THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: BenRG on 11 Oct 2015, 13:52

Title: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 11 Oct 2015, 13:52
Okay, tried to cover as many bases as possible with this week's poll. Realistically, there are only a few likely options but I know that some of you guys have strong opinions on Bubbles and/or odd senses of humour and one should always try to keep the customer satisfied.

Personally, I'm voting that Faye refuses to be frightened off and Bubbles snaps, starts screaming at her to hate her already, possibly physically attacks her and finally ends up blubbering onto her Converses, begging her late squad-mates (and Faye) for forgiveness for being a worthless friend, an even less worthy team-mate and an utterly worthless person. There follows a significant moment when we learn just how badly Bubbles and the other Generation-Zero AIs (the ones that pre-dated decent AI civil rights legislation) were treated by some corporations and the military.

It's possible that the week may end on a light note. Probably a little joke by Faye at her own expense in an attempt to lighten the mood. The alternative is that Bubbles says she has to go home and Faye goes with her because she doesn't want to be on her own. The last panel on Friday is Bubbles sitting in her recharge chair in the corner of the repair bay with Faye sleeping on her lap as if she were the Warbot's very own teddy-bear.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 11 Oct 2015, 14:23
I wonder if the Vulcan boob squish works on robots.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: War Sparrow on 11 Oct 2015, 16:20
I wonder if Jeph will be celebrating Canadian Thanksgiving(Monday) and the comic will be late? i hope he does a turkey comic..I love turkey comics.

I think Bubbles will tell Faye to back off, and go home to zen. A conversation regarding feelings and boundaries should probably occur when both parties are less angry.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 11 Oct 2015, 17:59
A Bubbles Flashback in which we find out she had two Combat AI sisters named Blossom and Buttercup - and the horrible tale of what happened to them
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 11 Oct 2015, 18:32
"Bubbles comes across as a whiny child; we realise she's not PTSD at all, just antisocial and self-pitying;"

I find this option more off putting than the "Bubbles must have PTSD because healthy people aren't supposed to feel this way" attitude.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 11 Oct 2015, 19:06
In a conventional narrative, we'd eventually get the Bubbles backstory as she opens up to Faye about why she's so broken. Given how expected that is, Jeph may well go in another direction. This might be the end of our Bubbles interaction, as Faye learns some people are best let be, particularly in her new work milieu.

I'm still a little curious about what was going on with Momo and "My queen!"  Could there be a whole hidden side to AI society? Someone should ask Momo about it.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 11 Oct 2015, 19:29
Could there be a whole hidden side to AI society? Someone should ask Momo about it.

Yes, but humans aren't allowed to know about it.  See also:  Marten and Doradad speaking in Dude Code.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: geekd on 11 Oct 2015, 19:34
I've been trying to hold off judging Bubbles too harshly, but I can't any more.  She's a huge bitch, and I would not be her friend.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: TheCollector on 11 Oct 2015, 19:44
I've been trying to hold off judging Bubbles too harshly, but I can't any more.  She's a huge bitch, and I would not be her friend.
Yeah no. Did you not see her call herself broken? It's pretty much clear to me after that that she has whatever the AI form of PTSD is. Don't forget, all the humans on her squad were killed. That's bound to do something to you.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Tova on 11 Oct 2015, 19:52
I've been trying to hold off judging Bubbles too harshly, but I can't any more.  She's a huge bitch, and I would not be her friend.

That would be a win-win from her perspective.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: neurocase on 11 Oct 2015, 19:55
If she was that broken, why did she go to the party in the first place and make an obvious effort in the form of at least putting on lipstick? If she honestly thought there was no chance of it going well, she wouldn't have bothered. All she's doing is acting out after threatening very real physical violence against someone, and implying that there was never any chance it could have worked when clearly she thought it might have. To me, those aren't the actions of a broken person, or robot in this case. They're the actions of someone unwilling to make any allowances or give any lenience toward ingratiating herself into society.

