Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT strips 4301-4305 (6th July to 10 July 2020)
Gamesman001:
I'm not sure it would be qualified as sex work. How many human women/men receive expensive gifts from their sex partners. The jails would fill up even faster. My point was that's what May would WANT it to be because she's kind of weird and it also allows her to accept it as a sex-gift not charity. She has trouble accepting help of any kind but if she thought it was about a pervert getting off she'd be into it both emotionally and physically. She was into it even without actual sex parts. And I'm sure they can supply connections so she could feel actual orgasms. She could tell all her AI buddies if it is worth the trouble. Bound to be some issued with upkeep and cleaning. There could be weeks of story related stuff just from her perspective.
Mad Cat:
My prediction, robot voice boxes use ordinary speakers mechanicly coupled to their windpipe to do the sound production and lion's share of the sound formation. Her substandard body used one with a paper sound cone to save 5¢ per unit and between that and her "overenthusiastic use of speech", she's blown her sound cone. Faye and Bubs can replace it with a polymer cone one cheap and easy, but it'll take a few days to get the specialized size/mounting hardware for installing it. In the meantime, they install a Bluetooth module and May has to carry around a portable, battery-powered BT speaker to be able to talk.
Thrudd:
More than likely they could scavenge one from an OopsyDaisy at the SallyAnn shop for a few bucks.
zmeiat_joro:
--- Quote from: cesium133 on 10 Jul 2020, 09:09 ---Back when I was in grad school, I was given a large collection of... less than legally-obtained... physics textbooks in DjVu format. It was a useful format, but even back then it was hard to find good software for that format.
--- End quote ---
I seem to remember that DjVu was supported, on Linux at least, 10-ish years ago, but don't quote me on that.
EDIT: Tova, the definition of .pdf is Postscript with whatever bullshit Adobe decides to add? Has that changed?
Tova:
Yes, Adobe isn't in control of the standard anymore. PDF 2.0 was developed by an ISO working group and they have removed parts of the standard that depended on Adobe technology, so it is possible to implement a reader or a writer without reference to Adobe software.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version