Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT 4131-4135 (Nov 11th-15th, 2019)
Tova:
--- Quote from: hakko504 on 27 Nov 2018, 23:38 ---
--- Quote from: Rincewind on 27 Nov 2018, 19:28 ---Comic's up!
Beepatrice seems nice, if a little easily flustered.
I wonder if it's pronounced Bee-patrice or Beep-atrice?
(O.K., I've been up waaaaayyyy too long...)
--- End quote ---
I'm thinking it should be Beep-atrice. Sort of self-censored. And would go nice with a Basilisk.
[edit] No shipping of AIs intended, just the names have a nice theme together [/edit]
--- End quote ---
Holy cow. It's almost a year ago.
DSL:
But is a beep a bleep?
(Which inexplicably takes me back to those longago Saturday mornings when Josie and the Pussycats were IN SPACE, and had an alien (pet/companion/was never really clear) named "Bleep." All the little (bleep)er ever said was "bleep."
Such language! And me with such an impressionable young mind.
And not long after that, this guy. Such a mouth.
Scarlet Manuka:
--- Quote from: Wingy on 13 Nov 2019, 13:07 ---
--- Quote from: Netherdan on 13 Nov 2019, 03:02 ---The test specification just said "Firewall tests" so they're testing various scenarios involving the words "fire" and "wall" in some way
--- End quote ---
I am unable to imagine the need for any combination of dildo and "fire + wall" testing that makes any sense. The only thing I can come close to would be an internet enabled dildo that would keep track of running time and export it to a web site for your later annotation and review. But the very thought of that kind of privacy breach is about to give me hives...
--- End quote ---
There have already been, in our own universe, issues with privacy on internet connected sex toys. In 2016 it was shown that one connected vibrator sent customers' settings and usage information to the manufacturer's server without consent (the company eventually had to pay a settlement for that), and that third parties could access that information - and even take over the devices remotely. In 2017 another connected vibrator with a built-in camera was found to be hackable to give unauthorised people access to the video feed. In the same year it was discovered that one model of butt plug could be found and remotely controlled via Bluetooth.
As with other IoT devices, much of the market has little to no security, and for example will advertise themselves over Bluetooth to any nearby phone. Walk around your workplace with your Bluetooth explorer open and you might get a surprise or two. As is commonplace, the manufacturers tend to start paying attention to security after problems are found and publicised, not in the design stages, so at any one time there are lots of insecure products on the market.
Links are not hard to find, I'm just not going to search them up on my work computer (and can't be bothered manually copying them from my phone).
Wingy:
--- Quote from: DSL on 16 Nov 2019, 06:58 ---And not long after that, this guy. Such a mouth.
--- End quote ---
Bleeped out every line he had...
Of course, beepatrice could be a back formation singularizing with censoring dominatrice. Which would make her excessively sniveling personality a deliberate affection - and maybe her work at the non-profit is also a reflection of her determination to somehow escape the field. Makes you wonder if Beeps would know anything about Marten's mom.
Theta9:
--- Quote from: DSL on 16 Nov 2019, 06:58 ---But is a beep a bleep?
(Which inexplicably takes me back to those longago Saturday mornings when Josie and the Pussycats were IN SPACE, and had an alien (pet/companion/was never really clear) named "Bleep." All the little (bleep)er ever said was "bleep."
Such language! And me with such an impressionable young mind.
And not long after that, this guy. Such a mouth.
--- End quote ---
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITr90v7UaNg
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version