THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: jwhouk on 04 Apr 2010, 19:36

Title: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 04 Apr 2010, 19:36
Here's your discussion thread. Discuss.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 04 Apr 2010, 20:07
Is "discuss" the opposite of "cuss"?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: akronnick on 04 Apr 2010, 20:10
I always thought it was like a really heavy frisbee.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Tuitsuro on 04 Apr 2010, 20:41
I always thought it was like a really heavy frisbee.

Nah, the heavy ones you throw in high winds, so it'd be a disgust
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 04 Apr 2010, 21:17
Ok I just got back from six months in the future and I can honestly say that today's comic was the absolutely funny-est thing I have ever seen on the internet... sadly due to causality violations and a temporal paradox we accidentally caused Jeph to come up with a different idea...  Which he is still apparently working on. 

Sorry folks.    :|
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 04 Apr 2010, 21:20
You violated causality? What's your excuse for that, that causality was provocatively dressed?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 04 Apr 2010, 21:23
You violated causality? What's your excuse for that, that causality was provocatively dressed?

No, it dropped the soap in the shower and bent over.    After spending so much time in prison what happened next was just pure reflex. 

I apologize for destroying the next six months worth of comics though... so cut me some slack.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Tuitsuro on 04 Apr 2010, 22:09
I apologize for destroying the next six months worth of comics though... so cut me some slack.

From the way you put it, it sounded like today's QC was great, but then it went downhill for six months as Jeph couldn't best it.  So from our perspective, maybe you saved us half a year of forum rants and bitchings regarding the great QC suckhole of 2010.  
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Kugai on 05 Apr 2010, 00:55
Ok I just got back from six months in the future and I can honestly say that today's comic was the absolutely funny-est thing I have ever seen on the internet... sadly due to causality violations and a temporal paradox we accidentally caused Jeph to come up with a different idea...  Which he is still apparently working on. 

Sorry folks.    :|

Thank you MDBS, I have passed this information onto the Starfleet Bureau of Temporal Affairs - Please expect a visit from the Captain of the USS Relativity shortly.

On a side note, please be on the lookout for Captain Braxton - he is currently wanted and suffering from Temporal Psychosis - Do not approach and inform the proper authorities.

Thank you for your time.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: akronnick on 05 Apr 2010, 01:18
Hannelore always has such a pragmatic outlook on things, doesn't she?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: jeanramone on 05 Apr 2010, 01:29
Wow Hannelore, that's some great support you're giving there. /sarcasm. I get that she is pushing her boundaries and that but to hate on someone for feeling down just doesn't help at all, quite the opposite actually.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: wargrafix on 05 Apr 2010, 02:00
hot damn, I hate when fiction parallels in real life.

I got rejected this weekend, on my birthday. And its was the horrible kind.


On comic topic, hanners is going crtiical. Soon the entire cast of QC will be swallowed in the singularity of a hanners hole.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Schmorgluck on 05 Apr 2010, 02:15
Well, self-loathing is a pretty shitty thing to witness.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: zagraf on 05 Apr 2010, 03:19
Hanners meant well, but what worked on Faye ("I am not putting up with any more of your shit!") clearly isn't going to work on Marigold.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Schmorgluck on 05 Apr 2010, 03:42
She's too involved. Which, by the way, is good news for her mental health. But she's a bit too close to Marigold to be efficiently stern, like she did with Faye, but also with Dora and Marten (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=981). There her general detachment from common relational hijinks gave her an edge to call bullshit on people. Not so much here.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Tuitsuro on 05 Apr 2010, 04:28
Marigold's good at hating herself.  She's had years of experience to know how to berate herself, and if you've ever dealt who's truely like Marigold then you know it's very hard to get them out of that mindset.  They wallow around in self-pity and it becomes hard to tell if you've made any progress with them at all.  Makes it fairly easy to just give up on them, because it seems they've already given up on themselves and refuse to get unstuck from the mire.  Sort of like that horse in Neverending Story.  It just sits there and sinks in the swamp and you as a 5-year-old start crying because of that fucking horse.  
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: zagraf on 05 Apr 2010, 05:08
hey wallow around in self-pity and it becomes hard to tell if you've made any progress with them at all.  Makes it fairly easy to just give up on them

Like Family Guy's Lois who, after trying to cheer Meg up, says, "All right, look, it's been forty-five minutes. I'm leaving you with a bottle of Ambien and a book of Sylvia Plath poetry, and whatever happens, happens." Dark humour at its darkest.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 05 Apr 2010, 05:19
hot damn, I hate when fiction parallels in real life.

I got rejected this weekend, on my birthday. And its was the horrible kind.

Sorry to hear that.  Bt really, is there a non-horrible kind? 

Quote
On comic topic, hanners is going crtiical. Soon the entire cast of QC will be swallowed in the singularity of a hanners hole.

Hanners hole?  Hmmm....

Nooo!  ...must...fight...mental....image!!!
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Apr 2010, 05:37
Ok I just got back from six months in the future and I can honestly say that today's comic was the absolutely funny-est thing I have ever seen on the internet... sadly due to causality violations and a temporal paradox we accidentally caused Jeph to come up with a different idea...  Which he is still apparently working on. 

Sorry folks.    :|

Thank you MDBS, I have passed this information onto the Starfleet Bureau of Temporal Affairs - Please expect a visit from the Captain of the USS Relativity shortly.

On a side note, please be on the lookout for Captain Braxton - he is currently wanted and suffering from Temporal Psychosis - Do not approach and inform the proper authorities.

Thank you for your time.
I'd think he'd be better served looking out for Katarakis and the Chronomancer.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: sudamerican on 05 Apr 2010, 05:48
Quote
It just sits there and sinks in the swamp and you as a 5-year-old start crying because of that fucking horse. 
yeah, that's just what i needed to be reminded of on a monday morning  :x
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 05 Apr 2010, 05:52
Bleah.  Neverending story might as well have been...

But yeah, it can be easy to get stuck in the quagire of self-pity.  And you do want to slap someone around who's doing it, but mainly because we all have been there, and know how fucking stupid and unproductive it really is.  You want to save them from themselves, and you can't, and it's frustrating and.. and... Dammit, just STOP IT!!

Oh.  Sorry. 
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Apr 2010, 06:06
Bleah.  Neverending story might as well have been...

But yeah, it can be easy to get stuck in the quagire of self-pity.  And you do want to slap someone around who's doing it, but mainly because we all have been there, and know how fucking stupid and unproductive it really is.  You want to save them from themselves, and you can't, and it's frustrating and.. and... Dammit, just STOP IT!!

Oh.  Sorry. 

Hanners, you left your Disinfectantbot 9000 on upstairs.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 05 Apr 2010, 06:07
So Jeph, how was the sweet potato and black pepper beer?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Apr 2010, 06:09
I think what's happening when Hanners has those "outbursts" (like in panel 3A), she's channeling her mom's domineering side. Her genuine concern for other people might be something that came from one of her nannies... or maybe Daddy Chatham is really just a big ol' softie?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: wargrafix on 05 Apr 2010, 06:27
hot damn, I hate when fiction parallels in real life.

I got rejected this weekend, on my birthday. And its was the horrible kind.

Sorry to hear that.  Bt really, is there a non-horrible kind? 

Quote
On comic topic, hanners is going crtiical. Soon the entire cast of QC will be swallowed in the singularity of a hanners hole.

Hanners hole?  Hmmm....

Nooo!  ...must...fight...mental....image!!!

True, all kinds are horrible. But this rejection was so bad that I am convinced I was in a plan to see if a human can die from awkwardness.
Reality is she is going after a friend who she knows has a woman. lol, go figure.

lol...hanners hole says, "Resistance is futile, Human"

Note: unlike most forums the quote button is on the top right, I almost reported his post by mistake
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: kent_eh on 05 Apr 2010, 06:30
Marigold's good at hating herself.  She's had years of experience to know how to berate herself, and if you've ever dealt who's truely like Marigold then you know it's very hard to get them out of that mindset.

My wife has been suffering from Depression for about a year, or more.

No matter how hard you want/need to help them, there's not much you can truly do for them, other than:


-keep yourself from being destroyed. (despite your gut reaction, this is priority #1)
-Be supportive.
-try to minimize the collateral damage of their bad decisions.
-hope that they stick to their medications and eventually return to their old self ('cause it won't just go away on it's own)
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: AshiHalfangel on 05 Apr 2010, 06:54
Hanners probably shouldn't yell at her like that, but also being all "Awwz poor widdle Mar Mar ish so saaaaaaad!" doesn't help either. Kinda need a healthy balance of being supportive, yet not in a way that babies them. Cause normally when I get depressed about something and everyone is all "aww poor you" makes me even more depressed. But when someone is like "Hey, that sucks and I feel really bad for you...but...*insert "wake the hell up, it's not all about you, but in a nice way" speech* then I'm able to break away from it and think, "Hey, it's not so bad when you really think about it."
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: fineout on 05 Apr 2010, 08:48
i dont see why you guys blame hannelore for reacting like she did, people crying over something their own naivety created are annoying, and she clearly just explained why she is getting fed up. I had a girlfriend like that and dropper her like a bad habit because it annoyed the shit out of me.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Apr 2010, 09:20
Hannelore is nowhere near having one of her She-Hulk moments. I mean the severity is nowhere near that level. She may be microseconds away from it, though.

What she's doing is the equivalent of Sven hitting Faye with a rolled-up magazine. It may not work.

The lifetime of persecution Marigirl endured leaves an invidious choice. The old saying is that "If twenty people call you a horse, buy a saddle". We're not wired to ignore the opinions of those around us, except for psychopaths. She could either have gone crazy or believed the abusers.

Apropos of nothing, I wonder if it means anything that all the late-night visitors picked "chocolate" in the poll and the later ones picked the more violent options.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: carvin on 05 Apr 2010, 09:30
A stern reaction when you are depressed and want pity is a bitter pill. I've taken enough pills in my life to know they often are the most useful (real and metaphorical).

Hanners is right. If nothing else she has every right to be mad. It's also what Marigold needs. Marigold needs to realize that Angus genuinely care about her. To the outside observer (us AND Hanners) it is obvious. To Marigold, well, she's never been in this place. She's probably never thought anyone 'liked' her before now at all, much less acted on it. General rejection is no where near 'true rejection' where there is some possibility of gain (in other words, the fact that she's been a social reject her whole life is not as harsh as being rejected by someone she thought might actually be romantically interested). She's essentially living what most people experienced in High School or at least College (the only people who avoid this are the people that have enough early success that they are mostly immune to later rejection). This undoubtedly is the hardest social issue she's had with a peer (and maybe more, but we don't know about her family life). But like I was saying, Marigold needs to realize that Angus still cares about her because he IS a friend. When Angus does get back in the picture, he needs to not say the "I'd like to still be friends" but "We are still friends". Perhaps some kind of honesty on his part as to why he rejected her. Honestly, I'd like to know that too... I mean, if I was him I'd be all over that like a teabagger on a dollar. Likely it's because he likes Faye. If it's something else, well, he needs to own up to it (he doesn't see any future in it, she's not 'attractive' to him... honestly, I can't think of anything else, and these are lame...).

tl;dr Carvin over analyzes things.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Shteevie on 05 Apr 2010, 09:50
These are pretty believable reactions from the two characters involved. Marisob is used to less nuanced interactions between people, and Hannerita probably doesn't have much tolerance for non-pragmatism. Hopefully they can still be friends afterwards, because Marigold is going to need someone to help her move.

