Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT strips 4221-4225 (16th to 20th of March, 2020)
Gyrre:
--- Quote from: shanejayell on 16 Mar 2020, 18:54 ---New strip up.
As my books are basically random, I'd likely drive poor Beeps nuts.
--- End quote ---
Sounds like an 'alphabetical by author' scenario.
--- Quote from: Tova on 16 Mar 2020, 20:20 ---I am a huge fan of the organise by colour idea. The only issue is that book sets might be a bit annoying.
--- End quote ---
I typically go by subject and group series together. I'll also further subdivide anthologies into their own section witjin their subject.
celticgeek:
In library school, my daughter ran across someone who shelved his books alphabetically by publisher.
Tova:
I used to live with someone who arranged her music CDs chronologically by composer (I think) birth date.
TorporChambre:
That's all well and good, but the question becomes: within the author, how? Some lexicographically titlewise, but methinks better chronically (editionally). But series; naturally, sorted together; but internally? Often indicial and chronical are tantamount, but where differ, some inferiously. Into it's author is a temptation patently improper; pertinent is when have been all?
--- Quote from: DaiJB on 16 Mar 2020, 05:11 ---what I really want to see is the QC live action series - I was thinking of a sort of "Red Dwarf" style
--- End quote ---
When set to hardcore mode, preventing interöneiric interruption---a feature decried by hypocrites (and some their students) as counterproductive (historians, later, would note the correlation of novative 2^nd order acceleration and it's edition. an economic analysis has indicated reduced interpersonal distinction; corroboratory studies are inchoate)---in my aforementioned Rollenspiel the player might ``awaken'' to being exactly what he hates. For example, one might ``wake'' to find that he keeps his (cyberal) library paperbound, sorted chronologically, by the time of the latest edition by that item's editor, relative to the time of his acquisition of the previous (lexicographically, by it's previous owner's tax-id) item in his library. Naturally, the superior organization is indistinguishable from noise:
--- Quote from: shanejayell on 16 Mar 2020, 18:54 ---'d likely drive poor Beeps nuts.
--- End quote ---
BenRG:
Something else to add to the database on Beepatrice, I guess: "Likely too helpful." Instead of doing what would, at least to me, be the obvious thing and put the books on the shelf in the order I fish them out of the box, Beepatrice would prefer to use some organising method otherwise she's just not doing the job!
Panel 1 and... yeah, Beeps really is a social wallflower isn't she? She looks as reluctant to get in the middle of the party as I usually feel!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version