THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: BenRG on 08 Nov 2015, 06:12

Title: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 08 Nov 2015, 06:12
So, how will Bubbles handle having to deal with Faye still working with her at the fighting arena?

Personally, I'm thinking my option 5 in the poll above. Bubbles will start the day by saying that she hopes Faye has learned her lesson about how she wants to be left alone. She'll then spend the day (or as long as it takes) staying in close proximity to Faye and doing everything she possibly can to provoke her into interacting with her because. damn it, she wants this but can't admit it to herself, let alone say it out loud!

That aside, I am saying that strip 3085 occurred the evening after the party and that Faye works a night shift now. Because of this, she sees a lot less of Marten and everyone in her circle than she did before. Agree, disagree or discuss?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 08 Nov 2015, 06:28
Bubbles wants to be more social. Bubbles also does not want to be more social. She is aware of the contradiction. She is mad at Faye for trying to force the issue, and also mad at herself for being irrationally mad at Faye, and also mad at herself for being so screwed up, and on top of that she's mad at the people who got her into the circumstances that broke her so badly. She's emotionally overloading, and she's not equipped to handle it. In her current state, any reaction is possible.

Unless you've been in a similar state, you can't imagine what it's like.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Reaver on 08 Nov 2015, 11:00
I still think it's in Faye's best interest to leave well enough alone, don't poke the sleeping bear, and don't aggravate her further,  the person with severe issues should not be trying to teach the AI with severe issues about what they should do
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 08 Nov 2015, 11:23
Whatever it is, I would be surprised if one of the Poll Options isn't it.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 08 Nov 2015, 14:38
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 08 Nov 2015, 18:15
For what it's worth, I felt obligated to vote that she install herself in a Firefly-class transport. I don't think it likely, but I had to vote that way.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 08 Nov 2015, 18:17
Hey wow, they're being adults about it! I'm glad, though it makes it harder for Jeph to keep it funny if the characters do reasonable things.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: TheCollector on 08 Nov 2015, 19:01
Hehe, Bubbles blush. Me thinks she does have a thing for Faye. Going to a party she didn't want to. Punching the bag till it burst while calling herself stupid over and over. Fixing up her hair while lying that she woke up like that. All signs point to one thing. lol
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 08 Nov 2015, 19:21
I understand why anime-themed robot bodies are equipped for it, but why would a combat chassis be set up with the ability to blush?

It's almost as though it were a joke and I'm over-analyzing it :-)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Thrudd on 08 Nov 2015, 19:34
Not so much blush per se but have the full facial response repertoire to enable non-verbal communication with their human squad mates or other humans who they may have to interact with.
You really don't want an uncanny valley AI out there creeping out the GI or terrifying the local populace.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Magniras on 08 Nov 2015, 19:35
I understand why anime-themed robot bodies are equipped for it, but why would a combat chassis be set up with the ability to blush?

It's almost as though it were a joke and I'm over-analyzing it :-)

Lets take that over-analyzing and run with it!

It could be for a number of reasons, but the one I would be willing to put money on is anthropomorphization.  Bubbles is a very large, scary looking combat droid who in the past would have had to rely on and be trusted by her fellow squad mates.  If she can't be approached on a human level, the squad she is assigned to would most likely only see her as a tool to be used, and this would make a full AI very sad.

Conversely, if she displays human traits, like losing control of her emotions, this makes her relatable and approachable, which is very good for team building.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Thrudd on 08 Nov 2015, 19:43
I just noticed that as Bubbles  was bending that bar that not only did she kink it she crushed it in her hands.
This is a confirmation of her being nervous about the conversation and its possible outcome.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 08 Nov 2015, 19:48
I just saw the sketch in the description and it made me so very happy
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: electromgneticDstroyosaur on 08 Nov 2015, 19:57
I understand why anime-themed robot bodies are equipped for it, but why would a combat chassis be set up with the ability to blush?

It's almost as though it were a joke and I'm over-analyzing it :-)

Lets take that over-analyzing and run with it!

It could be for a number of reasons, but the one I would be willing to put money on is anthropomorphization.  Bubbles is a very large, scary looking combat droid who in the past would have had to rely on and be trusted by her fellow squad mates.  If she can't be approached on a human level, the squad she is assigned to would most likely only see her as a tool to be used, and this would make a full AI very sad.

Conversely, if she displays human traits, like losing control of her emotions, this makes her relatable and approachable, which is very good for team building.

Losing control of one's emotions can also result in violent outbursts, which are decidedly bad for team building.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 08 Nov 2015, 20:09
I understand why anime-themed robot bodies are equipped for it, but why would a combat chassis be set up with the ability to blush?

It's almost as though it were a joke and I'm over-analyzing it :-)

Lets take that over-analyzing and run with it!

It could be for a number of reasons, but the one I would be willing to put money on is anthropomorphization.  Bubbles is a very large, scary looking combat droid who in the past would have had to rely on and be trusted by her fellow squad mates.  If she can't be approached on a human level, the squad she is assigned to would most likely only see her as a tool to be used, and this would make a full AI very sad.

Conversely, if she displays human traits, like losing control of her emotions, this makes her relatable and approachable, which is very good for team building.

Losing control of one's emotions can also result in violent outbursts, which are decidedly bad for team building.

And yet, today's comic, wherein Faye and Bubbles, post-violent outburst, appear to have gotten closer. I think it comes down to having control enough not to murder a person, knowing when to apologize, and them having the ability to forgive.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Tova on 08 Nov 2015, 20:12
I understand why anime-themed robot bodies are equipped for it, but why would a combat chassis be set up with the ability to blush?

She's an AI, and her emotions will be there whether the designers wanted them there or not.

Presumably, the advantages of implementing hardware supporting their visibility outweigh the disadvantages.

Losing control of one's emotions can also result in violent outbursts, which are decidedly bad for team building.

That sounds like a good enough reason to build hardware that allows those emotions to be visible. It would be dangerous for them not to be.
Having said that, I think that electromgneticDstroyosaur meant to refer to "losing control of the ability to hide the emotions" rather than losing control over the emotions themselves, going from the context.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 08 Nov 2015, 22:27
Nice to see them being totally adult about it.  I was a bit worried how it would go between these two after things went pear shaped at the party, but I think there's going to be a few more half crumbled walls between Faye and Bubbles before we get to her backstory


And her hair does look cute like that.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Detachable Felix on 08 Nov 2015, 22:37
For what it's worth, I felt obligated to vote that she install herself in a Firefly-class transport. I don't think it likely, but I had to vote that way.

"She's not in the ship, she is the gorram ship!"
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 08 Nov 2015, 23:37
Well, as others said, it's good to see that Jeph actually believes that his characters can act like sensible adults! I agree that it's sort of cute how Bubbles was so nervous about the conversation that she had to crumple a metal bar like that to handle her tension.

The hair and blush are nice little touches. Regarding the hair, maybe she's made a conscious decision to try to look less... intimidating as a sort of way of meeting the world half-way. As for the blush...? Well, it's obvious that her personality algorithm is human enough that she reacts to compliments. Besides... she wouldn't be the first person who, upon starting to peek out of their social shell, gets a crush on the first person to show them any kind of friendship. Whether there is anything else to it we'll just have to see.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: osaka on 09 Nov 2015, 01:11
Meanwhile, at some convenience store...

MAY: "NOW KISS"
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Case on 09 Nov 2015, 02:53
Hairdo spontaneously broke the SU_2(10) symmetry of the prevalent WZNW Lagrangian, rendering the topological Wess-Zumino term asymptotically massive, which lead to an overnight Kosterlitz-Thouless-type quantum phase transition into the Hipster-state at energy-scales close to the vacuum.