So Jeph, how was the pepper beer.
Was wondering that myself. I tried a St. Bernardus Abt 12 for the first time this weekend, and I'm certain it won;t be the last.

Was the sweet potato / black pepper beer [which is weird even to type] good enough to recommend by name?

Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 05 Apr 2010, 10:30
And once again, Hanners go boom! (as opposed to BOOM!). I can't say I blame her—as hard a time as Hannelore has trying to have a 'normal' life, to see someone whose only (apparent) problem is she sits in her room all day, who has the kind of friend Hanners had to taser to get (snerk), and who wants to sit around and wallow in her misfortune has to be irritating.

Honestly, I'd like to know that too... I mean, if I was him I'd be all over that like a teabagger on a dollar. Likely it's because he likes Faye. If it's something else, well, he needs to own up to it (he doesn't see any future in it, she's not 'attractive' to him... honestly, I can't think of anything else, and these are lame...).
From the info we've heard from Angus about his and Marigiold's relationship, I can see where Marigold as a romantic prospect has never crossed Angus' mind. My money is on him thinking of Marigold as a 'sister,' or, more likely, a 'kid' whom he really can't relate to. Though the fact that Faye seems to be thawing towards him can't be helping things.

tl;dr Carvin over analyzes things.
OH GOD, NO! Not over-analysis! Anything but that! That's the sign of, the sign of…

…me.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: haikupoet on 05 Apr 2010, 10:44
Marigold is so channeling me right now, except that i tend to think that lots of women tend to be interested so i assume they aren't.

Also, Marigold: you are not fat, you are zaftig. And you compare quite favorably to Faye. Also, you're not ugly, you're just sort of Italian-looking.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Lost Coastlines on 05 Apr 2010, 11:07
And once again, Hanners go boom! (as opposed to BOOM!). I can't say I blame her—as hard a time as Hannelore has trying to have a 'normal' life, to see someone whose only (apparent) problem is she sits in her room all day, who has the kind of friend Hanners had to taser to get (snerk), and who wants to sit around and wallow in her misfortune has to be irritating.

That is her only problem.  If Marigold really thinks she's fat, ugly and pathetic then she could do something about it.  Instead she always chooses the easier option of hiding in her den of self-pity.  Giving into that "woe is me" crap just creates a manipulative passive-aggressive monster.  Good for Hannelore.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Moxie on 05 Apr 2010, 11:25
Perhaps some kind of honesty on his part as to why he rejected her. Honestly, I'd like to know that too... I mean, if I was him I'd be all over that like a teabagger on a dollar. Likely it's because he likes Faye. If it's something else, well, he needs to own up to it (he doesn't see any future in it, she's not 'attractive' to him... honestly, I can't think of anything else, and these are lame...).

Why are those lame? If Angus isn't physically attracted to Marigold, that's not lame that's who he is. Just because he's not doesn't mean no one else is. If he doesn't see any future in it, why should he go for a relationship with her?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Apr 2010, 11:28
Anyone else impressed at how healthy Hanners is being?

This isn't her hesitant "erm" when Marten and Steve were talking about "friggin' women" (1103), and this isn't channeling her mother (1108 for a tough love situation, 1418 for dealing with Marigold). She is being assertive like a skilled normal person, saying in effect "here's the situation, here's what I'm trying to do, here's how you're making it difficult".

Marigirl has just run into one of the traps of being a shy person. Without a diversified group of friends who complement each other, a shy person can expect too many kinds of interaction out of the first friendly person they encounter. The shy person can even mistake friendship for romance if the genders and orientations line up.

She doesn't even have good support from her guild. Remember her complaining that all the social attention went to the members who posted slutty pictures?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Heliphyneau on 05 Apr 2010, 13:54
The conversation/reactions between Hanners and Marigold make complete sense considering both of their emotional states and personalities.  It's certainly gonna take Marigold more than a strip or two to 'get over' her disappointment.  Hanners really is dealing with her OCD issues well -- maybe her concern for Marigold is providing enough of a focus for her to suppress her usual reactions (which likely doesn't fit the reality of OCD, but I can suspend a lil' disbelief for a good story).  Maybe after Marbear's hangover is gone, Hanners can take her to karaoke to help her get over some shyness.

In the last panel, I really like the contrasts in expressions between Hannelore and Marigold vs the posters on the wall.

Apropos of nothing, I wonder if it means anything that all the late-night visitors picked "chocolate" in the poll and the later ones picked the more violent options.

Insomniacs seek comfort?  Or perhaps creatures of the night are more innocuous than one might expect.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: carvin on 05 Apr 2010, 14:32
Perhaps some kind of honesty on his part as to why he rejected her. Honestly, I'd like to know that too... I mean, if I was him I'd be all over that like a teabagger on a dollar. Likely it's because he likes Faye. If it's something else, well, he needs to own up to it (he doesn't see any future in it, she's not 'attractive' to him... honestly, I can't think of anything else, and these are lame...).

Why are those lame? If Angus isn't physically attracted to Marigold, that's not lame that's who he is. Just because he's not doesn't mean no one else is. If he doesn't see any future in it, why should he go for a relationship with her?

When faced with a situation where a girl was not what I expected (long distance, I was young) and not what I then thought was 'attractive'... I changed what I thought was attractive. A change that has lasted 10 years (not to mention, three relationships). I find the concept of rejecting a meaningful relationship because of someone not being attractive lame, to but it mildly. Then again, I have the same opinion when people would do the same because of gender... but that's another thing entirely. Besides, I remember now that he said she was pretty. I guess that's not the same as attractive, but I find it hard that one wouldn't stretch to the other.

As far as no future, it is in itself a good reason. The thing I think would be lame is that it's ridiculous. He's currently chasing a girl who isn't relationship stable, who doesn't necessarily have the ability to love him, there is nothing that would signal that they would be good together other than they enjoy arguing with each other (this isn't sarcasm; this is a good thing to have in a relationship. If you can enjoy the worst thing in a relationship, how bad can it get?). Marigold, on the other hand, seems perfectly capable of devotion, love (though she is likely naive of how love really works), has shown a desire to be flexible, whom he has been flexible with... I could go on.

tl;dr Carvin argues more than needed.

Quote
From the info we've heard from Angus about his and Marigiold's relationship, I can see where Marigold as a romantic prospect has never crossed Angus' mind. My money is on him thinking of Marigold as a 'sister,' or, more likely, a 'kid' whom he really can't relate to. Though the fact that Faye seems to be thawing towards him can't be helping things.

I agree that he doesn't see her as such, but I would figure that a good part of that is because she's been so reserved and shy. And I certainly can see why when she threw herself at him that his reaction (other than 'Woo! Boobs!') was to say no: his reaction was to force himself not to do something he'd regret by processing as he always has. I would hope that after reflection he'd see the potential. I doubt that's what will happen, though.

I don't know if turning into you would be a bad thing... you at least have good taste in avatars.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Apr 2010, 14:50
Is it an obsolete and abandoned cultural idea that getting involved with roommates is a bad idea? If people on the forum believe it, they're not mentioning it.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Kugai on 05 Apr 2010, 14:54
Personally, I think Hanners and Marigold are actually more suited to each other than they recognise at this point.  They are, in the broad terms, the antithesis of each other both personality wise as well as socially (despite her OCD Hanners does have a social life, more now since she met Marten, Faye and Dora).  If the pair of them can get through this, and Hanners can get Marigold to come more out of her shell and actually start likeing herself more, I think the pair of them will actually be good for each other and could become good friends.

Whether anything else comes of that, time - and Jeph - will tell.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 05 Apr 2010, 15:12
Is it an obsolete and abandoned cultural idea that getting involved with roommates is a bad idea? If people on the forum believe it, they're not mentioning it.

I believe, brother! 

[shudders over a 30 year old memory that will haunt him till the day he dies]

Now, can I have an "AMEN!"?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Tuitsuro on 05 Apr 2010, 15:21
Marigold is a classic INTP (http://www.personalitypage.com/INTP.html); I could maybe see Hannelore as an ESFJ (http://www.personalitypage.com/ESFJ.html), which would be the technical antithesis of an INTP, but I think she's probably more of an ENFJ (http://www.personalitypage.com/ENFJ.html) or even an ENTJ (http://www.personalitypage.com/ENTJ.html).
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Apr 2010, 15:24
It's hard to get someone to like herself more.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: sudamerican on 05 Apr 2010, 15:38
Quote
Apropos of nothing, I wonder if it means anything that all the late-night visitors picked "chocolate" in the poll and the later ones picked the more violent options.
My axe is made of chocolate. I use it to cut my bourbon pancakes.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: JackFaerie on 05 Apr 2010, 17:14
Not that Hannelore's reaction isn't understandable, but I think she's showing her OWN naivete there, and I disagree with whoever's saying the outburst is what Marigold needs.  If this was Marigold's third day holed up on her bed? Then, yes. But it's been, what... an hour, two, since she woke up? Hannelore (and half of you, apparently) is going to have to learn that human emotions are also messy. Things DON'T get solved with a single pep speech, you can't cheer someone up just by being supportive sometimes, a hug and a shoulder pat aren't always all you need, and sometimes, although your effort is appreciated and necessary, in the moment, there's nothing you can really do.  Life isn't the movies, people don't magically rebound.

Marigold is allowed a full day of feeling miserable if she wants it.  She's dealing with a lot of things right now:

1) a hangover
2) the embarrassment of having been so physically forward with someone who wasn't interested
3) the embarrassment of having been so emotionally forward with someone who wasn't interested
4) the pain of the realization that her feelings are not returned, and the crumbling of castles in the sky
5) second-guessing herself on everything that would have lead her to think she had a chance
6) confronting the evidence, in hindsight now very apparent, that he was NEVER interested, and all that new embarrassment
7) wondering how she's going to face Angus now

And this is her first time with it all.

I think it makes sense that she'd need the better part of a day to process it before she can even begin to put on a "brave front."

To be honest, I'm kind of disgusted by everyone who's all "she should snap out if it." It is symptomatic of some of the worst things about modern modern instant-gratification culture. Sometimes, people should be allowed to FEEL. And they should be allowed to GRIEVE. And they shouldn't just have to push everything down and be "over it" and "move on" and be "okay" (because anything else makes us, the outsiders, uncomfortable!) all of the time.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Apr 2010, 17:30
There's a relevant distinction between "I'm hurting" and "I'm stupid, ugly, fat, and pathetic".  Hannelore isn't saying "snap out of it", she is saying that she can't stand Marigold hating on herself.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: SleeperCylon on 05 Apr 2010, 17:52
I don't think Angus is only hanging out with Marigold out of pity.  I think he genuinely enjoys her company.  Just, he's one of those suburban/television raised kids who set their romantic expectations way higher than their league.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 05 Apr 2010, 19:51
Marigold is a classic INTP (http://www.personalitypage.com/INTP.html); I could maybe see Hannelore as an ESFJ (http://www.personalitypage.com/ESFJ.html), which would be the technical antithesis of an INTP, but I think she's probably more of an ENFJ (http://www.personalitypage.com/ENFJ.html) or even an ENTJ (http://www.personalitypage.com/ENTJ.html).

