Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT Strips 4326-4330 (10-15 August 2020)
cybersmurf:
--- Quote from: Case on 13 Aug 2020, 18:55 ---
--- Quote from: Marco on 13 Aug 2020, 12:34 ---When I saw today's strip, all I could think was "Thank God it's not friday". Unless, of course, Steve's back tomorrow as some of you suggested.
(I hope Jeph is not reading this and having ideas)
--- End quote ---
IIRC, Jeph has been forcing himself to have a buffer of already finished strips for several years now - so I'd say it's unlikely your comments today could influence tomorrow's strip.
He also insists he doesn't read the forums, for his own sanity.
--- End quote ---
Doesn't mean he could throw some fresh Melons at us.
And Mister JJ checks in every now and then, mostly when some specialist gets reported. But yeah, he usually doesn't, for his sanity's sake.
Does today's strip count as semi-cliffhanger? Clinton has gotten the message, but there is no answer yet.
--- Quote from: Farideh on 13 Aug 2020, 23:07 ---There might be a chance for Elliot and Clinton: Clinton once said that he would be open for the possibility if the right guy came along
--- End quote ---
AND Clinton says Elliot would be quite a catch! So, personally, I think there actually is a chance for... Ellton? Better not have me go there. In that corner of my mind there is only madness.
cesium133:
--- Quote from: cybersmurf on 14 Aug 2020, 10:00 ---
--- Quote from: Farideh on 13 Aug 2020, 23:07 ---There might be a chance for Elliot and Clinton: Clinton once said that he would be open for the possibility if the right guy came along
--- End quote ---
AND Clinton says Elliot would be quite a catch! So, personally, I think there actually is a chance for... Ellton? Better not have me go there. In that corner of my mind there is only madness.
--- End quote ---
Ellton? Hopefully they don't meet a rocket man named Johnn.
de_la_Nae:
let slip about claire about what?
Cornelius:
Out her, they mean, I think. At least that's what I responded to, even if it's a non sequitur.
Mr_Rose:
--- Quote from: snubnose on 14 Aug 2020, 06:15 ---
--- Quote from: Mr_Rose on 14 Aug 2020, 04:26 ---The reason transphobes want trans* people to “be honest” i.e. wear a name tag is the same reason the Nazis wanted Jews to wear a yellow star; so they know who to target.
--- End quote ---
Eh ?
I have never heard of people who demand that transpeople have to wear public tags ?
And by the way, the goal of the Nazis was to further victimize the jews. They became very outraged when they found out that people by vast majority instead expressed how bad they felt for jews when they saw people wearing these signs.
--- End quote ---
You mean except those people who tried (and are trying) to pass laws to force trans* people to use the ‘correct’ (according to their birth certificate) bathroom? Using propagandist fear-mongering lies as ‘justification’ for their blatant bigotry? With specific clauses to allow “concerned citizens” to confirm that “suspicious individuals” were in compliance, presumably by some form of ID check? You never heard of those guys? Well now you have; don’t forget.
As for the rest of your post: yes, and? Further victimisation (over and above the increased suicide rate, enormously inflated risk of physical and sexual assault, and outrageously inflated medical costs) of trans* people is the transparently blatant goal. And yes, they all got very upset when the bill(s) were struck down before they could become laws because of massive public outcry.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version