"I dunno, it was like this when I woke up ..."

(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/ff/c8/73/ffc873748c665cc79a2f496dec7f61d6.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 09 Nov 2015, 17:31
Lets take that over-analyzing and run with it!

It could be for a number of reasons, but the one I would be willing to put money on is anthropomorphization.  Bubbles is a very large, scary looking combat droid who in the past would have had to rely on and be trusted by her fellow squad mates.  If she can't be approached on a human level, the squad she is assigned to would most likely only see her as a tool to be used, and this would make a full AI very sad.

Conversely, if she displays human traits, like losing control of her emotions, this makes her relatable and approachable, which is very good for team building.

Partying with your team mates is good for building esprit de corps! Perhaps Bubbles feels guilty that she was not able to properly appreciate this... And so responded to Faye's challenge.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 09 Nov 2015, 19:02
The more I see it, the more the nose piercing bugs me.

It just makes her face look messy for some reason.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Lioness on 09 Nov 2015, 19:03
That teardrop in the last panel...poor Pintsize!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 09 Nov 2015, 19:12
That's not a teardrop...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Undrneath on 09 Nov 2015, 19:13
That teardrop in the last panel...poor Pintsize!

I don't think that's a teardrop, methinks that is the aforementioned bird poop.

Edit; darn you cesium.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 09 Nov 2015, 19:14
I always imagined the robot mouths didn't have depth.

Quote from: You're thinking
Then how did Pintsize eat cake mix?

I never said I thought it through!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 09 Nov 2015, 19:15
Well, this IS what would happen if his head were filled with birdseed...

Hurrah for consistancy.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Truec on 09 Nov 2015, 19:27
I always imagined the robot mouths didn't have depth.

Quote from: You're thinking
Then how did Pintsize eat cake mix?

I never said I thought it through!

It's actually been stated that his mouth connects to a holding tank in his stomach with a spectrometer that he uses to taste things.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 09 Nov 2015, 19:35
He's crying poop.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: DashaBlade on 09 Nov 2015, 20:04
Suddenly having the entire Library of Congress in Pintsize's head doesn't seem so bad.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 09 Nov 2015, 20:36
I'm disappointed that's a actual book and not just the cliffnotes for everything.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Lioness on 09 Nov 2015, 21:05
That's not a teardrop...

That teardrop in the last panel...poor Pintsize!

I don't think that's a teardrop, methinks that is the aforementioned bird poop.

Edit; darn you cesium.

Oh god.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 09 Nov 2015, 21:11
Don't you mean "Oh shit"?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: haikupoet on 09 Nov 2015, 21:52
#fabbles
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 09 Nov 2015, 23:35
I think that Jeph was inspired by that international commuter pigeon that he met at Newark airport.

That aside, we see that Claire isn't entirely immunised to the surreality of Marten's life just yet! Someone should tell her about the Roomba!

Just a P.S.: I'm actually wondering if Pintsize is just trolling Claire as an act of revenge. In any case, note that she is still at the apartment. Can moving in be far off?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 10 Nov 2015, 05:06
I understand why anime-themed robot bodies are equipped for it, but why would a combat chassis be set up with the ability to blush?

Adaptive camouflage, she can also blush in sand beige(desert), mottled green(forest), and shades of blue(sky/sea).

Now, why a combat chassis has brushable hair, that's what's got me confused.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 10 Nov 2015, 05:17
Now, why a combat chassis has brushable hair, that's what's got me confused.

I suspect that because of AI rights, the Department of Defence were never able to install military AIs in armour-plated bipedal killing machines that vaguely resemble Fallout-verse power armour. Instead, they gave them good-spec humanoid bodies that can wear armour far heavier, more constricting than any human could manage (that also lacked services like waste removal and ventilation). Consequently, Bubbles' chassis has a full selection of human non-verbal human interaction tools, most linked to respond automatically to her emotion algorithms. Additionally, she can customise some of her features when she wishes to do so for aesthetic or social needs.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 10 Nov 2015, 05:50
You know, I almost feel sorry for Pintsize.

Keyword there being almost.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 10 Nov 2015, 07:53
I understand why anime-themed robot bodies are equipped for it, but why would a combat chassis be set up with the ability to blush?

Adaptive camouflage, she can also blush in sand beige(desert), mottled green(forest), and shades of blue(sky/sea).

Now, why a combat chassis has brushable hair, that's what's got me confused.

That makes sense.

She may have been integrated with a squad of carbon-based soldiers. Likely, even, given that she was the only survivor. Carbon-based humans pay a lot of attention to hair whether they think about it or not. What's one of the first things done at boot camp? A haircut.

Configurable hair makes sense for the same reason giving her a face made sense.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: dexeron on 10 Nov 2015, 08:24
I do not understand what a City Face is, and the link does not help me.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 10 Nov 2015, 08:41
@dexeron,
This link (http://gunnerkrigg.wikia.com/wiki/City_Face_%28comic%29) may help more.

Not being a reader of GC, I'm not sure if the eponymous pigeon is really sapient or if the author is anthropomorphising him. However, the idea of an intelligent pigeon punishing Pintsize for his notorious acts does appeal to me on a certain level.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 10 Nov 2015, 09:51
Just to point out an in-joke in the comic, Claire is reading "A Brief History of Time" by Stephen Hawking. Hawking, bird, geddit? Also, Pintsize is "hocking" up the bird. Ha ha. (Won't blame the moderators if they ban me due to this comment.)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: emilygrrl on 10 Nov 2015, 11:12
Ok, if I had known what was coming today, I would not have read this comic while eating breakfast.  :facepalm:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 10 Nov 2015, 11:41
(Won't blame the moderators if they ban me due to this comment.)
I've probably done far worse.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Tova on 10 Nov 2015, 12:13
(Won't blame the moderators if they ban me due to this comment.)
I've probably done far worse.

I doubt this.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 10 Nov 2015, 12:23
If we banned people for punning, half the mod team would be gone, at least...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Detachable Felix on 10 Nov 2015, 12:56
Nah, like 90% of all puns on this forum are from Method.



[satanic voice]PUNS FOR THE PUN GOD[/satanic voice]
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 10 Nov 2015, 13:10
Nah, like 90% of all puns on this forum are from Method.



[satanic voice]PUNS FOR THE PUN GOD[/satanic voice]

I'd argue, there was a time I had every other post in the 'puns' thread, but I've been slacking. That thread has pretty fully unraveled since I got busy with school again, and now, I am shame.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 10 Nov 2015, 13:31
I AM THE PUN GOD.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 10 Nov 2015, 13:35
No, you're the pun dog.  :clairedoge:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: osaka on 10 Nov 2015, 13:39
Considering his choice of emoticons, I'd swear he was the pun parrot

:parrot:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 10 Nov 2015, 13:41
The Bird is the word
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Tova on 10 Nov 2015, 13:56
I AM THE PUN GOD.

Nah, your puns stink, really.
Not so much a pun god, more a pun gent.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 10 Nov 2015, 14:07
That's a bit punative
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: swapna on 10 Nov 2015, 15:42
Poor Pintsize, I actually feel sorry for him - I don't think he actually put something in the milk. Both Claire and Faye didn't have a hangover because they weren't drinking, and while they were up late, I think Claire is still used to early mornings and mom-made breakfast every morning. And Faye was chipper before she drank of the milk.

So he got his head stuffed full of birdseed and a City Face-shaped parasite for making a joke? Poor Pintsize :( Especially since his joke really wasn't meaner then Claire's.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: War Sparrow on 10 Nov 2015, 16:54
I understand why anime-themed robot bodies are equipped for it, but why would a combat chassis be set up with the ability to blush?