Wait, what?  Did you actually read these, in light of the characters?  INTP isn't even close for Marigold.  Just because she can fix a computer and is introverted does NOT make her INTP; She doesn't necessarily "value logic above all else".  She's proven (several times) that she doesn't make decisions based on reason, but rather fear (and other emotions).  The next to last paragraph is most telling;

Quote
The INTP is usually very independent, unconventional, and original. They are not likely to place much value on traditional goals such as popularity and security. They usually have complex characters, and may tend to be restless and temperamental. They are strongly ingenious, and have unconventional thought patterns which allows them to analyze ideas in new ways. Consequently, a lot of scientific breakthroughs in the world have been made by the INTP.

This is SOOO not Marigold.  She's a fan (so much for independent, unconventional, and original); she values traditional notions of pretty and popular WAY too much for her own good; she's neither restless nor temperamental, but rather was reasonably content with her online life (until Angus started drawing her out).  It just doesn't fit!!!

I'm not going to take the time to refute the three you gave for Haners, but none of them fit any better.  There are a few minor points in some of them that work in her character, like controlling her environment, but not enough to classify her as any one of these types.  She is certainly not a "people person", as all of these suggest.  Perhaps she could be, but her mental illness and the distortions that it forces on her life prevent that.  Without the OCD issues, she may fall into one of those classes, but not the way she is now. 

I have to be honest, I have serious issues with real psychology.  And if I remember correctly, this Jungian classification system has been pretty well abandoned in practice, there are just too many personality types and too few boxes.  But damn, stop spreading half understood misinterpretations, alright? 

It might as well be fucking astrology! 

Yeesh!   :-P
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Tuitsuro on 05 Apr 2010, 20:06
Wow.  Way to take things waaaaay too seriously.  Myers-Briggs is pretty much the businessman's astrology chart, it's not supposed to tell you how your personality works in minute detail.  IIRC I took this test in a collegiate business class along with one which asked us to pick a personality trait based on the type of dessert we'd choose, given the option of 8.  ( I chose lemon meringue, FYI. )  They don't honestly mean jack shit since a piece of paper can't tell you how you make decisions in life, but since we're talking about personalities I thought I'd bring something interesting to the table instead of just hanging around with my dick out trying to figure out how best to pair the OCD girl with the shut-in one. 

But hey, if you disagree with my assessment of either Hannelore or Marigold, feel free to put yourself in their place and take the thing yourself. (http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.asp)
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Sorflakne on 05 Apr 2010, 20:25
I'm an INTJ...apparently if enough of us got together, we could take over and rule the world.  It's probably a good thing we're the rarest of the Myers-Briggs types and not prone to working with others.

Edit:  Ah shit...I just took the test for the hell of it and I came out as an INTP...wtf is wrong with me?? :?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: akronnick on 05 Apr 2010, 20:34
/snip
 Myers-Briggs is pretty much the businessman's astrology chart

You do understand that astrology is complete and utter bullshit, right? Because you seem to be saying that this system is like astrology but still useful about for making decisions about people.

There is a word for that sort of behaviour, it's called 'discrimination.'

Judging people by anything other than what they do is wrong. Whether it's based on race, religion, nationality, sexual orientation, star-sign, blood type  or some bullshit pop-psychology personality profile, it's still evil.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: jeanramone on 05 Apr 2010, 20:35
I'm an INTJ...apparently if enough of us got together, we could take over and rule the world.  It's probably a good thing we're the rarest of the Myers-Briggs types.

Yes apparently I'm one of those aswell, good ego-boost! Not sure how much faith I put in the online test though :P
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Tuitsuro on 05 Apr 2010, 20:49
Judging people by anything other than what they do is wrong. Whether it's based on race, religion, nationality, sexual orientation, star-sign, blood type  or some bullshit pop-psychology personality profile, it's still evil.

Fuck yeah, about time I was called evil.  Must be doing my job right!   :evil:
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 05 Apr 2010, 21:21
I'm an INTJ...apparently if enough of us got together, we could take over and rule the world.  It's probably a good thing we're the rarest of the Myers-Briggs types.
I'm INFJ, and I was told 'we' were the rarest types*. Good thing, too, if 'we're' all like me.

Not that Hannelore's reaction isn't understandable, but I think she's showing her OWN naivete there, and I disagree with whoever's saying the outburst is what Marigold needs.  
I don't know that Marigold needs being yelled at, but I, as I said, I understand Hanners' impulse to yell. And if that yelling is what helps her stay in the room, then it's needed, as I'm very afraid Marigold will, left unattended, never come out again, figuratively speaking, of course (I hope). Sitting with her, taking care of her, yelling at her, all of it's attention. Alone time, in my experience, works better for someone who is normally social, but has to take a break to get him/herself together. This isn't such a situation; Marigold seems more likely to use that kind of time to yank her hole in after her.

I agree that he doesn't see her as such, but I would figure that a good part of that is because she's been so reserved and shy. And I certainly can see why when she threw herself at him that his reaction (other than 'Woo! Boobs!') was to say no: his reaction was to force himself not to do something he'd regret by processing as he always has. I would hope that after reflection he'd see the potential. I doubt that's what will happen, though.
Probably not. You likely know this (but here goes anyway); most people tend to 'slot' other individuals early on, and it too often takes tantamount to an act of god to get them to re-think such characterizations, partly because the brain, it is lazy. And Angus, he's a good guy, but the reflective sort, he isn't. Then again, it would be an *ahem* interesting (in the fake Chinese sense) turn of events if these happenings did change Angus' way of thinking—for Faye, anyway.

But Marigold is going to have to be much more outgoing, I suspect, to be attractive to Angus. He may say 'witty banter' is what draws him, but what I'm really getting is that the strength/confidence/etc. such banter implies (on a surface level, anyway—god knows it's not actually true of Faye, although she's getting better) is what he likes. Marigold isn't really there yet, and may never be. Not everyone is, which is a good thing, I think. Viva la difference!

And last, but not least, I'll say it again: when it comes to romance, how many people get it right the first time? It would be nice, I suppose, but it rarely happens. Such is life in "Arda marred." (Drat Melkor, anyway.)

I don't know if turning into you would be a bad thing... you at least have good taste in avatars.
The tiny detractor in my head wants some words with you.


*I'm beginning to think MB tester'll tell you anything to get you to… you know… take more tests. And I thought it all meant something.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: carvin on 05 Apr 2010, 21:45
M-B is essentially crock, and it is indeed astrology for businessmen. I don't think, though, it's even a method for hate... though, it can be a method for false pride. It essentially is a test that is good at telling you what you want to hear.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Tuitsuro on 05 Apr 2010, 22:09
Edit:  Ah shit...I just took the test for the hell of it and I came out as an INTP...wtf is wrong with me?? :?

For the record, the last time I took it I was an EXXJ.  Meaning that for the intent of the test, I was dead center for the middle two, and one off from dead center on the end two.  So I was then told that because of this abnormality, I could then be any personality I chose.  Neat.   :roll:
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: LeeC on 05 Apr 2010, 22:16
Just, he's one of those suburban/television raised kids who set their romantic expectations way higher than their league.
In my experience there is no such thing as leagues.

astrology is fun but some people take it waayyy to seriously.

I agree Hanners is not saying snap out of it, She is just getting fed up with the self-loathing that it's making it super uncomfortable with her on top the mountain of her OCD she is resisting.  I just cant wait at this point for either Marigold confronting angus, or angus and faye talking again (hell just him going to the CoD would be interesting).

Personally, I think Hanners and Marigold are actually more suited to each other than they recognise at this point.  They are, in the broad terms, the antithesis of each other both personality wise as well as socially (despite her OCD Hanners does have a social life, more now since she met Marten, Faye and Dora).  If the pair of them can get through this, and Hanners can get Marigold to come more out of her shell and actually start likeing herself more, I think the pair of them will actually be good for each other and could become good friends.

Whether anything else comes of that, time - and Jeph - will tell.
I am confused, are you talking about just friends or are you still holding out for a Mari-Hanners hook up? Suck it Shippers 1492 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1492) was suppose to quite them I thought.

(http://www.offresonance.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/double-facepalm.jpg)
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: ecstaticjoy on 05 Apr 2010, 22:56
Chocolate if I'm being honest.

Wow, Hannelore's tits defy gravity. Poor Marigold. Why do Faye and Marigold think they're fat? I think they are getting a complex because they're the only ones who are not heroine-addict skinny in QC. Draw more fat people, Jeph. Before Mar-bear commits suicide.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Apr 2010, 22:57
Marigirl needs an outside reference now. Left to her own company, well, she's pretty toxic company for herself right now. Whatever Hanners says out loud, her presence is saying "You matter, someone cares, you are worth my time". And it's working. Marigold went from lying down to sitting up: even as she was verbally acting like Hannelore's bluntness was distressing her, her body language said she was improving.
/me has a little voice in my head saying "they're not real"
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Apr 2010, 22:58
It's not just Faye who thinks she's fat. Amanda called her "squishy".
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: snubnose on 06 Apr 2010, 00:41
WHERE is the new comic ?  :cry:

I dont have a gun, axe, remote control, bouron or any other kind of alcohol, and I dont have the equipment to make pancakes either.

Yes, that leaves chocolate.

I actually envy women a bit when it comes to weight. Women can get quite heavy before they actually start to look ugly. For men, this point is much earlier. Big chest just looks bad for a man. Women first start getting all curvy everywhere. Delicious ! :angel:
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Beaten by Nuns on 06 Apr 2010, 02:04
Holy shit, Marten wore a different color hoodie!
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: akronnick on 06 Apr 2010, 02:07
Marten better be careful, Faye is right next to him holding a hot pot of coffee after all.

Also, drinkin' coffee right out of the pot, behind the counter, where customers can see you, that ain't legal either.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: westrim on 06 Apr 2010, 02:13
Marten better be careful, Faye is right next to him holding a hot pot of coffee after all.

Also, drinkin' coffee right out of the pot, behind the counter, where customers can see you, that ain't legal either.

I was presuming that this is still night (as Hannelore is still at Marigold's) and for some reason they all jones'd for java and went over to the shop, thus no customers are around.

Still, not exactly sanitary.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: LTK on 06 Apr 2010, 02:56
I love the facial expressions in this one!
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Y on 06 Apr 2010, 02:59
I think it would be early morning, as Faye said she couldn't sleep to Angus. Meaning the rest would probably have slept, but Faye didn't sleep much if any at all, in which case she's awake for more than 24 hours, thus requiring the caffeine. Adding to that that she drank bourbon and haven't slept it off yet. She will probably have difficulties staying up in the afternoon, as the caffeine will crash down.

Anyone know where Momo went? Well she said in advance she couldn't hold her head.



Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 06 Apr 2010, 03:41
First reaction to Marten - "You're trying too hard man."

Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: akronnick on 06 Apr 2010, 04:01
I miss raven.


Sorry, just doin' a little archive binging and got to the one with the labcoat.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 06 Apr 2010, 04:27
Wow.  Way to take things waaaaay too seriously.  Myers-Briggs is pretty much the businessman's astrology chart, it's not supposed to tell you how your personality works in minute detail.  IIRC I took this test in a collegiate business class along with one which asked us to pick a personality trait based on the type of dessert we'd choose, given the option of 8.  ( I chose lemon meringue, FYI. )  They don't honestly mean jack shit since a piece of paper can't tell you how you make decisions in life, but since we're talking about personalities I thought I'd bring something interesting to the table instead of just hanging around with my dick out trying to figure out how best to pair the OCD girl with the shut-in one. 

