Fun Stuff > CLIKC
Xbox 360 vs REVO vs PS3
Mikintosh:
As a Nintendo buddy, I'm gleeful to see Revolution in front. I might pick up Xbox 360 way on down the line, but I don't see how Halo 3 can be so drastically different to plunk down $300-ish for the privelege to play it. PS3: the no.
Stranger Dan:
The PS2 did a good job at letting me play all of the most important titles but a $500 price tag isn't realistic. I might go with an Xbox 360 if it is fully backwards compatible so I can play all of the games that I missed on the first Xbox. The partial backwards compatibility that I've been hearing about will let me play Mech Assault sure but I want to play Panzer Dragoon and at least have an unrealistic ambition of playing Steel Battilion.
If I don't get a good price and full backwards compatibility I'll probably just stay with a Nintendo so I can play Metroid, Zelda, and Smash Brothers.
Lug:
If I were to buy a console it would be a Nintendo. The games appeal to me more and I don't see the point in buying another computer just for PSX/Xbox games.
Hado-Ken:
I will get a PS3, but I will also get a Revolution purely for Zelda and Mario games, and for awesome RPGs that no one has ever heard of. (These do exist, Tales of Symphonia, Skies of Arcadia: Legends, these could have been huge if they were on the PS2)
happybirthdaygelatin:
I figure I'll end up with all three eventually. I have no loyalties to any specific system because they're all made by big ass companies who don't care about your loyalty, just your disposable income.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version