Fun Stuff > BAND
Most Hurtful Record Review Ever
La Creme:
I once read a reveiw in which all three of these things were written: "Disco Volante was a terrible album", "DFD* took Bungle's ideas and just made them so much more intresting", and "I guess Mike Patton should've just stopped with 'Angel Dust'".
I was chewing my fist by the end. I wanted to find this person and kill them nine times, and then kill every peice of them nine times, then kill their family.
*Dog Fashion Disco
McTaggart:
The problem I've got with pitchfork, is that they seem to strive to be completely unreadable. They're not quite at the level of 'Landscapes and Land Uses', my geography textbook, but they're close.
Dara:
I like Pitchfork's writers. I find I rarely agree completely with any critic's opinion of an album, but it's more how they handle the review itself that interests me.
kikanjuuneko:
I wasn't very fond of Atreyu's latest.
Se7en:
--- Quote from: Merkava ---
--- Quote from: Station ---
--- Quote from: Merkava ---Just because it's art, doesn't mean it's good.
--- End quote ---
I don't think that any art is factually good or bad. You either like it or you don't, or think that it's more or less relevant to your life. Music is art.
This is my reality.
--- End quote ---
So...you've proved my point. Argument is useless.
--- End quote ---
No, i dont think you HAVE a point. Art is entirely subjective right? Music is art. So is writing. And you critisise a peice of creative writing on the subject of music, on objective grounds?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version