But hey, if you disagree with my assessment of either Hannelore or Marigold, feel free to put yourself in their place and take the thing yourself. (http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.asp)

No, no and no.  I'm not the one who posted these in the first place - I just read them, and it ticked me off, as most pop psychobabble does.  And I read the homepage - if anything takes itself too seriously, it's this typing system! 

I probably overreacted, but I'm really glad to see you realize it's BS, too.  Too many people take shit like this way too seriously!   

Although I think if it made its way into an episode of The Office, personality typing might just get its due...  :laugh:
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: sudamerican on 06 Apr 2010, 06:07
Quote
Women can get quite heavy before they actually start to look ugly. For men, this point is much earlier. Big chest just looks bad for a man. Women first start getting all curvy everywhere. Delicious !
I wholeheartedly agree.

And marten is indeed trying too hard
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 06 Apr 2010, 06:38
And as to our poll:

How do YOU discharge your fears?

With a gun    - 9 (14.1%)
With an axe    - 8 (12.5%)
With a remote control    - 4 (6.3%)
With a bottle of bourbon    - 13 (20.3%)
Pancakes    - 8 (12.5%)
Chocolate    - 22 (34.4%)

Total Voters: 64
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Sorflakne on 06 Apr 2010, 06:59
Marten's obliviousness is almost scary.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: LeeC on 06 Apr 2010, 07:00
Marten's obliviousness is almost scary.
obliviousness to what? his impending doom?  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 06 Apr 2010, 07:34
I think he knew that a beating was imminent before those words even exited his vocal cords.  But sometimes he must feel the need to ride the edge.  Or he just wants two women he finds attractive to beat him
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: LeeC on 06 Apr 2010, 07:55
Marigold, are you thinking what im thinking (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DaXJmo9cro)
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: AngryCallCenterAgent on 06 Apr 2010, 07:58
Marten just inserted foot (A) into mouth (B).

Where I come from, we call maneuver the IKEA.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 06 Apr 2010, 08:12
Marten's expression in the last panel tells me that he thinks, whatever may follow, that it was totally worth it. I concur.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: LeeC on 06 Apr 2010, 08:14
Marten just inserted foot (A) into mouth (B).

Where I come from, we call maneuver the IKEA.
that at the end of it all your always missing a few pieces or have a few left over?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 06 Apr 2010, 09:01
How should I take this strip?

Did Marten start with a generality, then realize it applied to him, and cover with self-mockery?

Are the girls planning to hit him because he's being insensitive to Marigold, because he's laying it on too thick, because it's a retroactive rejection of Faye, or some other reason?

Why didn't Faye pour the coffee over him? It looks like she might not have had any left...
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Near Lurker on 06 Apr 2010, 09:39
Hooking up with roommates is, indeed, a terrible idea; this is the fundamental flaw in the institution of marriage.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: TheHappyBerry on 06 Apr 2010, 10:28
How should I take this strip?

Did Marten start with a generality, then realize it applied to him, and cover with self-mockery?

Are the girls planning to hit him because he's being insensitive to Marigold, because he's laying it on too thick, because it's a retroactive rejection of Faye, or some other reason?

Why didn't Faye pour the coffee over him? It looks like she might not have had any left...

I interpreted it the first way.  The first statement was him stupidly saying the first thing that came into his brain, and the he followed that by attempting to cover it up, hoping they would think it was sarcasm or something.  Sadly for him, it doesn't seem to be working.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Heliphyneau on 06 Apr 2010, 11:05
Marten's expression in the last panel tells me that he thinks, whatever may follow, that it was totally worth it. I concur.

I, too, concur.  With your statement and with Marten's presumed assessment that it was totally worth it, of course.  Marten's last line, combined with his expression, made me literally lol.  Self-aware self-deprecation ftw!

And it's morning.  Hanners went to see Marigold in the morning, which is why Marigold was waking up instead of still sobbing.  Granted, it was a wake-and-sob, but still.  Also, Angus changed clothes, again, indicating he's likely headed to work or out for coffee or whatever else he does with his time.

Faye drinking direct from the pot, while funny, is gross.  I mean, damn girl, we know you need the caffeine, but don't burn your lips off doing it and maybe don't "treat" the customers to your backwash.  Ew.  Although some customers might pay extra for that . . .
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 06 Apr 2010, 11:17
How should I take this strip?

Did Marten start with a generality, then realize it applied to him, and cover with self-mockery?

Are the girls planning to hit him because he's being insensitive to Marigold, because he's laying it on too thick, because it's a retroactive rejection of Faye, or some other reason?

Why didn't Faye pour the coffee over him? It looks like she might not have had any left...
I don't think Marten was rejecting Faye—I think he saw the implications of Dora's comment, realized they could be applied to him, and self-deprecated: hence the bolded 'terrible.' Then, noticing the reaction–specifically, instead of "we didn't mean you, Marty" or "I just don't think Angus and Marigold would work, that's all," hostility, Marten dug in deeper. Might as well enjoy it, in for a penny, or a pummel, and all that.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: michi-love on 06 Apr 2010, 12:49
Is it just me or does something about Marten's expression in that last panel remind anyone else of Penelope's mid-mind-s'plosion?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 06 Apr 2010, 13:25
I'm not seeing it, at least not at first. What in particular?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Kugai on 06 Apr 2010, 15:35
Marigold, are you thinking what im thinking (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DaXJmo9cro)


Ummmm I think so Bwain, but how do we get Desmond into a Tutu?

 :-D



Ahh, terminal irony - What happens just before your girlfriend and her friend beat you with Malaysian Battle Spatulas.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: sudamerican on 06 Apr 2010, 17:13
Marigold, are you thinking what im thinking (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DaXJmo9cro)
Suicide!
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 06 Apr 2010, 19:47
Is it just me or does something about Marten's expression in that last panel remind anyone else of Penelope's mid-mind-s'plosion?

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2713/4498996882_5874622256_o.png)

I had to. 

It's the eyes, I think, and the slight upward tilt. 
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 06 Apr 2010, 19:50

Ummmm I think so Bwain, but how do we get Desmond into a Tutu?

 :-D


Oh god, I read that as Bwian for a moment...

"Centuwion, Welease Bwian!" 

 :roll:
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: LeeC on 06 Apr 2010, 20:18

Ummmm I think so Bwain, but how do we get Desmond into a Tutu?

 :-D


Oh god, I read that as Bwian for a moment...

"Centuwion, Welease Bwian!" 

 :roll:
stwike him centuwion and thwow him to the floow!
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: jeanramone on 06 Apr 2010, 20:21

Ummmm I think so Bwain, but how do we get Desmond into a Tutu?

 :-D


Oh god, I read that as Bwian for a moment...

"Centuwion, Welease Bwian!" 

 :roll:
stwike him centuwion and thwow him to the floow!

This thread is now about Monty Python appreciation.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: LeeC on 06 Apr 2010, 20:40

Ummmm I think so Bwain, but how do we get Desmond into a Tutu?

 :-D


Oh god, I read that as Bwian for a moment...

"Centuwion, Welease Bwian!" 

 :roll:
stwike him centuwion and thwow him to the floow!

This thread is now about Monty Python appreciation.
this thwead has spiwit!
whats that?
spiwit!
ah yes he did sir.
 :|
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Sorflakne on 06 Apr 2010, 21:46
Your mother was a hamster and your father smelled of alder berries.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 06 Apr 2010, 22:00
*smacks everyone with a large, recently deceased fish*

Now cut that out! We don't do this sort of nonsense until Friday night. You know, when no one gives a damn.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: michi-love on 06 Apr 2010, 22:01
I'm not sure what it is about it - I suppose it's the eyes, but it just struck me when I saw it...

I would say what it is, except for the fact I cannot remember which strip it was, or when in the story arc it took place during... which is incredibly annoying, by the by.

I just know that I looked at that and expected his head to crack open and all the rainbow/etc to blast out.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: michi-love on 06 Apr 2010, 22:02
Mawage is wot bwings us togeder tooday. Mawage, that bwessed awangment, that dweam wifin a dweam... And wuv, tru wuv, will fowow you foweva... So tweasure your wuv.

... because I will never hear a r/w mix up without thinking that speech... (and yes. This includes Elmer Fudd.)
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: zagraf on 06 Apr 2010, 22:19
New strip is up.

Marigold actually made a joke about the situation. Looks like she'll pull through this okay.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Near Lurker on 06 Apr 2010, 22:20
Protip: They're both lying.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Kugai on 06 Apr 2010, 22:27

Ummmm I think so Bwain, but how do we get Desmond into a Tutu?

 :-D


Oh god, I read that as Bwian for a moment...

"Centuwion, Welease Bwian!" 

 :roll:
stwike him centuwion and thwow him to the floow!

This thread is now about Monty Python appreciation.
this thwead has spiwit!
whats that?
spiwit!
ah yes he did sir.
 :|

Yeth. 
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Moxie on 06 Apr 2010, 22:28
eesh, Hanners is creepy  *shudders*
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Kugai on 06 Apr 2010, 22:29
The scary thing is that you don't know which one of them is more likely to do the deed.


The Poster behind Hanners is perfectly placed too.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: zagraf on 06 Apr 2010, 22:35
Protip: They're both lying.

Protip? What's a Protip?

"For good service, 15-20%, higher for exceptional service."

Thank you; I'm here all week; try the fish.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: JD on 06 Apr 2010, 22:36
Protip? What's a Protip?

A tip that has lost it's amateur status.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Lost Coastlines on 06 Apr 2010, 22:38
I'm calling Hannelore's bluff.  Buffalo Bill was far too messy for her to emulate.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: JD on 06 Apr 2010, 22:39
Was about to call that reference.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Tuitsuro on 06 Apr 2010, 22:40
There's the old Hannelore I adore!
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 06 Apr 2010, 22:45
She never left!
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 06 Apr 2010, 23:08
I agree with zagraf; if she can joke about it, Marigold can get over it. And all she has to do is ask Dora, Marten—anyone but Sven, I'd guess—to know she's just stepped into a very, very large boat. As for Hanners, yep, time to down that Ativan. She's been a trooper, though—surely she's earned a little crack-up time now.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: St.Clair on 06 Apr 2010, 23:53
Thank you, Hanners.  That's very reassuring.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: snubnose on 07 Apr 2010, 00:20
Hanners rocks !  :-D

But todays poll is kinda boring.  :-P Seriously, Pancakes is the ONLY funny answer !
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Mr_Rose on 07 Apr 2010, 03:31
Thank you, Hanners.  That's very reassuring.
The correct response is:
Aww, you're not?! *sadface*
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 07 Apr 2010, 03:51
It's good to have clearly defined limits in your friendship.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Mad Cat on 07 Apr 2010, 04:34
But she might don one of her bunny suits prior to heeding the advice of the giant rapping penis who tells her, "I'm D.J. Phallus and I'm here to say, stab your friends. Stab them with a knife."
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 07 Apr 2010, 05:07
She has a one piece with plunging neckline, puffy tail and long ears?  Why weren't we informed?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 07 Apr 2010, 06:01
And your poll previous:

Hooking up with your roommate...
...is, indeed, a terrible idea    - 17 (27.4%)
...is okay when you're desperate.    - 6 (9.7%)
...is how I met my current boyfriend/girlfriend.    - 0 (0%)
...is how my parents met up.    - 0 (0%)
...is how my parents had me!    - 2 (3.2%)
...means you have to share your pancakes.    - 37 (59.7%)

Total Voters: 62

Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Sorflakne on 07 Apr 2010, 06:23
I knew it; Hanners really is a closet homicidal maniac :evil:
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Blyss on 07 Apr 2010, 08:20
I knew it; Hanners really is a closet homicidal maniac :evil:

Closet...?


