Conjured out of thin air? Magic?

It's tangential, so it hardly matters I suppose, but... eh. The whole resolution is a hand wave anyway.

Sorry, don't mean to sound whiny. I'm still enjoying the comic, honestly!

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page