Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT Strips 3481 to 3485 (15-19 May 2017)
Jakk Frost:
--- Quote from: brasca on 18 May 2017, 07:09 ---
--- Quote from: gopher on 17 May 2017, 23:51 ---Didn't Faye give May shit for exactly this objectification?
--- End quote ---
Yes, but in May's case she walked up to Bubbles and remarked about her posterior so it was more about her being rude than objectification which honestly everybody does and is only a problem if people act on those impulses.
--- End quote ---
That's not the popular narrative these days, even just looking can be a crime, if you look at the wrong person.
--- Quote from: Akima on 18 May 2017, 16:24 ---
--- Quote from: Jakk Frost on 18 May 2017, 06:38 ---And I'm pretty sure they consider the real life robot sex dolls to be sexually objectifying, at least when the robots look like women.
--- End quote ---
Well, sex-dolls are sexually objectifying, but then they are inanimate objects.
--- End quote ---
Well my point was they call sex dolls and even "pocket pussies" or fleshlights sexually objectifying, but they don't apply the same thinking to dildos, which have a much larger market.
Gyrre:
Your complaint has been noted, Jakk.
However, it should be stated that things are seldom so simple as the terms you've placed them in. Kudos for addressing that a double-standard does exist amongst part of the population in some regards. However, it should also be noted that that's 'one grain of rice weighed against a hundred' so to speak.
Tova:
This should apply both ways, too.
https://the-orbit.net/greta/2011/12/29/why-yes-but-is-the-wrong-response-to-misogyny/
pwhodges:
"Yes, but..." is the standard introduction for an example of a "two wrongs make a sort-of right" argument.
Tova:
Yes.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version