EDIT: spelling hurrdurr
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 11 Oct 2015, 19:58
Don't you mean installing lipstick?  :claireface:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: MrNumbers on 11 Oct 2015, 20:25
It's interesting. I get the idea Bubbles is supposed to be sympathetic, but-

What motivates her? We don't know. What does she like? We don't know. Why should we like her?

I don't know.

Maybe if I had more of a reason to pity her? But I don't. She's obviously capable of making her own choices, and she's actively choosing to make terrible ones. If we had more interactions with her that were like the first time she met Pintsize, if we had more awareness of why she might be worth exploring as a character, sure.

I don't like her. I don't empathize with her. I don't pity her. I don't relate to her.

I feel I have the same problems with her that I do with Marigold: Jeph wants to play up this likable but flawed introvert, but plays too heavy on the flawed introvert angle so anything good that comes out of them just starts feeling disingenuous.

And while I'm not a combat veteran, I'm a PTSD riddled agoraphobic, so it's not like I simply don't understand.  I just simply find her reactions and interactions abhorrable. She's doing everything she can to validate her self loathing at the expense of the people around her, people like Marten. Why should I want to see more of her? What does QC get from her inclusion?

At this point, I think any redemption arc she goes through will either have to be really well done, or come across as trite and twee and false-feeling.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 11 Oct 2015, 21:00
Did you not see her call herself broken?
Did we read the same comic? She explicitly states that she is not broken. She's probably either lying or wrong, but still.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 11 Oct 2015, 21:07
Did you not see her call herself broken?
Did we read the same comic? She explicitly states that she is not broken. She's probably either lying or wrong, but still.

I was wondering if I was alone in reading it that way.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 11 Oct 2015, 21:19
She is not broken in the sense that you probably mean it, but she definitely has some issues.

Something tells me she gotten herself into such a rut, she can't see she's her own worst enemy at times.  I'm hoping that Faye doesn't give up on her, her history has led her to this point and it would be interesting to see just WHY she is like she is.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 11 Oct 2015, 21:29
I've been trying to hold off judging Bubbles too harshly, but I can't any more.  She's a huge bitch, and I would not be her friend.

I wouldn't want anyone that prickly or volatile for a friend either. She's had bad experiences, but is still accountable for bad behavior.

Oh BTW gender-specific insults like "bitch" or "cunt" have made people feel unwelcome, careful there. "Fuckhead" is forceful but gender-neutral.

EDIT: I forgot to mention a really interesting thing. The Pugnacious Peach is leaning backward. It took more than one attempt but Bubbles has intimidated her.

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 11 Oct 2015, 21:51
"Better minds than yours have tried"

But were they doing it professionally, or out of friendship?

Bubbles just pushed one of my buttons there. I'd take that as a challenge.... Broken machine? No. Hurt person? Yes.

Momo seems pretty cluey. I'd talk to her first.

And while we're at it - Faye could do with a bit of support now too. Like about a gigaton of it.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: downtowneddie on 11 Oct 2015, 21:53
I think what might be more worthwhile to observe is how Faye will deal with all of this.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Stoon on 11 Oct 2015, 22:00
Maybe it's because I'm socially incompetent, but I don't understand what Faye was trying to do. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 11 Oct 2015, 22:41
See, I can understand where Bubbles is coming from, in part. I know what it's like to be in a group or at a party and feel like everyone hates me, and are making fun of me no matter what they are actually saying. Any attempt to be polite must just be a fake and a lie. It's a matter of self worth, and the lack there of. That you think so little of yourself that the idea that anybody might like you is absolutely alien and can't be true. And yes, it's easy to get caught up in that cycle and think it's better for you and everyone else if you just aren't around.