Adaptive camouflage, she can also blush in sand beige(desert), mottled green(forest), and shades of blue(sky/sea).

Now, why a combat chassis has brushable hair, that's what's got me confused.

Because sometimes even combat AI want to be pretty. Or she was expected to go to formal military events, and so her hair had to be up to spec, as it were. It helps with group bonding, especially if there were human women in the squad as well. "the giant AI is just like us, she has to fuss with her hair too!"
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 10 Nov 2015, 17:02
Another possibility: It's an add-on that she got after her military service was done. She replaced her helmet with hair.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 10 Nov 2015, 17:05
I thought that was helmet-hair.   :claireface:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 10 Nov 2015, 17:52
Well, like they say, you can take the helmet off of the girl, but you can't, uh, mumble mumble... yeah.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 10 Nov 2015, 18:42
It occurs to me that Pintsize could report this as a form of domestic abuse.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 10 Nov 2015, 19:37
WRT the new comic just up, this looks like May's first shirt that wasn't prison issue, borrowed, or with "May" sewn on it. Girl's finally invested in a wardrobe.

Speaking of robot wardrobes, do AI's need to do laundry as often as us meatsacks? They don't sweat or dribble other bodily fluids.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Carl-E on 10 Nov 2015, 20:00
So long as the joints don't leak lubricant, I'm sure it's fine. 

I really like the guy sneaking a glance at them in panel 4.  Makes it clear that it's not everyday you see two AI's strolling down the street in conversation.  they're still a bit of a novelty. 



Or maybe he just thinks May's hot.   :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 10 Nov 2015, 20:01
Poor Momo.  Such a sheltered life, even with who her owner is

Or that may be because of who her owner is.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Reaver on 10 Nov 2015, 20:55
Hehe, Bubbles blush. Me thinks she does have a thing for Faye. Going to a party she didn't want to. Punching the bag till it burst while calling herself stupid over and over. Fixing up her hair while lying that she woke up like that. All signs point to one thing. lol

To try and socialize,  mad at herself for not being able to socialize, trying to soften her appearance/ do something different with her appearance...

None of which screams "I have a thing for Faye, she gives me hard ladybot boners"
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 10 Nov 2015, 23:22
I'm actually quite annoyed at Momo this morning. She's demonstrating the worst aspects of 'I am the world' subjective morality. Just because her and the group of AIs with whom she associates has a pattern of behaviour that they consider 'appropriate', that does not mean she has the right to insist that everyone else follow it. Consider this, Momo: Has it occurred to you that Bubbles has patriotic feelings and decided that she wished to serve her fellow intelligent beings by protecting them as a soldier? Lots of humans come to that decision so why not an AI? Is not the definition of free will the ability to make choices about things like career and morality?

May, meanwhile, is taking a devilish delight in smashing Momo's idealistic fantasy of AIs having a higher morality and a focus on living in peace. No, Momo; I'm afraid that they are as flawed as the beings on whose minds they were modelled.

In fairness to Momo, I really think that she is more than a little naive and has been deliberately not thinking about military AIs and AIs who may find violence enjoyable. She's always been so afraid of humans and AIs ending up as adversaries that a challenge like that is just something that she's not let herself consider.

This could lead to an interesting interaction between Momo and Bubbles where we learn a lot more about Bubbles' past and Momo learns not to make snap judgements about people whom she does not know personally.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Tova on 10 Nov 2015, 23:33
...  and Momo learns not to make snap judgements about people whom she does not know personally.

Consider this, BenRG: I don't think she made a snap judgement about Bubbles. In fact, she immediately appears to be making an effort to try and understand Bubbles' actions, which Momo does not currently agree with.

I may criticise an action of someone else's - for example, the forum post I've quoted - but that's not the same thing as making a snap judgement about someone.

Consider this: Bubbles would probably even agree that, by her actions, she has decreased trust between humans and AIs (or whatever it was that Momo was about to say). There's a reason, as we know, that Bubbles is relectant to go amongst humans.

But, as May said, she must have her reasons. And Momo acknowledge this, wishing to know what they were!

In spite of her strong opinions, she is remaining fairly open minded, and therefore I don't think she deserves your annoyance.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 11 Nov 2015, 00:38
I just noticed that May is wearing like a digital version of Faye's classic shirt. Has it been in the strip previously?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: CM_albion on 11 Nov 2015, 02:24
Oh no. no no no.

Momo, do not turn this into a morality themed story arc where you storm in there and try and change things, or start shouting at faye for enabling it. no
i am not in the mood for a drama llama arc right now Jacques. don't do it, do not even think about doing it, do not even think about not doing it!
Global Moderator Comment It's rare, but Jeph does visit here sometimes, and criticism in the form of telling him what to do with his own comic is one of his least favorite things.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Kiloku on 11 Nov 2015, 04:34
I just noticed how similar their faces are, with the exception of the eyes. I think we can assume both chassis (how the hell do you pluralize that?) are made by the same manufacturer!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Tichy on 11 Nov 2015, 05:30
Today's might be the first comic that passes the AI-Bechdel test (two AIs, named, talking about something other than a human) - if you don't count the one mention of "humans". Just a random thought, what with Jeph drawing analogies between AI rights in the comic and other social issues in our world. (The weird thing with Pintsize two weeks ago notwithstanding.)

I just noticed how similar their faces are, with the exception of the eyes. I think we can assume both chassis (how the hell do you pluralize that?) are made by the same manufacturer!

Mmh, Idoru being a government contractor? Is there a monopoly on human-form chassis (how actually *do* you pluralize that?) in the QC world?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Somebody on 11 Nov 2015, 06:01
Today's might be the first comic that passes the AI-Bechdel test (two AIs, named, talking about something other than a human) - if you don't count the one mention of "humans". Just a random thought, what with Jeph drawing analogies between AI rights in the comic and other social issues in our world. (The weird thing with Pintsize two weeks ago notwithstanding.)
http://www.questionablecontent.net/855 & http://www.questionablecontent.net/1555 leap to mind.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: DSL on 11 Nov 2015, 06:41
Oh no. no no no.

Momo, do not turn this into a morality themed story arc where you storm in there and try and change things, or start shouting at faye for enabling it. no
i am not in the mood for a drama llama arc right now Jacques. don't do it, do not even think about doing it, do not even think about not doing it!

It could just as easily be a setup for commentary on those who must immediately rush in and Make Things Right, whether those being Righted want to be or not.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Roxtar on 11 Nov 2015, 07:01
Poor Momo.  Such a sheltered life, even with who her owner is

Or that may be because of who her owner is.

I was under the impression in the QCverse that the ai-human companion arrangement was voluntary with respect to both parties.

Momo is "owned" by Momo.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 11 Nov 2015, 07:38
Completely correct. It apparently wasn't always that way.

I think Momo is doing respectability politics. It's a powerful, useful, though frequently unsuccessful tactic for minority rights to provide an in-your-face disproof of all the harmful stereotypes. If so, she's not being fueled by moral indignation but by fear for her civil rights work.

Contrast her reaction to May with her reaction to Bubbles. She was ostentatiously contemptuous of May, a criminal, but only shocked by Bubbles with no personal condemnation involved. She didn't phrase her contempt for May in terms of law and order. It was more "That's not what we are like" or "May is not a true Scotsman".
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 11 Nov 2015, 07:40
I am loving the May/Momo friendship dynamic we have now. And May is right... Momo's look in the last panel is precious. Savor the shock and dismay, May...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: CM_albion on 11 Nov 2015, 09:52
Oh no. no no no.

