Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT Strips 3481 to 3485 (15-19 May 2017)
Jakk Frost:
--- Quote from: BenRG on 18 May 2017, 01:36 ---
--- Quote from: JimC on 18 May 2017, 01:13 ---
--- Quote from: gopher on 17 May 2017, 23:51 ---Didn't Face give May shit for exactly this Objectification?
--- End quote ---
And in any case isn't ogling a robot's posterior akin to getting all worked up about a shop window dummy?
--- End quote ---
A shop window dummy isn't a moving, talking, feeling person. That's the difference.
--- End quote ---
Technically I think feminists would still normally consider it sexual objectification anyways since, android or not, (and shop window dummy or not), Bubbles looks like a woman. And I'm pretty sure they consider the real life robot sex dolls to be sexually objectifying, at least when the robots look like women. However, since it's women doing the objectifying, feminists would be silent.
brasca:
--- Quote from: gopher on 17 May 2017, 23:51 ---Didn't Faye give May shit for exactly this objectification?
--- End quote ---
Yes, but in May's case she walked up to Bubbles and remarked about her posterior so it was more about her being rude than objectification which honestly everybody does and is only a problem if people act on those impulses.
It's actually a credit to Dora that she didn't notice earlier when she was there for the lease signing. She saw Bubbles out of her armor and even though the sweater covered the top half she could still get a good look if she was that curious.
shanejayell:
Heh.
Getting 'Daaaang'ed by a lesbian, bi-lesbian and a bi-curious. Or possible robo-sexual. :-D
fayelovesbubbles:
Dora is bisexual. There's no such thing as a bi lesbian. :-D
djhash:
So while Bubbles gets danged for her butt; Claire and Bubbles are "cutting the cheese"? Two butt jokes in one comic!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version