I can't speak to Bubble's possible PTSD, but I see those signs of self loathing that I do identify with so strongly. It's an incredibly hard thing to break because you actively avoid the things that might help and seek out solitude and the company of your own thoughts, which are very much your worst enemy in this case.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Blackjoker on 11 Oct 2015, 23:12
Maybe it's because I'm socially incompetent, but I don't understand what Faye was trying to do.

She was trying to offer friendship and a bit of socialization to someone she thought might need it. Faye might have seen some of herself in her darker moments in Bubbles and thought that she could help, or at the very least offer her a chance to make some friends or meet some people.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 11 Oct 2015, 23:21
There is only one thing that Bubbles doesn't seem to have thought about: Why did she come to the party? If she's that worried about Faye calling her a 'chicken', then she has behavioural problems that probably go beyond the dreams of analysis!

In other words, on a certain level, she wanted to be humiliated or 'fixed'. Both options are a total can of worms in terms of her mental stability.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 12 Oct 2015, 00:19
That is indeed a very interesting point. Thanks for bringing it up ben!

Damn, at this point I wouldn't even bother coming to work. I said it in a previous thread: I just don't do aggressive behaviour. I'm having trouble having the slightest amount of sympathy to Bubbles but deep down all I can think of is a simple " Fuuuuuuuuuuuck it". I'd be searching for a new place immediately if I were Faye.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Wildroses on 12 Oct 2015, 00:24
I'm glad Bubbles stormed out of the party instead of having a great time. It's less clichéd.

I've read the story about how the emotionally damaged person was dragged reluctantly to a party, made connections, had a great time and either was instantly fixed to embark on life as an extrovert or took steps on the path to becoming fixed and an extrovert many times before.

To quote the great Ben Yahtzee Croshaw, not every introvert is waiting for the day somebody kicks down their door and forcibly drags them to a roller rink. I think Faye just learnt that.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Drunken Old Man on 12 Oct 2015, 00:54
I just hope we're finally finished with this deathly dull, one-note, thoroughly unpleasant character. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 12 Oct 2015, 01:56
Just going to step in here for a few minutes to offer my €0.02.

Let's review, shall we?

Faye invites Bubbles to a party. Bubbles says she'd rather not.
Faye, through pretty obvious and simple psychological manipulation, gets Bubbles to go to the party.
Faye throws party together at the last minute. Though that's par for the course with this crowd.
Faye, despite inviting Bubbles to the party, has the barest interaction with her work colleague other than introducing Bubbles to three people and leaves. Even when Bubbles says to Faye that she felt uncomfortable, Faye herself made no effort to put her at ease or to help her relax, instead sending a rather awkward Marten to try and talk to the antisocial combat android.

The onus here is on Faye, not on Bubbles.

Faye invited her to the party, despite the fact that Bubbles has through some subtle and not-so-subtle dialogue revealing that she is not a social person. And yet Bubbles made the effort to go to the party, yes, she was somewhat standoffish, but that's besides the point. If you get invited to a party by a work colleague, its not on you to try and talk to people, its on your colleague to introduce you and stick around for a while. Faye probably said somewhere along the lines of five sentences to Bubbles, leaving the android to the likes of Marten, Dale, Marigold and Pintsize. (A nervous and awkward Marten does not a good first impression make)

If I was treated like that at a party, I'd want to punch a wall too!

Both parties are in the wrong here, but it's Faye who let the situation get to that point.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 12 Oct 2015, 02:13
I hope you are not blaming Marten for acting the way he did. Because the average joe WILL be scared if anyone took him/her by the collar and lift him/her up that way.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 12 Oct 2015, 03:20
I hope you are not blaming Marten for acting the way he did. Because the average joe WILL be scared if anyone took him/her by the collar and lift him/her up that way.

No, of course not. I'm merely saying that Faye and Bubbles did not act in the most appropriate manner given the situation. In Marten's case, Faye gave him no warning that her guest was going to be a seven foot tall combat android with an attitude problem. Of course Marten is not going to give the best impression and given Bubble's attitude, his continued nervousness wouldn't have helped matters.