Momo, do not turn this into a morality themed story arc where you storm in there and try and change things, or start shouting at faye for enabling it. no
i am not in the mood for a drama llama arc right now Jacques. don't do it, do not even think about doing it, do not even think about not doing it!

It could just as easily be a setup for commentary on those who must immediately rush in and Make Things Right, whether those being Righted want to be or not.

that's true. i would be ok with that.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Pilchard123 on 11 Nov 2015, 10:16
Today's might be the first comic that passes the AI-Bechdel test (two AIs, named, talking about something other than a human) - if you don't count the one mention of "humans". Just a random thought, what with Jeph drawing analogies between AI rights in the comic and other social issues in our world. (The weird thing with Pintsize two weeks ago notwithstanding.)

Two female AIs, even. Honest question - who reckons that means it passes the 'standard' (for want of a better word) version as well?

chassis (how actually *do* you pluralize that?)

Chassis.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 11 Nov 2015, 12:32
Today's might be the first comic that passes the AI-Bechdel test

The MECHdel test.  :claireface:

I apologize for nothing.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 11 Nov 2015, 12:45
Today's might be the first comic that passes the AI-Bechdel test (two AIs, named, talking about something other than a human) - if you don't count the one mention of "humans". Just a random thought, what with Jeph drawing analogies between AI rights in the comic and other social issues in our world. (The weird thing with Pintsize two weeks ago notwithstanding.)

Two female AIs, even. Honest question - who reckons that means it passes the 'standard' (for want of a better word) version as well?

It does, but that's no surprise. QC easily passes the Bechdel test most of the time. It would almost be hard not to given that the cast is mostly made up of women, and this isn't a 'harem anime' where everything comes back to the focus on one male character. Marten may be the most important male character, but there is no 'main character' really. Faye is just as important to the story, and the huge cast of secondary characters all play big roles. It's unuaual  to get a multi-month story arc based on Hanners, or Dora, or Claire etc...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 11 Nov 2015, 13:31
Ehhhhh, I'd argue that Marten is the McNulty (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_McNulty) of the show. It's very much an ensemble cast, but if we had to pick a main character, it'd be him.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Pilchard123 on 11 Nov 2015, 14:54
Today's might be the first comic that passes the AI-Bechdel test (two AIs, named, talking about something other than a human) - if you don't count the one mention of "humans". Just a random thought, what with Jeph drawing analogies between AI rights in the comic and other social issues in our world. (The weird thing with Pintsize two weeks ago notwithstanding.)

Two female AIs, even. Honest question - who reckons that means it passes the 'standard' (for want of a better word) version as well?

It does, but that's no surprise. QC easily passes the Bechdel test most of the time. It would almost be hard not to given that the cast is mostly made up of women, and this isn't a 'harem anime' where everything comes back to the focus on one male character. Marten may be the most important male character, but there is no 'main character' really. Faye is just as important to the story, and the huge cast of secondary characters all play big roles. It's unuaual  to get a multi-month story arc based on Hanners, or Dora, or Claire etc...

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 11 Nov 2015, 15:00
Equally spoiled response to the above spoiler:
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: katsmeat on 11 Nov 2015, 17:15
The purpose of the Bechdale test  is to make a real world point.  It (or the mechdaletest) doesn't seem to have any relevance in a world without a community of AIs
Passing or failing it when applied to AI's isn't really a thing.

Though I'd be willing to bet it'd be highly relevant in the QC universe, and that AIs would get a shitty deal at the hands of Hollywood. In amongst the movies about rampaging murder-bots, the best roles AI actors ( certainly there will be some)  could expect would be endlessly playing wacky sidekicks to chisel-jawed, straight , white male action heroes. 

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 11 Nov 2015, 17:42
"... She has gone against everything we are trying to build."
"What do you mean 'we', paleface?"
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 11 Nov 2015, 19:46
Just a random thought, what with Jeph drawing analogies between AI rights in the comic and other social issues in our world.

Trans people have over double the rate of participation in the military of the general population, despite still  being prohibited from serving at the present time.

This leads to some *interesting* debates within that community. I think it fair to say that the Right, in general, has less time for Trans people than the Left, and the Left has less time for the military than the Right.

I think Momo is doing respectability politics. It's a powerful, useful, though frequently unsuccessful tactic for minority rights to provide an in-your-face disproof of all the harmful stereotypes. If so, she's not being fueled by moral indignation but by fear for her civil rights work.
Much the same - but reversed - in the Trans community. If they can point to Trans women and men who have earned Silver Stars etc for courage, saving lives etc (as they can) it is in-your-face disproof of all the harmful stereotypes, so potentially useful to "the cause". The objection by many who lean to the Left is to the Military as a whole, even as a concept, on moral grounds. Which those who have been involved in the military can quite understand, it's a tragic necessity, not just the ultimate expression of maternal/paternal instinct.

I'm fascinated by the way Jeph is handling a similar, but mirror-image, issue.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: J on 11 Nov 2015, 19:52
the last thing bubs needs is a judgemental & self-richeous doogooder getting up in her face about how she's 'failing the cause'.

hopefully momo can at least be tactful. and if not, then hopefully she disassembles as easily as pintsize does.




The purpose of the Bechdale test  is to make a real world point.  It (or the mechdaletest) doesn't seem to have any relevance in a world without a community of AIs
Passing or failing it when applied to AI's isn't really a thing.

the thing about the bechdale test that people have a tendency to miss is that it's really only meaningful in aggregate, as a generalized 'average' for the roll of female characters in fiction. the question of whether or not any given individual work passes it is completely meaningless and irrelevant.

remember, Gravity & Pacific Rim both fail the test, but Twilight is bechdale approved.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 11 Nov 2015, 20:06
the last thing bubs needs is a judgemental & self-richeous doogooder getting up in her face about how she's 'failing the cause'.

I suspect that once Momo gets to talk with Bubbles, she'll be more concerned with her mental wellbeing than any cause. You can't be an effective Activist without jettisoning the "Big Picture" sometimes in favour of being merely human. Or AI in Momo's case.

If you don't have empathy, kindness - what's the point of Activism? It's that that keeps you going.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 11 Nov 2015, 20:53
This is unexpected.  I figured Momo was such a goody-goody that she wouldn't be able to resist the urge to report it.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Estron on 11 Nov 2015, 21:02
Then one wonders what other vocations and avocations some luckless sentients must do to get by -- oh yeah, "Sinfest" is a few webcomics up the list.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 11 Nov 2015, 21:32
It does say something about Momo that she acknowledges necessity and the existence of desperate people along with her quest for all AIs to be respectable.

Yes, I said "people". They're not homo sapiens and not made of proteins but so what?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Radium_Coyote on 11 Nov 2015, 21:43
I don't remember seeing anyone in this comic yet suggesting that AIs were not people.  And if they did I suspect the absurdity of that wouldn't play very long.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: J on 11 Nov 2015, 22:05
Yes, I said "people". They're not homo sapiens and not made of proteins but so what?
you've phrased that as though you expect someone to dispute it.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 11 Nov 2015, 22:06
This is unexpected.  I figured Momo was such a goody-goody that she wouldn't be able to resist the urge to report it.

With Momo, the accent on "goody-goody" is on the "good". While many "goody-goodies" are self-righteous prigs, nasty, intolerant and cruel, some of them are just trying to be the best person they can be, and that means not being an asshole.

