Fun Stuff > CLIKC

GTA: AO

<< < (9/10) > >>

Se7en:
I'm in agreement there. Ultimately, all this idiocy does is make games, gamers, and the game industry look bad.

We dont need computer games to be demonised by those that attempt to force their moral values onto others, because power in the hands of those people is dangerous.

Gryff:

--- Quote from: neomang5 ---We on the other hand get shafted with higher game prices, increased security on underaged game buying, and having to wait to get a good game that was once easily accessible.
--- End quote ---


Firstly, I doubt that Rockstar will bump up the price of the game - that would be a pretty underhanded thing to do.

Secondly, underaged game buying shouldn't be happening in the first place so I don't see this as a negative - just because they're games doesn't mean that they should be exempt from classification.

I'll give you the point about the game being made unavailable though.

Basically the bad guys here are the politicians and the media for blowing this way out of proportion, and the lame-ass retailers who decide not to stock a game just because it's rated AO (and because of the media coverage). Rockstar may have acted stupidly, but they haven't really done anything wrong as far as I can see.

ForteBass:

--- Quote from: Gryff ---
Firstly, I doubt that Rockstar will bump up the price of the game - that would be a pretty underhanded thing to do.
--- End quote ---


Underhanded like leaving a sex game in their code and then lying about it?

Se7en:
Rockstar wont increase prices, but retailers certainly would.

happybirthdaygelatin:
Oh god oh god, not sex in video games.  Seriously, going out into the woods and dancing (together or by themselvesses) use to be considered evil and wrong.  In another, say, ten years, this won't be diddly squat.  Fuck, it's hardly diddly squat now.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version