All I'm saying is that there are two parties at fault here, Faye and Bubbles. Or Fubbles. Or Baye(blade). (I have no idea why I did that)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 12 Oct 2015, 03:36
Or Baye(blade)
Their first opening is so fucking metal. Thanks for reminding me of it.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: jheartney on 12 Oct 2015, 05:47
Faye probably said somewhere along the lines of five sentences to Bubbles, leaving the android to the likes of Marten, Dale, Marigold and Pintsize.

I put that down to the compression of dramatic storytelling. IRL, there'd have to be more than that said. Still, everybody seems to give up on communicating a bit quickly.

Not sure what Bubbles is after when it comes to social interaction. She makes no effort to reach out to anyone, and gets offended by everybody else's initial efforts to reach out to her. Yes, she's a broken personality (notwithstanding her protests that she's not). Inviting her to a party without a plan to ease her into opening up was probably unwise, whatever Faye's intentions.

Assuming we don't see a Bubbles redemption arc, then this is a demonstration to Faye that trying to shut down your problems without dealing with them (i.e. being a dry drunk) is a bad idea. Maybe we'll see Faye at another meeting soon.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: anahata on 12 Oct 2015, 05:58
Not sure what Bubbles is after when it comes to social interaction.

It doesn't look like she wants social interaction at all. She's only come to the party because her distaste for social interaction has been eclipsed by an irrational urge to prove that she's "not chicken".
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Pilchard123 on 12 Oct 2015, 10:07
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTDCEiBeVAY
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Stoon on 12 Oct 2015, 10:14
Maybe it's because I'm socially incompetent, but I don't understand what Faye was trying to do.

She was trying to offer friendship and a bit of socialization to someone she thought might need it. Faye might have seen some of herself in her darker moments in Bubbles and thought that she could help, or at the very least offer her a chance to make some friends or meet some people.
It doesn't work that way in real life.  I've never made any friends at a party.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Stoon on 12 Oct 2015, 10:18
I'm glad Bubbles stormed out of the party instead of having a great time. It's less clichéd.

I've read the story about how the emotionally damaged person was dragged reluctantly to a party, made connections, had a great time and either was instantly fixed to embark on life as an extrovert or took steps on the path to becoming fixed and an extrovert many times before.

To quote the great Ben Yahtzee Croshaw, not every introvert is waiting for the day somebody kicks down their door and forcibly drags them to a roller rink. I think Faye just learnt that.
In my case it was the socially incompetent person was reluctantly dragged out to the bar.  At the bar literally nobody said one word to me.  So I got up, put on my jacket, and left.  Nobody noticed.  Nobody the next day asked where I had disappeared to. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 12 Oct 2015, 10:47
Kind of on topic, my new-found theme song fits this situation quite nicely.

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: themacnut on 12 Oct 2015, 11:26
Hopefully Faye learns from this not to invite Bubbles to any more social gatherings. Some people, whatever their reasons, just aren't the socializing type.

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: geekd on 12 Oct 2015, 12:23
Maybe it's because I'm socially incompetent, but I don't understand what Faye was trying to do.

She was trying to offer friendship and a bit of socialization to someone she thought might need it. Faye might have seen some of herself in her darker moments in Bubbles and thought that she could help, or at the very least offer her a chance to make some friends or meet some people.
It doesn't work that way in real life.  I've never made any friends at a party.

I think you are going to the wrong parties.  I've made lots of friends at parties.  I met my wife at a party.  Married 20 years, now.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: gopher on 12 Oct 2015, 14:24
I just hope we're finally finished with this deathly dull, one-note, thoroughly unpleasant character.
Agreed, wouldn't miss Faye at all.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Morituri on 12 Oct 2015, 14:45
I identify with Bubbles.  As an excessively large and obviously strong person, I deal with a fair amount of people being scared of me, and that strains personal interaction, particularly with strangers who haven't learned yet that I can be trusted.  And as someone who grew up in outer boondock, who expects the worst of small-town gossip  and isn't all that socialized to deal with crowds, especially crowds of strangers, I do have a powerful instinct to be ALONE when I've got emotional stuff I need to sort out.  People's constant insistence on "talking about it" is completely irrelevant as far as I can see; it's my insight I need, not theirs. 

