Fun Stuff > CLIKC

AMD sues intel woot!

<< < (4/5) > >>

zekterellium:
god i hope amd wins.

Shinigami-Sama:

--- Quote from: adarkA ---
--- Quote from: Sydney ---Still, AMD are great. Down with intel.

The pre-built thingy is a bitch.
--- End quote ---


YESH! DOWN WITH INTEL WOO GO AMD

I got a AMD ATHLON64 3400 and im proud to say its far better than intels! Ha!
AMD clock speeds are far lower than then intels yet they have the same processing power! Surely AMD should be better!! Grr haha intel r afraid of competition! I hate them anyway, all the intels i used either blew up Or were just damn to slow!
My 1.3GhzDuron i once had Was a lot faster than thier 2.7Ghz Celeron!
 I know the celeron is the lower grade Pentium but so is the duton for the Athon so :-P
--- End quote ---

far slower?
not realy dude, and this is jsut for publicity
AMD luanch hte x2 earlier ^.^
dual core, and they're far supiory that intel's "sticktwocoresonastandarddie" dual core, making the cores have to comunicate VIA the FSB

I love amd, but I couldn't afford the amd64 I wanted, and even then, I got screwed with this PC, but over all, AMD will "lose" but teh courts will tell intell ot back off, they have enough proof for a small slap, enough to make people aware atleast

Samari:
Intel has already been found guilty of violating anti-trust laws in Japan and AMD did a lot of the leg work on that case.  Japan is one of the 3 big players in the world when it comes to matters of ant-trust laws (the other 2 being the US and EU).  If AMD has all the evidence they say they do about preditory pricing, retaliation against vendors, forcing vendors into exclusive agreements then Intel is going to have a very tough time shaking these claims

JP:
Shinigami-Sana: I don't know what benchmarks you've been reading, but the Pentium Extreme Edition outperforms the AMD X2 when actually running multiple processor-intensive applications. When running programs that utilize only one core, the X2 performs better, for all of the same reasons the 64 outperforms the P4. Presumably if you're going to buy a dual-core chip, dual-core performance is what should matter most, and Intel's dual core solution, at least right now, is superior, talking points about architecture notwithstanding.

Shinigami-Sama:

--- Quote from: JP ---Shinigami-Sana: I don't know what benchmarks you've been reading, but the Pentium Extreme Edition outperforms the AMD X2 when actually running multiple processor-intensive applications. When running programs that utilize only one core, the X2 performs better, for all of the same reasons the 64 outperforms the P4. Presumably if you're going to buy a dual-core chip, dual-core performance is what should matter most, and Intel's dual core solution, at least right now, is superior, talking points about architecture notwithstanding.
--- End quote ---

I"ll seee your unproven remark and raise you proof that the x2 is better
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2397&p=4
also how much faster the dual core amkes video encoding on the SMP-optimized AVC codec
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=94226

the first link shows the workings of the P-E and hte X2
if you have an read/easoning skill you'll note that even intel thinks their "solution" sucks, the only reason intel is "better" is because of the higher core frequancy, although that means more power and heat, wher as AMD has the better chip desing, less power usage and therfore less heat, and it;s easly and safly overclockable to comparative clock speeds

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page