Yes, she thought of reporting it. May showed her that that action would have a non-zero asshole content.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: J on 11 Nov 2015, 22:28
yeah, pretty much.

still, the fact that she requires justification for bots who behave out of line with her personal ideology does inch her into 'annoyingly
 judgmental doogooder' territory for me. though that's still a long way off from 'self-richeous asshole' jurisdiction.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Tova on 11 Nov 2015, 23:16
still, the fact that she requires justification for bots who behave out of line with her personal ideology does inch her into 'annoyingly
 judgmental doogooder' territory for me. though that's still a long way off from 'self-richeous asshole' jurisdiction.

You mean, she is behaving out of line with your personal ideology?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 11 Nov 2015, 23:22
More like she doesn't have an entry in her Social Protocol Database for something like this.

And May? A speech like that probably would have just gotten ya fixed up with Dale earlier than later...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Tova on 11 Nov 2015, 23:31
More like she doesn't have an entry in her Social Protocol Database for something like this.

Well, she quickly acknowledged that her immediate reaction to the situation hadn't taken everything into account. That maybe she was wrong. So maybe she found something in her database that would make do.

Not an easy thing to do. I'm still working on it.  :-\
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 11 Nov 2015, 23:36
May, if you can't tell the difference between people being forced into the black economy by circumstances and outright embezzlement to obtain non-necessity goods, then you need to pay more attention at the support group meetings.

In some ways, Momo is a 'Trust Fund Activist': Someone with good intentions and who genuinely wants to help but whose social background renders her unable to really grasp the true nature of the issues. As a consequence, she comes across as condescending or pious to those who actually do live with the issues.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 11 Nov 2015, 23:37
I stand by my assertion that Momo in her current chassis is basically "teen Momo".  Though she may have skills and knowledge that allow her to interact better in an adult world, and hold her job at the library, she is still growing as a person.  She still can't grok how some things work, but isn't the sort who would shut out voices (like May) who offer a different perspective.  At some point, if the comic continues long enough, she might migrate to another chassis when she feels more "mature".
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 12 Nov 2015, 01:22
I stand by my assertion that Momo in her current chassis is basically "teen Momo".  Though she may have skills and knowledge that allow her to interact better in an adult world, and hold her job at the library, she is still growing as a person.  She still can't grok how some things work, but isn't the sort who would shut out voices (like May) who offer a different perspective.  At some point, if the comic continues long enough, she might migrate to another chassis when she feels more "mature".

Something like this (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=642)?  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: osaka on 12 Nov 2015, 02:40
I could see May on that one tho.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: swapna on 12 Nov 2015, 03:07
I stand by my assertion that Momo in her current chassis is basically "teen Momo".  Though she may have skills and knowledge that allow her to interact better in an adult world, and hold her job at the library, she is still growing as a person.  She still can't grok how some things work, but isn't the sort who would shut out voices (like May) who offer a different perspective.  At some point, if the comic continues long enough, she might migrate to another chassis when she feels more "mature".
I don't know, growing as a person and hearing dissenting voices is something I hope I will do at all ages, even though I'm really not a teenager any more. She is young (afair, she's between two and three years, comic time), but AI learn and mature faster than humans.

May, if you can't tell the difference between people being forced into the black economy by circumstances and outright embezzlement to obtain non-necessity goods, then you need to pay more attention at the support group meetings.
Yeah, but she wanted to be a fighter jet. Maybe she qualified, but the military program stopped before she could get in? Or she was outright refused for "not being human"? There are similarities :)

In some ways, Momo is a 'Trust Fund Activist': Someone with good intentions and who genuinely wants to help but whose social background renders her unable to really grasp the true nature of the issues. As a consequence, she comes across as condescending or pious to those who actually do live with the issues.
I think you hit it on the head, there, with "trust fund activist" but she is actually not in a position to not know. She visits the meetings with May, and either she doesn't listen or doesn't believe the criminal AI (her first reaction to May in Dales glasses was to threaten her - yes, May was herself, but threatening her with trying to kill her? Isn't that a bit much for a few insults?)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 12 Nov 2015, 04:31
In some ways, Momo is a 'Trust Fund Activist': Someone with good intentions and who genuinely wants to help but whose social background renders her unable to really grasp the true nature of the issues. As a consequence, she comes across as condescending or pious to those who actually do live with the issues.

Remind me to tell you about my reactions during a conversation with the chair of the Sydney Sex Workers Collective some time. I make Momo look positively worldly. But like her, I listen. And like her, I hear. You'd be surprised how easy it is to relate to someone the polar opposite of "goody-goody" if you do that.

I always did see sex work as just another profession, intellectually. But talking with, and being friends with, sex workers aligned my heart with my head, despite my appallingly conventional and conservative background. Condescension is something I try to avoid. Going all pedagogical likewise. I fail of course, but at least I try, there's hope for me yet, so I'm told.

To repeat - the key is to try not to be an asshole. Do that, and you can't go very wrong. Don't do it, and piety or libertinism, they're just different styles of living. Actually, same if you do avoid it, "goody-goody" is more a personal style than anything else.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: J on 12 Nov 2015, 05:38
how open-minded momo is really remains to be seen.

on the one hand, she's not being an asshole about bubsy & the fighters, but on the other, said non-assholedom does appear to be contingent on finding some way to fit them into an acceptable slot in her existing ideological framework.

the real test will be if she asks bubsy about her 'reasons' for joining the military, only to get the answer "Because I wanted to.". likewise, if she were to find out that some of the battlebots do have other options, but chose that profession purely because it appeals to them.

how would she react to AIs who live lives she ideologically disapproves of without some justification she can accept?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 12 Nov 2015, 05:56
I stand by my assertion that Momo in her current chassis is basically "teen Momo".  Though she may have skills and knowledge that allow her to interact better in an adult world, and hold her job at the library, she is still growing as a person.  She still can't grok how some things work, but isn't the sort who would shut out voices (like May) who offer a different perspective.  At some point, if the comic continues long enough, she might migrate to another chassis when she feels more "mature".

Something like this (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=642)?  :-D

Without noticing that it's about 1000 off, before clicking I had thought you were suggesting this (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1658)...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 12 Nov 2015, 05:58
Something like this (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=642)?  :-D

Without noticing that it's about 1000 off, before clicking I had thought you were suggesting this (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1658)...

Speaking seriously, the second option is very much what I would expect an 'adult' Momo chassis would look like.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: katsmeat on 12 Nov 2015, 07:02

The purpose of the Bechdale test  is to make a real world point.  It (or the mechdaletest) doesn't seem to have any relevance in a world without a community of AIs
Passing or failing it when applied to AI's isn't really a thing.

the thing about the bechdale test that people have a tendency to miss is that it's really only meaningful in aggregate, as a generalized 'average' for the roll of female characters in fiction. the question of whether or not any given individual work passes it is completely meaningless and irrelevant.

remember, Gravity & Pacific Rim both fail the test, but Twilight is bechdale approved.

I agree completely.  Examining media with Bechdale is  very much like measuring a person's fitness with their BMI - they're both simple and easy-to-apply tests that can provide some insight. But can also be very misleading.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 12 Nov 2015, 07:47
Yes, I said "people". They're not homo sapiens and not made of proteins but so what?
you've phrased that as though you expect someone to dispute it.

Every now and then somebody here does just that.

They invariably turn out to also be racist about carbon-based people. Go figure. After they reveal that they don't last long.

Over in the QC world, AnthroPCs used to be referred to as "pets", and it took a long struggle and a constitutional amendment to get them even legal rights. Legal protection we've seen does not prevent job discrimination.

EDIT:
I got some feedback about this post which combined firmness and courtesy.

So, in the hope of undoing overstatements:
- The next person who registers and questions the status of QC AIs deserves to be treated as non-racist until they prove otherwise
- Everyone here now is being a DHB about fictional silicon-based people
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: J on 12 Nov 2015, 08:47
in comic-time, that 'long struggle' from pets to citizens has been what, 18 months or so?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 12 Nov 2015, 08:57
in comic-time, that 'long struggle' from pets to citizens has been what, 18 months or so?