Hanners rawks so hard.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Kross on 07 Apr 2010, 08:23
I'm calling Hannelore's bluff.  Buffalo Bill was far too messy for her to emulate.

I see your Buffalo Bill and raise you Ed Gein. He actually made a "female suit" out of the skin of women, amongst other things. Pretty much every fictional psychopath/serial killer in film is based on that twisted motherfucker.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 07 Apr 2010, 08:54
I voted against DNA testing, and I can understand most of the other options. But "Not to spy on Marigold with a high-power telescope"? That's just crazy talk. I mean, in a city, what else is a high-powered telescope* for?

*Or binoculars, zoom lens (http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x26l9d_rod-stewart-infatuation_music), what have you.

Edit: now that I think about it, Hanners and the Mod One do have similar hairstyles.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Mad Cat on 07 Apr 2010, 10:20
She has a one piece with plunging neckline, puffy tail and long ears?  Why weren't we informed?
I was thinkiing more along the lines of this bunny suit:
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/Bunny_suit.jpg)
Which we've seen her use:
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1416
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 07 Apr 2010, 10:51
I prefer the one I was thinking of. 
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: douggerel on 07 Apr 2010, 11:05
At least Hannelore is up front about her dermal fixation.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 07 Apr 2010, 11:43
I prefer the one I was thinking of. 

Hear, hear!  Although Haners may have some difficulty filling one out.  Maybe if Marigold were to borrow it..? 

Oh, and eggs for breakfast are a much better option than pancakes after a night of (fine) bourbon.  You need the protien for speedier recovery. 

That is, if your stomach agrees. 
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 07 Apr 2010, 15:05
The night my brother became of legal drinking age he and his buddies went out to celebrate.  About an hour after "Last Call" my Dad was awakened by the door bell.  There on the porch was my brother, wasted.  Dad brought him to the upstairs bathroom where my brother proceeded to vomit for about 2 hours.  Then he crawled into bed.

Next morning my Dad woke him up at 9:00 AM, so that he could have the breakfast of bacon and eggs before getting to Church for Sunday service.

Dad's rationale -"Man enough to drink yourself stupid, man enough to get up the next morning and live up to your responsibilities." (the family was the door greeters that Sunday)

Funny, my brother made sure never to tie one on to the point where he couldn't function the next day ever again.

And I, I got confirmation that my Dad did indeed have a twisted sense of humour.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 07 Apr 2010, 16:23
I see nothing twisted there.  The best learning is done the hard way! 
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: JackFaerie on 07 Apr 2010, 17:05
Am I off by one, or was Wednesday's comic never posted?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: akronnick on 07 Apr 2010, 18:46
You're off by one, 1636 was Monday's, the current one is 1638 for Wednesday.

Monday and Tuesday went up pretty late even by Jeph's standards, and Wednesday went up closer to the regular time.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: MIB4u on 07 Apr 2010, 19:25
what really irks me:
Marigold promised something that happened to her. duh. we all know that.
but! is the same true for what Hannelore promised...?! O_O
...so...scary...
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 07 Apr 2010, 20:04
what really irks me:
Marigold promised not to do something that happened to her she did to someone else. duh. we all know that.
but! is the same true for what Hannelore promised...?! O_O
...so...scary...

She's just promising not to follow where her mind sometimes wanders. 

Her mind should try herder to stay out of those neighborhoods, though. 
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Shadic on 07 Apr 2010, 21:54
Well. There go the slashers.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Moxie on 07 Apr 2010, 21:56
Absolutely LOVE Marten's face in the last panel. For whatever reason, that just seems to sum up Marten.  :laugh:
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: frankwolftown on 07 Apr 2010, 21:56
Who is Cosette?  Is he dating someone?   :?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Moxie on 07 Apr 2010, 21:59
Yeah, Cosette is the accident-prone girl he is dating.

Edit: A comic (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1547) with Cosette in it.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 07 Apr 2010, 21:59
Well, it's common knowledge that a lot of men get turned on by lesbian sex.  But to be honest, I don't know of many (alright, any) women who'd be turned on by gay male sex...

Of course, most of the women I know are lesbians.  Their consensus is that male bodies are icky, so not fun to watch.  


Wait, that makes me the male equivalent of a fag hag, doesn't it?  Is there a name for that?  

Any suggestions?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: akronnick on 07 Apr 2010, 22:01
Damn! Those two turned on Marten in a hurry!

Who is Cosette?  Is he dating someone?   :?



Cosette is Steve's (possibly paralyzed (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1554)) significant other.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Watched Pot on 07 Apr 2010, 22:06
Well, it's common knowledge that a lot of men get turned on by lesbian sex.  But to be honest, I don't know of many (alright, any) women who'd be turned on by gay male sex...
At the risk of pissing off the sizable anime contingent on the board....isn't that what yaoi is all about? I have only a vague awareness of Japanese animation/manga/etc and very little interest in learning more, but I thought there was, in fact, enough interest in drawings of good-lookin' dudes kissing to support a niche market....and Marten and Steve are drawings, after all.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: frankwolftown on 07 Apr 2010, 22:06
Damn! Those two turned on Marten in a hurry!

Who is Cosette?  Is he dating someone?   :?



Cosette is Steve's (possibly paralyzed (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1554)) significant other.

Oh yeah!  I completely forgot about that.  
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: JackFaerie on 07 Apr 2010, 22:12
Well, it's common knowledge that a lot of men get turned on by lesbian sex.  But to be honest, I don't know of many (alright, any) women who'd be turned on by gay male sex...

Really? Because I know PLENTY. Including lesbians. (A lot of lesbians write m/m romance/sex fanfiction. Not kidding. Or maybe that should be "it's not that uncommon for authors of m/m fanfiction to be lesbians.")

Also, this is not restricted to comics:

http://www.emo-corner.com/emo-boys-kissing/    http://www.emo-corner.com/forums/index.php?autocom=gallery&req=si&img=9890

And just ask any female fan of movies like "Velvet Goldmine" what their favorite scene is...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvJQe4gTAr8

(read the comments)
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: jeanramone on 07 Apr 2010, 22:12
Well, it's common knowledge that a lot of men get turned on by lesbian sex.  But to be honest, I don't know of many (alright, any) women who'd be turned on by gay male sex...
At the risk of pissing off the sizable anime contingent on the board....isn't that what yaoi is all about? I have only a vague awareness of Japanese animation/manga/etc and very little interest in learning more, but I thought there was, in fact, enough interest in drawings of good-lookin' dudes kissing to support a niche market....and Marten and Steve are drawings, after all.

Yaoi - turning girls on since...well whenever it started.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 07 Apr 2010, 22:12
Damn! Those two turned on Marten in a hurry!
Who is Cosette?  Is he dating someone?   :?
Cosette is Steve's (possibly paralyzed (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1554)) significant other.
Oh yeah!  I completely forgot about that.  
She's also not paralyzed, according to Steve. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1556)
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 07 Apr 2010, 22:19
....and Marten and Steve are drawings, after all.

Blasphemy!  Shun the nonbeliever! 

[SHUNNN...SHUNNN... Hey Charlie, we're on a bridge, Charlie!]
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: lunakitten on 07 Apr 2010, 22:21
Well, it's common knowledge that a lot of men get turned on by lesbian sex.  But to be honest, I don't know of many (alright, any) women who'd be turned on by gay male sex...

Of course, most of the women I know are lesbians.  Their consensus is that male bodies are icky, so not fun to watch.  


Wait, that makes me the male equivalent of a fag hag, doesn't it?  Is there a name for that?  

Any suggestions?
I know a LOT of straight and bi women who are REALLY turned on by the thought/sight of 2 men together. Me included. Possibly why I only ever dated bi men...
And according to Margaret Cho, you'd be a Dutch boy (...finger in the dike).
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 07 Apr 2010, 22:26
I said I know a lot of lesbians, not that I know a lot of lesbians...
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Near Lurker on 07 Apr 2010, 22:33
Compromise: Call Cosette.  See if she minds.

If she's like 90% of the college-age girls I know, she won't.

Then, make the fuck out with Marten.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Jeff7 on 07 Apr 2010, 22:34
I guess Marten just needs to get himself warmed up again, and in costume for a proper performance.

Oh, sousuke-kuuuun.


Or possibly... (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1565)
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: akronnick on 07 Apr 2010, 22:37
Compromise: Call Cosette.  See if she minds. she's into it

Fixed
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: bhtooefr on 07 Apr 2010, 22:50
Wait, that makes me the male equivalent of a fag hag, doesn't it?  Is there a name for that?  

Any suggestions?

Lesbro (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lesbro), if you don't mind the usage of "bro."
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: tdm88 on 07 Apr 2010, 23:07
Quote
Well, it's common knowledge that a lot of men get turned on by lesbian sex.  But to be honest, I don't know of many (alright, any) women who'd be turned on by gay male sex...


 :-D Here's one.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 07 Apr 2010, 23:12
See, this is why these WCT's with polls are hard to do - coming up with daily polls.

Other things Hannelore needs to promise:

Not to spy on Marigold with a high-power telescope.    - 6 (13.6%)
Not to test her blood sample for DNA abnormalities.    - 17 (38.6%)
Not to scream in agony if she hugs her again.    - 3 (6.8%)
Not to go postal if she forgets to leave pocky on the floor again.    - 1 (2.3%)
Pancakes for breakfast.    - 6 (13.6%)
To be there for you when the rain starts to fall.    - 11 (25%)

Total Voters: 44
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: snubnose on 07 Apr 2010, 23:38
Ok, now I'm adding to the list of things not to do in life:

- Dont hook up with Dora or someone like Dora. Just dont.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Kugai on 08 Apr 2010, 00:27
Marten's face is classic.

You can just hear his internal monologue.


'When, oh when will I learn to keep my mouth shut!'
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: themacnut on 08 Apr 2010, 01:09
Ok, now I'm adding to the list of things not to do in life:

- Dont hook up with Dora or someone like Dora. Just dont.


Yeah cause next thing you know you'll find yourself coerced into making out with another guy...of course you could always say "Hell TO the NO!" to such demands, assuming you've got the spine.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: AngryCallCenterAgent on 08 Apr 2010, 01:13
Once again with the IKEA maneuver. Look's like Marten's still got foot-in-mouth disease, only this time it's "insert Steve's tongue (A) into Marten's piehole (B)".