Finally, while I didn't get the worst of it myself, I'm like Faye in having gotten enough HorribleCrap(TM) in my life to understand some of the issues that face people who've gotten much worse.   There's a point beyond which "normal" people are just not willing to consider dealing with, and once you're out past it, like Faye dealing with her Dad's suicide, you're dealing with the same USELESS responses from society at large that people who've dealt with stuff a whole lot worse are dealing with, and you know exactly how and why those responses are useless and you're in a unique position of being able to understand at least that kind of frustration.

I have a number of people in my life who have various degrees of PTSD from experiences that a benevolent God would have spared them.  I have a lot of sympathy for that, and I've learned a bit about when they need a lot of space and when they need a little bit of boundary-pushing.  It's always a balancing act, and sometimes it's hard to know how to be a good friend and emotionally hard to carry through on it once I've figured out what I need to do for them. But problems aside, they are among the best people and most powerful friendships I have ever known, and knowing them has been worth every second of it.

The kick is that Bubbles, who has serious PTSD issues, needs someone like Faye, who's dealing with / dealt with her own ration of HorribleCrap(TM) and knows exactly how useless are all the prior attempts at "helping" Bubbles undertaken by people who don't have that insight.

Anyway, this is my reading of it.  I think Jeph is doing a hell of a job dealing with this. 

I understand all the people saying they hate Bubbles and wouldn't want to be her friend; in fact that's a pretty normal response to anyone who's going through the kind of things that PTSD-affected vets go through.  Not a helpful response, but realistically it's about what you learn to expect of people who haven't dealt with some kind of horror in their own lives.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 12 Oct 2015, 14:51
Jeph has even gone as far as to say he wouldn't like Faye much if she was a real person.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Stoon on 12 Oct 2015, 15:18
Maybe it's because I'm socially incompetent, but I don't understand what Faye was trying to do.

She was trying to offer friendship and a bit of socialization to someone she thought might need it. Faye might have seen some of herself in her darker moments in Bubbles and thought that she could help, or at the very least offer her a chance to make some friends or meet some people.
It doesn't work that way in real life.  I've never made any friends at a party.

I think you are going to the wrong parties.  I've made lots of friends at parties.  I met my wife at a party.  Married 20 years, now.
You're not an introvert.   Introverts find parties stressful, not fun.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 12 Oct 2015, 15:20
I am an introvert. I find the right kind of parties, with the right kind of people, fun. And also stressful - they can be both at the same time.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Welu on 12 Oct 2015, 15:55
For my group of friends, a party is less than ten people chatting with a movie on in the background and having a few drinks. A party-party with lots of people filling the house and loud music so we can't hear each other freaks me out and I just cling to the people I know, unless they start mingling, then I will attach myself to the wall and just count down the time till it's socially acceptable for me to leave.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Tova on 12 Oct 2015, 16:32
It doesn't work that way in real life.  I've never made any friends at a party.

I think you are going to the wrong parties.  I've made lots of friends at parties.  I met my wife at a party.  Married 20 years, now.

Miscomprehension of the month, right there. Extroverts Are From Mars, Introverts Are From Pluto. Or something.  :psyduck:

Edit: You're an introvert? I guess it's just me that doesn't understand. Fascinating.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Roxtar on 12 Oct 2015, 17:07
I'm betting most of you aren't combat vets (or don't know a lot of combat vets very well).
Bubbles is classic "I don't want to talk about it, and I can't relate to you people since you have no idea what I've been through".