That's a good question; we don't know how long ago this happened or how long ago sentient AIs were invented. We know that Station existed long enough ago that he was able to be Hannelore's best friend when she was around 13-ish (about 10 years ago, in-universe). Station also noted that most of Elicott-Chatham Industries' major in-house AIs were named by Hannelore at around this time (and that she was very literal in her name choices).

However, I can't see Dr Elicott-Chatham allowing an experimental AI to work with his severely mentally-disturbed daughter, so it is possible that AIs existed long before that in the QC-verse; long enough for the doctor to have confidence in Station's stability and his ability to handle Hannelore's needs. It is quite possible that the main human characters went through their entire teen and college years with AIs and Synthetics being an everyday part of life and AI civil rights being the hot-button campus debate flashpoint during their freshman and sophomore years. Sam, on the other hand, is young enough that a world without Synthetics as her everyday neighbours and peers is as strange to her as the stories I hear from my older relatives of Britain before the large-scale West Indian immigration of the 1950s and 1960s.

Given the number of Synthetics we see who still have pet-like functions and attitudes, I'd say that a major rights shake-up that occurred around 5-8 in-universe years ago is plausible in story terms. Certainly recent enough that some humans still resent Synthetics being considered equal to people and recently enough that some Companion Synthetics still think 'pet'.

Certainly recently enough that Bubbles may remember hearing some in her chain of command criticising her squad-buddies for befriending her as it was like 'personifying your squad's Hummer or something'.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: J on 12 Nov 2015, 09:04
actually, if i can be permitted to enjoy a bit of a meta-moment, the progression in the depiction of the robot characters in QC has been kind of an interesting case-study in the evolution of long-form fiction & how it changes along with the author. the Anthro-PCs were originally just silly comic relief sidekicks who existed to offset some of the strip's heavy drama & make technology related puns. but at some point it seems jeph started thinking a bit more deeply about the fictional world he had created and the roll of the machine-men within it. their narrative roll in the story shifted to reflect their social roll in the setting.

then at some point, i think jeph started thinking about things a bit more about the sociopolitical & philosophical ramifications of AI, and the depiction shifted again to reflect that.

makes me wonder if we'll ever see 'ol PT410X (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1105) again. how would he fit into the new narrative paradigm?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: MrWoodchip on 12 Nov 2015, 11:53
I was reading through some of the archive and I happened upon this strip: http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=668 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=668), so I guess it really has been less than 2 years since AI got equal rights.

I also can't remember enough HTML to embed the link in text.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 12 Nov 2015, 12:23
So much for her Lawyer then.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: osaka on 12 Nov 2015, 13:19
Her Lawyer clearly has no idea how to lawyer properly.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Tova on 12 Nov 2015, 13:59
... said non-assholedom does appear to be contingent on finding some way to fit them into an acceptable slot in her existing ideological framework.

At the very real danger of sounding like a broken record, you really are describing the behaviour of every person on the planet, including yours and mine.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 12 Nov 2015, 14:30
I also can't remember enough HTML to embed the link in text.
Code: [Select]
[url=http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=668]text[/url]
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 12 Nov 2015, 18:20
AIs got lawyers!

Dogs got bars!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 12 Nov 2015, 18:44
Is it a bar for dogs or a bar where dogs are welcome? Either way, I WANNA GO.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: DSL on 12 Nov 2015, 18:54
Maybe it's an association of lawyers for dogs, or lawyers who are dogs, or some amalgamation of the above.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 12 Nov 2015, 18:56
It's a sausage bar. They serve the finest sausages. Humans can only eat there if the dogs say it's okay.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Morituri on 12 Nov 2015, 20:38
Ok, if I had known what was coming today, I would not have read this comic while eating breakfast.  :facepalm:

Had you known what was coming today, why would you have read the comic at all? 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 12 Nov 2015, 21:06
Comic.

Lol. Momo trying to get into the robot fights is like me, a baby-faced white boy trying to find a pot dealer. Everyone assumes the police are involved.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Undrneath on 12 Nov 2015, 21:13
in comic-time, that 'long struggle' from pets to citizens has been what, 18 months or so?


However, I can't see Dr Elicott-Chatham allowing an experimental AI to work with his severely mentally-disturbed daughter,.

Actually that is just the sort of absent minded thing I would expect from Dr E-C.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 12 Nov 2015, 21:54
It could have happened more or less by accident as well. Station has normal operational reasons to communicate with his inhabitants. Simply keeping channels open to Hannelore would have required him to debug her.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 12 Nov 2015, 23:34
Corpse Witch fails at misdirection. Of course, in her defence, it's hard to keep a secret when your loud-mouthed employees insist on chatting about it LOUDLY!

Seriously, they need to have at least one or two rooms in the building that look like a skate park if they're serious about keeping it secret. The fact that that don't suggests that everyone (probably including lots of people in authority) finds it convenient to pretend it is a secret and just not talk about it.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: J on 12 Nov 2015, 23:35
oh, is momo gonna try to lecture them? because telling her to mind her own business could be a nice bonding moment for faye and bubs.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 12 Nov 2015, 23:37
oh, is momo gonna try to lecture them? because telling her to mind her own business could be a nice bonding moment for faye and bubs.

It's more likely that she'll deliver a borderline-hyserical rant that emphasises just how scared she is of the thought of humans and AIs being adversaries.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: TheCollector on 12 Nov 2015, 23:42
Is it a bar for dogs or a bar where dogs are welcome? Either way, I WANNA GO.
C'mon man! Rowlf! Rowlf from the Muppets. Dogs owned a bar for years. Duh. lol
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Tova on 12 Nov 2015, 23:43
It's hard to guess exactly what Bubbles' reaction to seeing Momo will be, but it will probably be closer to "what are you doing here" than to delight.

oh, is momo gonna try to lecture them? because telling her to mind her own business could be a nice bonding moment for faye and bubs.

I don't think so. She did say "I wish I knew what [the reasons for her engaging in military conflicts] were," only two comics ago. So that could well be why she's there.

It's more likely that she'll deliver a borderline-hyserical rant that emphasises just how scared she is of the thought of humans and AIs being adversaries.

Wow, you two really dislike her, hey?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: TheCollector on 12 Nov 2015, 23:44
Y'know, this comic has me wondering if the Robot Fighting arena is even a secret or if like everyone actually knows about it but they just go, eh, why bother them. Cause they're not so good at keeping said secret from the looks of it.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Storel on 12 Nov 2015, 23:44
Love the look on Momo's face. She is not buying "skateboarder slang" for a nanosecond. 8-)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 12 Nov 2015, 23:46
It's more likely that she'll deliver a borderline-hyserical rant that emphasises just how scared she is of the thought of humans and AIs being adversaries.

Wow, you two really dislike her, hey?

You see hate where there is none. I was very disappointed that Momo was initially more worried about her ideology than Bubbles' reasons for her actions and I'm fairly sure that she's still waiting to hear Bubbles' excuse for her 'unacceptable behaviour'.

However, that aside, you failed to read my post properly. I strongly expect that the problem Momo has with Bubbles' long-ago life choice is more informed by her own fears of human-AI antagonism than anything else and I'm expecting this to be reflected in her approach to this. I wouldn't be surprised if a worried Faye and Bubbles are more worried about Momo, at least at first.