On another note, I approve of emergency booze. (Where's my emergency tequila? *rummages*)
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: snubnose on 08 Apr 2010, 01:15
STOP giving me such mental images AAAAAH THE PAIN !!!!  :x :x :x :x
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: LTK on 08 Apr 2010, 01:35
STEEEEEEVE
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: akronnick on 08 Apr 2010, 02:33
Raven :(
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: no one special on 08 Apr 2010, 02:41
The funny thing is, I knew what Dora's exact reaction would be before I even saw panel four.  Why?  Because I once had a bisexual girlfriend who reacted the exact same way to the exact same thing. 

This was years ago.  We were at a party of people we knew, and most people were pretty drunk.  One of the guys there was gay, but pretty much kissed anyone when drunk.  He was going around doing his thing, and at some point he wandered over our direction.  I'd never kissed a guy before (as I am straight) but drunk logic figured "what the hell, let's try it once!"  So I made out with him, tongue and all.  My girlfriend flipped out (in a positive way) and was floored, saying she how incredible freakin' AWESOME and HOT it was.

I can only think of two other girlfriends I've had who would've reacted the same way - both of them were bisexual too.  Dunno if it's just bisexual girls that go for that, or just certain girls regardless of orientation, but all the straight girls I've dated would have been grossed the f*** out.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: 0kamisama on 08 Apr 2010, 03:29
Dora's reaction was easy enough to predict, but I was surprised to see that Faye seems to be developing a liking for guy-on-guy action as well. I almost expected her to bail for the storage room or get the spray bottle for Dora. Nice to see that she's starting to loosen up a little more.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: akronnick on 08 Apr 2010, 03:34
I'm not sure Faye is into the hot guy-on-guy action as much as Marten's humiliation.

Faye is all about the humiliation (of others.)
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: tomart on 08 Apr 2010, 03:59
Just trying to counter some of the hating on casual, mutual-consent makeouts. Steve has a right to his opinion*, despite Faye's obnoxious and hateful "douuuuuche." She's turned from my favorite character into a bully; like, why can't Marten voice a sly, ironic feeling (1637) about all the drawn-out shit she put him through, without her unquestioned self-righteous right to start hitting him AGAIN? & now getting Dora in on it too? Marten's her own personal punching bag, forever? He's not allowed to make a joke about something he suffered through, but she can stab everyone with her rapier wit?

Aubrey: "So a hottie shows up on your doorstep, offers you a little play, and you refuse her?"     Davan: "Pretty much"  
Aubrey: "Were you visited by the ghost of Christmas stupid last night?"   Davan: "I just didn't want to take advantage of her"
Aubrey: "If a woman comes to you and says, "Let's have communion. My hoochie is the holy wafer. Eat of my body," you don't say "No, that's not right because I don't want to hurt your feelings." She doesn't want you to care about her. She wants sexing, Davan!"
http://www.somethingpositive.net/sp12172004.shtml

* Apparently based on much more real-world experience than Faye's knee-jerk name-calling.

You may now return to your tittilating discussion of what excites lesbian/bi women, already in progress.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: WhyNot on 08 Apr 2010, 04:45
And the panel not shown (yet), is the one in which Steve or Marten say "Ladies first" or something to the effect or we can refer to the scene in American Pie 2 when the male cast sneak into the house they are painting, hide and get caught and the girls are all like "You want us to do it? Put a show on for us" deal.

And I do agree with what most have said, that Dora's reaction was very predictible.

I do disagree with "tomart" about Faye becoming a bully.  She's been burned/hurt by Sven so she's still a bit angry about it all and thinks that guys shouldn't be taking advantage of drunk women even if they themselve are drunk...which Steve isn't while having the conversation.  Maybe if it had been Steve and not Angus and Steve did sleep with Marigold she (Faye) wouldn't have said "Doooouche" since he too would have been drunk and not of ratinal mind...I think I sorta said that already.  Time to go, already repeating myself...time for meds!!!!
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: tomart on 08 Apr 2010, 05:12
Wait a minute; I already take serious issue with Faye's "being burned/hurt by Sven".  It was made clear they weren't an item, and besides, he didn't seem to plan to do it with that singer. And then he was honest, and was punished for that, too. I feel that her hurt was mostly her own doing, misunderstanding (deluding herself about) the relationship they had (...any resemblance to Marigold's hurt being due to her self-delusion with Angus?  We might have a theme, or trope, here.)

As for "taking advantage", that can go either way. Women take advantage too (le gasp!)  You're right, Faye is still angry about it, and quick to judge and condemn. Too quick for my taste, and I can see hunger for Marty's humiliation in her eyes, and her demand, "Shut up and drink." (to one of her best friends...!?) And that's sad; I've suffered from bullies, and to see my formerly favorite character turn into one... sickens me. And hitting Marten, like the nicest guy ever; I estimate she's already hit him about five times too many, and I thought that shit was long over. If she wants to start doing it again (still for no good reason!) then I think it's time someone started hitting HER, just as hard, to show her what it's like.

As for her possibly not trashing Steve if he had been the one with Marigold, see panel 1.

I think the best outcome would have been if I'd been the one Marigold took her chance with.   :-D
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: littlefox on 08 Apr 2010, 05:56
Actually, I don't think this Faye reaction has to do with Sven. There's a difference between a woman being like "let's hook up, no feelings involved, it'll be just for fun" and her being like "I have feelings for you, let's make looooove."
Marigold explicitly says, "I think we're more than [friends]" -- I think it's clear to all of us from her interaction with Angus that she does have feelings for him. He realizes this, and realizes how mean it would be to take advantage of her in that situation because he DOESN'T have feelings for her (in fact, he pretty obviously has feelings for someone else entirely [Faye], so it's double-mean).

However, doin' it with a woman who just wants sex (and makes that clear) isn't "disrespectful," as Davan of SP would have us believe -- although I think Davan, of both strip and real life, has probably learned that lesson by now.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 08 Apr 2010, 06:24
Wait, that makes me the male equivalent of a fag hag, doesn't it?  Is there a name for that?  

Any suggestions?

Lesbro (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lesbro), if you don't mind the usage of "bro."

Sounds like a toy company...

"Look, mommy, this robot transforms into a vibrator!" 

New, from Lesbro!  Collect 'em all! 

I think I stumbled upon something - where the patent orifice office?
Eww. 
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Near Lurker on 08 Apr 2010, 07:50
...that is just so many kinds of wrong...

The phrase I've heard has been "dyke tyke"; of course, that's not something I would say without the Internet's comforting anonymity and non-punchability.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 08 Apr 2010, 07:52
Pass that idea on to David Willis - he can definitely work it.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: LeeC on 08 Apr 2010, 08:20
if I was marten I would only do this for Dora if Dora and Faye did it first right then and there.  Knowing Faye wouldnt go through with it and Dora making out with her brother's sorta-ex would probably turn her off as well. :roll:
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 08 Apr 2010, 08:32
OK, been thinkin' (is it getting warm in here?)  

Faye's "Douuuuuche" was kind of uncalled for.  "Horndoooogg", maybe.  

As for Steve's apparent ability to divorce sex from emotional involvement, bravo.  Most people aren't really able to do that - there's wiring nvolved, both social and, some would argue, evolutionary.  A lot of people who think they can seperate the two are actually fooling themselves, and it leads to problems later.  

And that's the S*P tie in, too.  I remembered that arc, but a little refresher wasn't a bad thing.  The girl he turned down was pulling a Marigold - she'd been acting in a play Davan was directing, had been crushing on him, then tracked him to his home and aproached him.  It wasn't "just for fun", there was some serious emotional involvement there.  And Davan, havng come off a long term committed relationship, and knowing he wasn't over it, would have wound up hurting this girl.  So he did the right thing, as he so often does*.  

Aubrey of course mocked him for it.  That's just who she is.  And that's what was quoted.  

"The more you know!"  

*Davan is actually a lot more self-aware than most people.  That's why he's frequently depressed, pessimistic and generally misanthropic.  Makes for great reading, if you haven't.  
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Near Lurker on 08 Apr 2010, 08:39
On another note: Marten, how did you not see this coming?  Have you even met Dora before?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 08 Apr 2010, 10:59
OK, been thinkin' (is it getting warm in here?)  

Faye's "Douuuuuche" was kind of uncalled for.  "Horndoooogg", maybe.  
I'll buy that, mainly because Steve, so far as I know, doesn't know Marigold. It's one thing to 'take what is offered' when you think it's casual, and another when you're fair certain the other person is going into this wanting more, and still another when you know she hasn't the experience to realize simply offering you her body isn't the way to get it*. (Remember, Marigold didn't say, "I wanna get laid" —she said, "I think we can be more.") If Steve did the one-night thing with a girl he absolutely knew was expecting him to be the love of her life afterward without correcting her first, then, then we say "Douuuuuche." 'Cause that's taking advantage and hurting, all to get your rocks off, which isn't, for non-douches, anyway, the primary concern.

And Tomart, Sven damned well did know he'd screwed up—why else was he prepared for the lies next day? He knew Faye was going to be hurt, that's why. Anyone who goes into their relationships like a fucking lawyer** (Hey, it's what she said we were, and I argue that this means…) is almost guaranteed to stomp on hearts. There's feelings involved, and many, many people are atrocious about talking about them, Faye not the least. Of course, that's great for anyone who doesn't give a shit about the other person (see douche). But if you care about the person, even if you're as clueless as Angus can be, you have to think about what's not being said, but that you know exists within the person. That's called being a friend, and I hope, anyway, that friendship comes before fucking. Faye was right: Angus is a good man. Sven, not so much, although he may be trying now.

Better stop there—outta breath. Damn the pollen.

*Or he. And, like it or not, Western cultural convention makes this appear to be a viable transaction, depicting it endlessly in TV, novels, religion, what have you. Don't like it? Suck it up—it's how it is at the moment. You can detest it, want to change it, try to change it, but you can't say it doesn't exist, or refuse to deal with it when a naive person tries to make the exchange. Want to change the world? Start with caring about the person next to you. And yes, Carl, I sometimes think it would make the world better if we could divorce sex from automatic emotional involvement. But we ain't there yet, probably because we need more emotional involvement that's not dependent on sex.

**Literally, I suppose
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: lhasafi on 08 Apr 2010, 11:56
Poor Marten. They guy just can't catch a break. It seems everytime someone gets screwed (in the figurative sense of the word, thankyouverymuch) it's Marten. What has the guy done to deserve this?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Moxie on 08 Apr 2010, 12:01
What has Marten done? Been the main character of a comic.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 08 Apr 2010, 12:03
And is a master of "Open mouth, insert foot"-jutsu.

Besides the author has to pick someone to be the butt of the jokes
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: blindeye on 08 Apr 2010, 12:14
I desire "EMERGENCY BOOZE" stickers.

If you print them, I will buy.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: wargrafix on 08 Apr 2010, 12:53
Faye is the automated twat. I need those stickers too.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 08 Apr 2010, 13:00
Dora's reaction was easy enough to predict, but I was surprised to see that Faye seems to be developing a liking for guy-on-guy action as well. I almost expected her to bail for the storage room or get the spray bottle for Dora. Nice to see that she's starting to loosen up a little more.
Faye has considered watching guys make out (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=404).
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 08 Apr 2010, 15:09
<snip>

And yes, Carl, I sometimes think it would make the world better if we could divorce sex from automatic emotional involvement. But we ain't there yet, probably because we need more emotional involvement that's not dependent on sex.