My Bro-in-law did tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. I'm 99% sure he's killed people and often has trouble dealing with the mundane aspects of normal life in light of what he's had to do.
A guy i grew up with who might as well be my brother also did tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. I know He's killed people... and that he's watched his friends die in front of him.

I don't ask either of these men about what happened. I figure they'll tell me what they feel like talking about. I don't try to "help them" get over it, because I have no frame of reference.

Faye has no frame of reference.
Bubbles as indicated that the name was given to her by her brothers in arms.

Bubbles needs to find her own path through her issues... and some snarky hipster barista probably is only going to make her feel more isolated from "normal" society.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Drunken Old Man on 12 Oct 2015, 17:09
I just hope we're finally finished with this deathly dull, one-note, thoroughly unpleasant character.
Agreed, wouldn't miss Faye at all.

I set that one up for you nicely, didn't I?  But, in all honesty, I'd have dropped Faye from my social circle years ago too.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 12 Oct 2015, 18:46
A friend of mine pointed out some simple logic.

According to the psychologists, extroverts gain energy from social interactions, but introverts have to spend energy on them.

According to the physicists, energy is neither created nor destroyed, but can only be moved around.

Social interaction, then, is a mechanism by which extroverts take energy from introverts.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 12 Oct 2015, 19:54
I am very interested in seeing how AIs interact in the QCverse. They have human aspects, so we can identify with them. But we must also remember that they are -not human-. They are similar, yet different.
So I am kinda disappointed with Bubbles. She is all too human.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 12 Oct 2015, 19:57
On topic: I am very interested to see what happens the next time Faye and Bubbles work together.

Off topic:

I'm so sick of this damn introvert/extrovert dichotomy.

Technically, I am an introvert. I need quiet time to recharge.

However, I can go to parties, interact with people, etc. I enjoy parties. You find what works for you, what you are comfortable with. If you need to, you can push your boundaries.

I'm just so tired of hearing people talk about introverts as though we are all social misanthropes who find parties (or social interaction in general) the most terrifying/unpleasant experience on earth. Maybe some people do find parties that way, but it isn't an all or nothing thing.

gah, I'm partly posting this out of an irritation that has been building for the last couple of years from all of the "introvert/extrovert" articles and I see plastered all over social media.
/rant
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 12 Oct 2015, 20:27
Insightful Marten is insightful.

Yes, Faye, just because someone is named Bubbles that doesn't mean they will float.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: plusorminus on 12 Oct 2015, 20:32
On topic: I am very interested to see what happens the next time Faye and Bubbles work together.

Off topic:

I'm so sick of this damn introvert/extrovert dichotomy.

Technically, I am an introvert. I need quiet time to recharge.

However, I can go to parties, interact with people, etc. I enjoy parties. You find what works for you, what you are comfortable with. If you need to, you can push your boundaries.

Wrong. Not everyone.

Quote
I'm just so tired of hearing people talk about introverts as though we are all social misanthropes who find parties (or social interaction in general) the most terrifying/unpleasant experience on earth. Maybe some people do find parties that way, but it isn't an all or nothing thing.

gah, I'm partly posting this out of an irritation that has been building for the last couple of years from all of the "introvert/extrovert" articles and I see plastered all over social media.
/rant

What do you care, though? I was raped twice by the same man. I suffer from extreme social anxiety and agoraphobia as a result. Good for you that you can go to parties and interact. How dare you act as if those of us who find that sort of activity scary as hell to be be some sort of of social defectives that are reflecting badly on you. (mod edit: removed a statement of supreme exasperation that went personal)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 12 Oct 2015, 20:44
I took a second look and it still sounds to me like his irritation is with pop psychology articles and not with you or others like you.

Agoraphobia is a different ball game from introversion, we should all be able to agree on that.