[edit]
Fix'd tags
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Tova on 12 Nov 2015, 23:49
However, that aside, you failed to read my post properly. I strongly expect that the problem Momo has with Bubbles' long-ago life choice is more informed by her own fears of human-AI antagonism than anything else and I'm expecting this to be reflected in her approach to this. I wouldn't be surprised if a worried Faye and Bubbles are more worried about Momo, at least at first.

I appreciate and agree with this analysis more than your choice of the term "borderline-hysterical" in your previous post, which, if it didn't indicate hate, certainly didn't indicate any level of respect.

Edit because I can't stick around to continue to conversation: I am hoping that next week she, once again, surprises in her approach to the situation. I don't think she's getting enough credit.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: J on 13 Nov 2015, 00:02
Wow, you two really dislike her, hey?

not at all, i just find her judgemental attitude regarding the whole thing to be a bit annoying
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 13 Nov 2015, 00:15

not at all, i just find her judgemental attitude regarding the whole thing to be a bit annoying

*Chuckle*

I'm having to make a conscious effort not to identify with Momo. While I look nothing like her, personality-wise those who know me in 3D have been known to say "is she modelled after you?"

Oh, and not that I find you annoying, J, quite the opposite, it's good to have you around and to hear your views, they're interesting and thought-provoking. But perhaps you should think about whether
i just find her judgemental attitude regarding the whole thing to be a bit annoying
might seem to some to possibly be maybe just a tadge... judgmental?
 :laugh:

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 13 Nov 2015, 00:23
A bluenose who disapproves because she wants to dictate the morals of others?
An activist who is terrified that robots enacting degrading stereotypes will undermine difficult and continuing work for equality?

There's room for argument whether there's even a difference there. I think there is, and that Momo is the second of the two, but how on earth do you distinguish which is which from the outside?

We could see something unusual from Momo. She's been scared before but this runs deep.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Akima on 13 Nov 2015, 00:26
I appreciate and agree with this analysis more than your choice of the term "borderline-hysterical" in your previous post, which, if it didn't indicate hate, certainly didn't indicate any level of respect.
Well... Momo's chassis presents a female appearance, so I suppose it was inevitable that "hysterical" would be thrown at her eventually...  :roll:

It seems the robots have forgotten the first rule of Fight Club. And the second.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 13 Nov 2015, 02:06
It seems the robots have forgotten the first rule of Fight Club. And the second.

Well to be fair, that's the human Fight Club.
Robot Fight Club is a bit different in that they don't have Meat Loaf hanging about to get his skull smashed open. :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: snubnose on 13 Nov 2015, 03:20
I also can't remember enough HTML to embed the link in text.
That wouldnt help you one bit, of course HTML would be blocked.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Tova on 13 Nov 2015, 04:31
A bluenose who disapproves because she wants to dictate the morals of others?
An activist who is terrified that robots enacting degrading stereotypes will undermine difficult and continuing work for equality?

There's room for argument whether there's even a difference there. I think there is, and that Momo is the second of the two, but how on earth do you distinguish which is which from the outside?

I'm probably simplifying, but for me, that basic difference is motivation.

The first is motivated by a wish for power, or a feeling of superiority to others.
The second is motivated by a genuine desire to make the world a better place.

How is this visible from the outside? As Zoe has already posted, the visible aspect of this is empathy. Or, as she eloquently expressed in another post, the accent is on "good."

Momo surely ticks all of the boxes behind door #2. She has very clear goals, and what's more they are for the betterment of her kind, not simply of herself.

I find that admirable.

I would like to think (but am not necessarily seeing, at least not obviously) that those people who bash Marten for drifting and having no goals would admire Momo for basically being his polar opposite, at least in this respect.

I remember a couple of people bashing Claire when she first appeared as well. For similar reasons. She was obviously passionate about her vocation, and people initially got their noses out of joint when she expressed it.

/brain dump
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: MrWoodchip on 13 Nov 2015, 06:23
I also can't remember enough HTML to embed the link in text.
That wouldnt help you one bit, of course HTML would be blocked.

I also can't remember enough HTML to realise that the tags aren't HTML.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: pwhodges on 13 Nov 2015, 06:55
They're called BB Code - Bulletin Board Code.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 13 Nov 2015, 09:04
It seems the robots have forgotten the first rule of Fight Club. And the second.

Well to be fair, that's the human Fight Club.
Robot Fight Club is a bit different in that they don't have Meat Loaf hanging about to get his skull smashed open. :roll:
HIS NAME IS ROBOT PAULSON :claireface:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: J on 13 Nov 2015, 09:54
ugh
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Detachable Felix on 13 Nov 2015, 12:05
Is no-one else hoping Momo's come there to fight? She's small, but she could probably kick ass like River. Not a power in the 'verse can stop her :P
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 13 Nov 2015, 12:32
I wonder if her electrical discharge is a legal weapon in robot fights. Her ring name could be "The Electro-Cutie".  :claireface:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 13 Nov 2015, 12:51
she shoulda stayed with May.

I wonder if Faye'll vouch for her.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: J on 13 Nov 2015, 14:08
I wonder if her electrical discharge is a legal weapon in robot fights. Her ring name could be "The Electro-Cutie".  :claireface:

a much better question is this: how many of her old components (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1298) got ported over to her current chassis?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 13 Nov 2015, 15:28
"He turned to the robot, and said
'You picked a fine time to leave me loose eel' "
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 13 Nov 2015, 15:30
Better than a loose seal.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: DonInKansas on 13 Nov 2015, 15:37
Is no-one else hoping Momo's come there to fight? She's small, but she could probably kick ass like River. Not a power in the 'verse can stop her :P

A large piece of me hopes she takes the title.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 13 Nov 2015, 17:50
I wonder if her electrical discharge is a legal weapon in robot fights. Her ring name could be "The Electro-Cutie".  :claireface:

a much better question is this: how many of her old components (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1298) got ported over to her current chassis?

Given that she shocked Clinton so much that his shoe ended up on the top of City Hall... (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2068)

(EDIT: Had to search for the exact comic...)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 13 Nov 2015, 18:01
Can I be a bio-droid?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: War Sparrow on 13 Nov 2015, 18:12
Y'know, this comic has me wondering if the Robot Fighting arena is even a secret or if like everyone actually knows about it but they just go, eh, why bother them. Cause they're not so good at keeping said secret from the looks of it.

"Secret" AKA "better here, where we know about it and at least there are some form of rules to ensure safety, and no bystanders are injured".

Corpse Witch could stand to host a few seminars on what "secret" means though.



Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: DSL on 13 Nov 2015, 18:28
"He turned to the robot, and said
'You picked a fine time to leave me loose eel' "

"Four hundred amperes, just for copping a feel ..."
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 13 Nov 2015, 19:28
Well this is one poorly managed skate park.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 13 Nov 2015, 19:41
Well this is one poorly managed skate park.

I dunno, I've seen worse. Like the one near where I lived that had to be closed because (1) they had no insurance, (2) it was in an indoor carpark with nothing separating the skate park and the cars (seriously, a high enough jump and you went from skate park to car park) and (3) left the surfaces for skating in a deplorable state. The walls were like the bastard children of coarse sandpaper and pebbledash

Fun times (watching people crashing while trying to skate).
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 13 Nov 2015, 19:44
Did the fact that it was closed stop people from skating there?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: osaka on 13 Nov 2015, 19:51
Now that I noticed, isn't the dude in panel 3 that's talking with Barry (it was Barry right?) in what appears to be a male version of May's chassis? I wonder if 1.- he's an ex-convict and 2.- how many ex-convicts are in this situation (that of having to fight to earn some money).
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 13 Nov 2015, 19:56
Are you saying all blue robots are ex-cons? Dangerous thinking there :roll:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: osaka on 13 Nov 2015, 19:59
Are you saying all blue robots are ex-cons? Dangerous thinking there :roll:

Not really. I'm saying that, based on the data that May provided (cheap chassis given to her) and that Jeph provided (The specs), he could have been in that situation. It could also be that he couldn't find a cheaper chassis ofc.