Yes, we do indeed need more emotional involvement that doesn't depend on sex.  But I really don't think we'll ever be able to divorce sex from emotional involvement.  Sex is too deeply involved with the pleasure centers of the brain, and they - both chemically and neurally - are inexorably tied to the emotional centers of the brain. 

Not that people haven't tried to sever those ties.  Some people can rationalize it away, but they're fooling themselves, and usually pay some kind of price for it at some point (no, not karma or god's wrath - usually "just" psychological problems later in life). 

That's not to say that a good roll in the hay can't just be for fun, but you'll always remember it fondly...  I know I do! 
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Akima on 08 Apr 2010, 18:53
Faye's "Douuuuuche" was kind of uncalled for.  "Horndoooogg", maybe.
Well... Steve is a bit of a douche, quite frankly (IMHO at least, your mileage may vary, but he's even got the hair (http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/thirdimpact/DoucheBagmotivator.jpg).), with a long record of brief, serial relationships, sometimes thrown over for self-admittedly shallow reasons (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=94). To be fair though, Steve does at least seem to be a serial monogamist. But random drunken screwing, especially of sexually inexperienced people, is generally a very bad idea. Is Marigold baby-proofed for example? Though Steve probably carries Emergency Condoms at least. I suppose it depends how harsh an insult you consider "douche" to be.

Nice to see Steve again though; stubble, sidies, and all.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 08 Apr 2010, 20:32
...but he's even got the hair (http://media.ebaumsworld.com/picture/thirdimpact/DoucheBagmotivator.jpg).

GAAAH!!!

Looks like my graduating class.  Only more hair gel. 
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: quats on 08 Apr 2010, 21:41
Well, it's common knowledge that a lot of men get turned on by lesbian sex.  But to be honest, I don't know of many (alright, any) women who'd be turned on by gay male sex...

Of course, most of the women I know are lesbians.  Their consensus is that male bodies are icky, so not fun to watch.  

I know a LOT of straight and bi women who are REALLY turned on by the thought/sight of 2 men together. Me included. Possibly why I only ever dated bi men...


I think it's the same basic principle: two people who "should" be attracted to you.... and then you can so easily picture yourself in the middle. 

I suspect the biggest reason some find the idea gross is the cultural indoctrination against male homosexuality; take out that factor and you'd have just as many women drooling over male/male couplings as men do female on female.  The thought of men grinding on each other to attract women in bars, the way a lot of women fake it to attract men, amuses me.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Near Lurker on 08 Apr 2010, 21:57
It's not entirely alien to me... although perhaps not in bars.  I suspect I'm just ahead of the generation where it will become commonplace... then again, it wasn't that uncommon when I was that (under) age.  Maybe it's just not the bar crowd's thing.

There already is the stereotype of the straight man who goes to/"ruins" gay bars because of the women who go to see gay men make out.  And, of course, a host of emo/goth stereotypes.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: 0kamisama on 08 Apr 2010, 22:02
Dora's reaction was easy enough to predict, but I was surprised to see that Faye seems to be developing a liking for guy-on-guy action as well. I almost expected her to bail for the storage room or get the spray bottle for Dora. Nice to see that she's starting to loosen up a little more.
Faye has considered watching guys make out (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=404).
Thank you, QC archivist! I guess I was mostly picturing this side of Faye (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1380) in relation to the most recent comic.


Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: zagraf on 09 Apr 2010, 03:03
Chili and pop rocks in a...Not a blackboard-"menu" joke but something a customer wants to...Whatwhatwhat *HEAD-EXPLOSION*

...If I were in Marten's shoes, I'd be grateful my GF didn't tell me about the secret menu, if that's typical of the stuff on it. I'd consider her not tellling me a sign of her love.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Schmorgluck on 09 Apr 2010, 03:04
Muhahaha! Never assume someone knows a secret if you haven't told them yourself, Dora.

EDIT: as for chili and pop rocks in a mocha... well, I don't know how pop rocks would do, but I almost always put chili in my mocha, and it's awesome.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: LTK on 09 Apr 2010, 03:06
DAAAAAAALE
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: akronnick on 09 Apr 2010, 03:14
Was Marten a regular CoD customer before he met Faye? MAybe he had been there a few times, (long enough for Sara to be crushing on him) but not long enough for Faye and Him to know each other when they met at the bar. Also, Dora didn't know him until Faye introduced him.

That leads me to beleive that the CoD staff don't think of him as a customer, but more like a friend, ergo, not someone who would

This of course leads to two very important questions:

First, does Dale sing and/or play guitar good enough to warrant an audition with Deathmole?

And second, does Angus know about the secret menu?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Strike Reyhi on 09 Apr 2010, 03:17
Marten is not getting a break it seems. :evil:
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: lhasafi on 09 Apr 2010, 03:23
Marten is not getting a break it seems. :evil:
No. He most definitely is not. I mean, come on, the guy's basically been living at CoD for Ceilingcat knows how long, lives with two of their employees - and is still oblivious of the secret menu? What next?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Tuitsuro on 09 Apr 2010, 03:24
Secret Menus tend to suck.  Case in point:  McDonald's Land, Sea and Air burger consisting of a beef, fish, and chicken patty on a bun...
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: jeanramone on 09 Apr 2010, 03:30
Foreshadowing of Dora/Marten problems or a way to introduce Dale? Time will tell I guess.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: 0kamisama on 09 Apr 2010, 03:32
Secret Menus tend to suck.  Case in point:  McDonald's Land, Sea and Air burger consisting of a beef, fish, and chicken patty on a bun...
Not always. Take In-N-Out Burger's secret menu, for example.

Oh, Jeph and your wacky weekend cliffhangers... Anywho, I'm guessing after about 3 or 4 days (our time) of arguing, things will be back to 'fantastic make-up sex' normal for Dora and Marten again.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Tuitsuro on 09 Apr 2010, 03:42
Not always. Take In-N-Out Burger's secret menu, for example.

Yeah, I was just watching a video of a guy's escapades into trying to order a 1024x1024 burger...
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 09 Apr 2010, 03:52
Ah secrets - trouble for the relationship.  Even if they have nothing to do with the relationship.

Drama for next week, maybe, possibly, if his nibs so decides.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Akima on 09 Apr 2010, 04:13
First chimichangas (http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,24625.msg925196.html#msg925196) and now Pop-Rocks. If it weren't for Google I wouldn't know what the hell you guys were talking about!

Secret Menus tend to suck.
Not so! Many Chinese restaurants have a secret me- choke, gurk, gurgle... <loss of signal>
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 09 Apr 2010, 04:14
Quote
Marten's look in the last panel of 1639 is because:

he was actually joking.    - 4 (5.8%)
Steve actually liked giving tongue.    - 11 (15.9%)
It's not the first time he's been asked to do this.    - 32 (46.4%)
His dad did this to him once.    - 1 (1.4%)
He hasn't brushed his teeth yet.    - 2 (2.9%)
No pancakes are involved.    - 7 (10.1%)
He suddenly realized he's in a webcomic.    - 12 (17.4%)

Total Voters: 69
And we HAVE to come up with the items on the secret menu...
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Dliessmgg on 09 Apr 2010, 04:28
#34: Fetish Latte

On a related note: In German, "Latte" is sometimes used as penis.

Edit: #23: Conspiracy Coffee
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: MegaLexi on 09 Apr 2010, 04:31
Chili and pop rocks in a...Not a blackboard-"menu" joke but something a customer wants to...Whatwhatwhat *HEAD-EXPLOSION*

...If I were in Marten's shoes, I'd be grateful my GF didn't tell me about the secret menu, if that's typical of the stuff on it. I'd consider her not tellling me a sign of her love.

I've heard worse. Went to Sonic tonight for dinner, and was talking with the cashier. He had a lady order a slush with BBQ sauce and ranch in it. And she drank it, right there in the store.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: snubnose on 09 Apr 2010, 04:43
Hmm.

This black guy looks like a white guy who painted his skin brown and wears an afro wig.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: snubnose on 09 Apr 2010, 04:47
On a related note: In German, "Latte" is sometimes used as penis.
Err, not surprisingly, considering that its mainly a word for "stick" or "timber".

Also, theres a ton of nonstandard words for penis, errection, vagina etc around.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Random832 on 09 Apr 2010, 05:16
Secret Menus tend to suck.  Case in point:  McDonald's Land, Sea and Air burger consisting of a beef, fish, and chicken patty on a bun...

I don't believe that this is a 'secret menu item' with any official status.

Half of the things on the so-called 'secret menu items' lists are either discontinued or seasonal items (but which have actually been on the menu), straightforward combinations of things that no-one would have any trouble ordering ("fries with big mac sauce" is not a secret menu item), or stuff someone made up and gave a name to.

As for the "Land, Sea, and Air burger" - evidence points to the third. http://www.eatmedaily.com/2009/09/the-land-sea-and-air-burger-on-playboys-eat-me-video/ - no more a "secret menu item" than the "McGangBang"

http://www.asylum.com/2010/03/31/secret-menu-items-mcdonalds-chilis-burger-king-kfc/?icid=main
# Big Mac with Quarter Pounder Patties - This is great if you are looking to decrease the cost and calories of the classic Big Mac Sandwich. You get the entire flavor with less meat.

There were other problem items, but this one was the most ridiculous example of 'did not do the research' - whoever wrote this description has either never eaten a big mac or has never eaten either a quarter pounder or the described item.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: J on 09 Apr 2010, 05:37
so, wait, they actually have customers that they like?

when did this happen?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Near Lurker on 09 Apr 2010, 05:42
And Starbucks' secret menu is just 6 oz versions of all their hot drinks!
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: akronnick on 09 Apr 2010, 05:52
so, wait, they actually have customers that they like?

when did this happen?

Well there's Dale, and...

Dale. He may be the only one.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 09 Apr 2010, 05:55
If I REALLY wanted, I could probably go back and look at all the specials and assign "numbers" to them.

But even I do not get THAT bored.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 09 Apr 2010, 06:00
You need something that uses the emergency bourbon. 

A southern Irish coffee? 
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Border Reiver on 09 Apr 2010, 07:23
Why would you want to mix perfectly good coffee with the worst of the whiskies?  Do you hate yourself that much? 
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: sudamerican on 09 Apr 2010, 07:43
Quote
You get the entire flavor with less meat.
That's what she said
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: NeverQuiteGoth on 09 Apr 2010, 07:44
Um...

Who the fuck is Dale?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Mr_Rose on 09 Apr 2010, 07:47
A completely new character designed specifically to mess with the heads, ventricular adjuncts, and various other thinking organs of the forumites who appear to have encyclopaedic knowledge of the strip archive.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 09 Apr 2010, 08:23
Dale was introduced in one of the secret strips that only insiders know about.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Steve the Pocket on 09 Apr 2010, 08:24
Chili and pop rocks in a...Not a blackboard-"menu" joke but something a customer wants to...Whatwhatwhat *HEAD-EXPLOSION*
Yeah. That surprised me a lot more than the revelation that they have a secret menu and never told Marten about it. And notice how Dora said it with a totally straight face, too. Maybe this comic actually takes place in a Bizarro World where that ridiculous stuff is somehow normal.

THIS. CHANGES. EVERYTHING.

Dale was introduced in one of the secret strips that only insiders know about.

Win. :-D
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Schmorgluck on 09 Apr 2010, 08:47
Yeah. That surprised me a lot more than the revelation that they have a secret menu and never told Marten about it.
I think Dora and Faye each assumed that the other told him.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: EvolPenguin on 09 Apr 2010, 09:07
Does anyone else think that the #28 sounds delicious? I'd try it for sure...
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Mr_Rose on 09 Apr 2010, 09:36
Dale was introduced in one of the secret strips that only insiders know about.
Dammit! You told the peons! Now they have to Disappear; you know what Jeph said about Having Nice Things...


Maybe this comic actually takes place in a Bizarro World where that ridiculous stuff is somehow normal.

THIS. CHANGES. EVERYTHING.
I'm sorry, did you say "tiny sentient robots running around causing havoc"?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Kazukagii on 09 Apr 2010, 10:21
Damn, I know we're supposed to feel sorry for Marigold these days, but I can't help but feel sympathy for Marten. In the last 3 strips he's been in only bad things have come his way.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: westrim on 09 Apr 2010, 10:49
Well there's a healthy dose of fridge logic (#5 on the list, ice, beer, and coffee) for ya! How many customers has he watched her serve? How many times has he seen the shelves and not wondered "why do they have pop rocks?" Wait, so No one has ever ordered the daily specials, not all of which sounded so bad, but they have a secret menu? And- stopping now.

And In-n-Out's  secret menu is awesome, you secret menu haters! *shakes fist* Nothing like animal fries to give you that cholesterol.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Heliphyneau on 09 Apr 2010, 10:54
Bahaha, awesome!  I like Dale too, so the title must be true.  ^_^  Doubt I'd order a #28, though -- the chili is fine (as long as we're talking spice rather than gloppy with meat and beans chili), but the Pop Rocks would make the mocha splash/bubble/spit in my face, soooo . . . kinda messy.  #666 for me please!

Marten is definitely having some sitcom-esque wah-waaaaah moments lately, but it looks like he may have evaded the Steve liplock that Dora and Faye had been encouraging.  Pity though, since a pic of that might have helped cheer Marigold up . . .

And I doubt Angus knows about the secret menu, since Faye used to greet him with "Oh no, not you again."
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 09 Apr 2010, 12:25
I am extremely disapointed that the CoD staff actually likes anyone enough to create a secret menu for them.

Everything is ruined forever!  Everything is ruined forever! Everything is ruined forever!  Everything is ruined forever!                                 (Wait for me, dammit!) Everything is ruined forever!



Edit:
No. He most definitely is not. I mean, come on, the guy's basically been living at CoD for Ceilingcat knows how long, lives with two of their employees - and is still oblivious of the secret menu? What next?
ALL PRAIZE 2 CEILIN CAT!
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: The Duke on 09 Apr 2010, 12:52
Please, please let Dale become a main character.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: connathan on 09 Apr 2010, 13:56
Please, please let Dale become a main character.

This.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Dliessmgg on 09 Apr 2010, 14:11
(http://www.questionablecontent.net/random/winfail.png)
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: EvolPenguin on 09 Apr 2010, 15:24
Dliessmgg: You just dropped a deuce of wisdom all over connathan.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Dliessmgg on 09 Apr 2010, 15:37
Well, shit happens.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Kugai on 09 Apr 2010, 15:40
Dale was introduced in one of the secret strips that only insiders know about.
Dammit! You told the peons! Now they have to Disappear; you know what Jeph said about Having Nice Things...

What - The same thing Zathras said?     :-D


Dale is Steve's long lost twin brother.


I think Dora and Faye are gonna have a bit of 'splanin' to do.





#42 - Ol' Janx spirit with Lemon and a large chocolate rock in a Latte
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Near Lurker on 09 Apr 2010, 16:32
"...tell you what, I forgive you as long as you don't make me make out with Steve."
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: JackFaerie on 09 Apr 2010, 17:08
STOP giving me such mental images AAAAAH THE PAIN !!!!  :x :x :x :x

Dude. Really? You're that homophobic/uptight? If the simple idea of a girl ASKING you to make out with another dude (you don't have to do it, y'know), or a verbal description of two guys kissing sends you into that kind of panic... you got issues.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 09 Apr 2010, 17:28
Chili and pop rocks in a...Not a blackboard-"menu" joke but something a customer wants to...Whatwhatwhat *HEAD-EXPLOSION*
Yeah. That surprised me a lot more than the revelation that they have a secret menu and never told Marten about it. And notice how Dora said it with a totally straight face, too. Maybe this comic actually takes place in a Bizarro World where that ridiculous stuff is somehow normal.

THIS. CHANGES. EVERYTHING.

Dale was introduced in one of the secret strips that only insiders know about.

Win. :-D
Strip 28, of course. ;)

EDIT: And I added an additional option to the poll... DON'T PANIC! ;)
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Kugai on 09 Apr 2010, 19:42
 :laugh:

I call it the Pan Galactic Latte Blaster
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: MegaLexi on 09 Apr 2010, 21:22
Y'know, a #11 might be good. Light sprinkling of spice and a couple of shots of cherry, maybe add a shot of chocolate.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 09 Apr 2010, 21:48
Can't drink coffee.  Even decaf, I have an amino acid imbalance that responds to an amino acid in coffee.  Sucks all the iron out of my system - two cups of coffee, and I go unconscious. 

So that's why I voted for "sonmething not listed".  I drink lots of tea - black, usually, none of this green shit, I'm in it for the caffeine, and some good flavor helps.  Can I order some chai, or something? 
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 09 Apr 2010, 21:53
Why would you want to mix perfectly good coffee with the worst of the whiskies?  Do you hate yourself that much? 

It's not for me...

And who says the emergency stuff is the worst? 
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Exar_Kun on 09 Apr 2010, 23:15
I love how this thread is more shocked that there is some aspect of the QC universe we aren't aware of, than that there is more Dora/Marten drama.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: akronnick on 09 Apr 2010, 23:21
Dora/Marten drama is an absolute, like the law of gravity or the firmness of the Earth.

But whole characters that appear fully formed out of nowhere, already known to both Dora and Faye, that's Big News!
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Tago Mago on 10 Apr 2010, 00:01
QC has a token black guy! Who says "daaaang" and "shit"! Awesome.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Sir Tacopuss on 10 Apr 2010, 00:13
THAT is WACK!
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: michi-love on 10 Apr 2010, 05:05
Dale was introduced in one of the secret strips that only insiders know about.

That is truly an awesome revelation. Someone needs to upload these secret strips for those of us less in-the-know.

Also, I enjoy the idea of turning Dale into the new band member. He looks as if he would get along with our motley crew.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 10 Apr 2010, 05:38
Dale was introduced in one of the secret strips that only insiders know about.

That is truly an awesome revelation. Someone needs to upload these secret strips for those of us less in-the-know.



These would be the fan photoshops and punchline mashups that we get on here every so often... and some of them are set in the Gay Steve And Martin universe.   
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: snubnose on 10 Apr 2010, 09:41
Damn, I know we're supposed to feel sorry for Marigold these days, but I can't help but feel sympathy for Marten. In the last 3 strips he's been in only bad things have come his way.
Nah, Dora will make it up to him anyway in the end.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: snubnose on 10 Apr 2010, 09:44
STOP giving me such mental images AAAAAH THE PAIN !!!!  :x :x :x :x
Dude. Really? You're that homophobic/uptight? If the simple idea of a girl ASKING you to make out with another dude (you don't have to do it, y'know), or a verbal description of two guys kissing sends you into that kind of panic... you got issues.
Meh, I dont care what homosexuals do, as long as they do it among themselves. But I also dont want to get it described to me. If you consider THAT homophobic - then I really cant help you.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Dliessmgg on 10 Apr 2010, 12:50
Your reaction was a bit too over the top to be not homophobic.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Shadic on 10 Apr 2010, 13:21
People KISS!? WAH!
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: JackFaerie on 10 Apr 2010, 19:38
STOP giving me such mental images AAAAAH THE PAIN !!!!  :x :x :x :x
Dude. Really? You're that homophobic/uptight? If the simple idea of a girl ASKING you to make out with another dude (you don't have to do it, y'know), or a verbal description of two guys kissing sends you into that kind of panic... you got issues.
Meh, I dont care what homosexuals do, as long as they do it among themselves. But I also dont want to get it described to me. If you consider THAT homophobic - then I really cant help you.


Well you're the one who needs help if you can't stomach two people kissing being described to you. I mean, that certainly sounds like a phobia to me.  The reaction of most well adjusted people to something like that is calm indifference, not panicky disgust.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: QuarterFire on 10 Apr 2010, 20:12
Needs more Dale.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: akronnick on 11 Apr 2010, 00:54
Indeed.

Wait, are we allowed to say indeed as a complete sentence? Is it too much like 'Win.' or 'Fail.' or 'This.'?

Are all one-word sentencese taboo now?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 11 Apr 2010, 00:56
Yes
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: akronnick on 11 Apr 2010, 01:06
You know what's worse than using one-word sentences?






Well lot's of stuff actually.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 11 Apr 2010, 01:37
Using them ironically?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: akronnick on 11 Apr 2010, 04:32
Yeah there's that, but I was thinking of using one-word sentences without punctuation.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 11 Apr 2010, 09:49
Naturally
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: connathan on 11 Apr 2010, 13:08
Wow, you're so wise, you corrected my one word statement by posting a drawing! I suppose a picture tells a thousand words...

I was simply echoing the previous person's statement, sorry I didn't use a whole sentence to do so.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: jwhouk on 11 Apr 2010, 15:57
Wow, you're so wise, you corrected my one word statement by posting a drawing! I suppose a picture tells a thousand words...

I was simply echoing the previous person's statement, sorry I didn't use a whole sentence to do so.
tl; dr
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 11 Apr 2010, 18:21
Don't you love watching the untrained attempt sarcasm? 

It's soooo cuuuuuuuuute!!
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 11 Apr 2010, 18:31
Lots of positive responses to Dale, after very brief exposure to him.

Please say more about the nature of the appeal and where it comes from.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 11 Apr 2010, 18:34
I smell a poll topic...
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Sorflakne on 11 Apr 2010, 21:35
People KISS!? WAH!
Sometimes...WITH THEIR TONGUES!!!!!11!11one
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: raoullefere on 12 Apr 2010, 00:41
Please say more about the nature of the appeal and where it comes from.
Didn't get it, myself. But then, I'm still pissed the staff actually like a few customers. It's unnatural, I tell ya! No good will come of it. You'll all rue the day. And so on, and so on…
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: snubnose on 12 Apr 2010, 01:45
Meh. Staff is only human. Of some sort. Nobody is perfect ! So what ?
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Jace on 13 Apr 2010, 21:44
(http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/5170/hmmmbaby.jpg)
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: bicostp on 14 Apr 2010, 22:10
I'd take a #37 because I'm not even supposed to be here today.
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Sir Tacopuss on 15 Apr 2010, 18:09
(http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/5170/hmmmbaby.jpg)

(http://www.all4humor.com/images/files/Baby%20face.jpg)
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: Carl-E on 15 Apr 2010, 18:40
Oooh, can I have one? 
Title: Re: WCT April 5-9, 2010
Post by: scarred on 15 Apr 2010, 19:00
where did you find that picture of me from high school