And it could also be that it's 5am and my thoughts aren't as clear as they should be.

EDIT: I also thought at the moment that maybe they weren't available for public purchase (as in this being a government contract or something like that). Again, not my finest hour.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 13 Nov 2015, 20:02
"He turned to the robot, and said
'You picked a fine time to leave me loose eel' "

"Four hundred amperes, just for copping a feel ..."

I felt obliged to explain to my wife why I was laughing so hard.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: improvnerd on 13 Nov 2015, 20:36
she shoulda stayed with May.

May can't go anywhere near robot fight club while she's still on parole.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: J on 13 Nov 2015, 21:26
i do believe that's the point kugai was trying to make



Are you saying all blue robots are ex-cons? Dangerous thinking there :roll:

Not really. I'm saying that, based on the data that May provided (cheap chassis given to her) and that Jeph provided (The specs), he could have been in that situation. It could also be that he couldn't find a cheaper chassis ofc.

And it could also be that it's 5am and my thoughts aren't as clear as they should be.

EDIT: I also thought at the moment that maybe they weren't available for public purchase (as in this being a government contract or something like that). Again, not my finest hour.

somehow, i doubt that a cheap'n'shitty prison-issue chassis would do well in the illegal pit-fighting circuit. letting people enter who aren't at least marginally combat-ready really doesn't make for much in the way of entertainment value, or profits for the bookies.

unless it was like a 50 on 1 match, or something like that i suppose. "Tonight only, DEATHBOT v5.2.11b vs THE ARMY OF N00BS"
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: hedgie on 13 Nov 2015, 21:34
Good point.  If Gordon/Gary is a spider, and there are all the obviously non-human looking chassis around, it's safe to say that AIs probably have a different standard when it comes to personal looks.  Momo wants to pass, and be considered like a human.  May probably doesn't care, considering that she probably still wants to be a fighter jet.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 13 Nov 2015, 21:39
TOMORROW
is your reward for working safely Today.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 14 Nov 2015, 06:31
Did the fact that it was closed stop people from skating there?
Yeah, it did, mainly because the car park bought the skate park and extended the number of spaces it could offer.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Morituri on 14 Nov 2015, 11:51
On the other hand if you're entering a car in the Demolition Derby you don't enter the most expensive car you own. We could be looking at the chassis he wears for the fighting ring because when it gets broken the parts and repairs are inexpensive.  Even if it's not powerful/fast enough to make much prize money, that's all right if the prize money it makes can keep it repaired. 

He may have another chassis that looks like a puppy, or a gothic-lolita doll two feet tall modeled after Rozen Maiden.  Or, you know, he might live on a server downtown, spends his weekdays optimizing utility usage for city buildings, and this is how he goes out on the town on weekends.

As for the robot fighting ring being "secret", that's crock.  No place that relies on customers being present can be secret from the customers.  No coordinated action that recruits people can be secret from the population they're recruiting from.  And the police are members of the same populations.  QED.  That's sort of like the idiot BART protesters last year who couldn't figure out how the cops always knew where they were going to be - of course they were coordinating the whole deal on social media and that was all public, but they were still convinced the cops couldn't know unless somebody was ratting them out. 

In most cities across the US, prostitution is illegal.  But a traveler in an unfamiliar city can pick up a darn phone book and immediately identify places to call for a temporary partner of negotiable affection.  Seriously, just look!  If actual prostitution is illegal there, they'll be under some easily-identifable misclassification like 'massage' or something, and while the adverts won't actually say sex-for-money, they'll use pretty much every euphemism short of that.  Are the cops actually dumber than the average traveling salesman, or would busting the hookers just interfere with their profits?

And this is why I think any law which isn't 100% enforced at every opportunity should be repealed instead.  If something is neither clearly legal nor illegal with quick and effective enforcement, it merely promotes government corruption because the agents of the government will be able to shake it down for a cut of the profits in exchange for failing to do their jobs.

Underground fighting ring?  Same deal.  Customers know where to come, competitors know where to come, QED Cops know it too.  Not being busted means there are cops on the take, just like with prostitution.




Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 14 Nov 2015, 13:34
Someone once pointed out that honest cops do just the same thing, only they get paid with information and tipoffs instead of wrinkly heavily used cash.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Morituri on 14 Nov 2015, 14:10
Let me understand; you're saying that "honest" cops only engage in extortion for information? 

Sure, that sounds legit.  But that only makes me want to repeal the extortion laws if they're not going to be enforced.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: osaka on 14 Nov 2015, 14:49
You know that you need actual proof of illegal conduct to arrest someone right?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Mr_Rose on 14 Nov 2015, 15:17
You know that you need actual proof of illegal conduct to arrest someone right?
No, you need "reasonable suspicion" to arrest them. Proof is only required for conviction.

The problems happen when officers interpret "reasonable suspicion" to include such things as "he just looked like the type, y'know" and "my boss told me the guy was a crook" and the courts interpret "proof" to include stuff like "well they must have arrested him for some reason" and "the newspapers said they were a bad'un" especially when the alleged crime is a capital one and you're in a executing state.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: osaka on 14 Nov 2015, 16:53
Of course that is the problem. What I was saying is that even if you have reasonable suspicion of some of the acts Morituri mentioned, they're very hard to prove. Specially the prostitution example he's giving, because you don't know if the worker wasn't actually providing <insert service advertised here> and afterwards have sex because it's amazing or a similar reason.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Morituri on 14 Nov 2015, 19:14
Anyway, my point was that there is absolutely, positively NO WAY the cops don't know about the illegal fighting ring.

You can speculate all you want about why they're not making arrests.  My speculation is that the police and/or judicial, as usual where there are laws that are not vigorously enforced, are engaging in extortion. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Storel on 14 Nov 2015, 21:12
Anyway, my point was that there is absolutely, positively NO WAY the cops don't know about the illegal fighting ring.

You can speculate all you want about why they're not making arrests.  My speculation is that the police and/or judicial, as usual where there are laws that are not vigorously enforced, are engaging in extortion.

Or the cops may just not be very interested because, as May points out, "It's only illegal for boring reasons. Nobody gets killed or anything." They may be more interested in stopping crimes that actually hurt people, like murder and robbery. Nobody gets big promotions for busting a business for not having insurance.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 14 Nov 2015, 21:17
Actually, promotions are based partly on the number of arrests the officer makes.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Storel on 14 Nov 2015, 21:20
But do they arrest people for not having insurance? If you don't have car insurance, they just suspend your driver's license until you get some insurance. If a business doesn't have some required insurance, I'd assume they'd just close the business until the insurance was obtained.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 14 Nov 2015, 22:23
If the fight club doesn't have a business license then official responses could range all the way up to the Santa Ana marijuana shop raid (http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln--police-pot-shop-raid-edibles-20150612-story.html).
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3086-3090 (9th to 13th November 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 15 Nov 2015, 13:48
As I've said before, it may be that the Robot Fight Club is technically illegal, with the appropriate laws on the books, but it may be one of those activities that, while illegal, has a 'Blind Eye' turned towards it for various social reasons.

Undoubtedly, law enforcement will, on occasion, move in to to a raid or two, but I would suspect that that's more a PR Exercise just to keep the anal retentives happy, and unless something really serious is going on, it'll be more a case of 'Catch and Release' with a fine or a 30 day sentence kind of enforcement.