I cringe trying to imagine your experiences. I bet you have more in common with Bubbles than most of us do.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Reaver on 12 Oct 2015, 22:01
I think this is one battle Faye needs to not get involved in, she's too pushy  and Bubbles seems like she needs a lighter touch, someone with tact, and compassion... :facepalm:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Tova on 12 Oct 2015, 22:23
I apologise for the part I've played in escalating this whole introvert/extrovert thing. It wasn't my best post. The whole thing, if it's anything at all, is of course a sliding scale, not a black and white thing. And not necessarily what people (including myself) think it is.

The part I was objecting to was the idea that if you don't regularly make friends at parties, then you're going to the "wrong parties." My response to it was a complete blunder, but my policy at parties is to employ one of two "party strategies." I either to stick with people I know like glue, or find one person I make a connection with and monopolise them for the entire time I'm there. Neither strategy has ever ended with me making a new friend, you may be surprised to learn. It's a purely short-term strategy. Point being, it really has nothing to do with the parties, and everything to do with me.

There are a number of places where I do make new friends - parties somehow will never be one of them. I really can't explain why.

Back to the comic - I'm now wondering what Faye is going to do from here. I can't quite imagine her simply leaving well enough alone.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 12 Oct 2015, 23:28
One thing that you can always be sure of in QC - In the end, Marten understands people better than Faye can. Faye, after all, has spent most of her post-college life trying to avoid making connections, on a subconscious level at least.

Here's a thought about Bubbles - Why did her squadmates give her that nickname? I'm thinking that, way back when, her personality would have seemed more like Emily than anyone else. Just imagine what a naive, enthusiastic, intelligent and friendly personality would go through in war and you get some idea of how she became the being she is today.

On topic: I am very interested to see what happens the next time Faye and Bubbles work together.

It could be interesting. Bubbles might refuse to talk to Faye; she may even request that Corpse Witch fire one of them because she refuses to be in the same room as her "For her safety and mine".
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 13 Oct 2015, 01:38
One thing that you can always be sure of in QC - In the end, Marten understands people better than Faye can. Faye, after all, has spent most of her post-college life trying to avoid making connections, on a subconscious level at least.

That right there is a rather excellent point.
Good to see he picked up at least one thing from being a world famous dominatrix' son (other than the rope binding of course).

But seriously, Marten has always been more clued into people than Faye ever has and he is more than likely the most emotionally stable of the cast. As it looks at the moment, Faye focussing on Bubbles and "fixing" her problems means that Faye doesn't have to look at her own life and wondering how the hell she bollixed everything up.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: pwhodges on 13 Oct 2015, 02:42
it isn't an all or nothing thing.

It's the human urge to classify vs the natural way that things fall along a continuum.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: anahata on 13 Oct 2015, 04:36
Meanwhile...
I got nervous when Faye came up with that "I need a drink!" line yesterday after Bubbles left.
I wasn't sure if she really meant to find a bottle, or whether it was an ironic moment of self-awareness where that thought was immediately replaced by "NO I DON'T!"
But now she's talking the Bubbles incident through with Marten, hopefully that moment will pass/has passed.
Hopefully...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 13 Oct 2015, 05:58
I just hope we're finally finished with this deathly dull, one-note, thoroughly unpleasant character.
Agreed, wouldn't miss Faye at all.

Fine, we'll simply delete all the characters that people complain about and be done with it. QC then won't have any characters except Marten.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: War Sparrow on 13 Oct 2015, 06:01

Here's a thought about Bubbles - Why did her squadmates give her that nickname? I'm thinking that, way back when, her personality would have seemed more like Emily than anyone else. Just imagine what a naive, enthusiastic, intelligent and friendly personality would go through in war and you get some idea of how she became the being she is today.

Eh, somehow I doubt it. She probably got called "Bubbles" because she isn't cheerful and effervescent, and it amused them to call her something so opposite of her personality. It was probably something that came up during their specialization training (and is a lot kinder than some of the ones I've heard.)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Radium_Coyote on 13 Oct 2015, 06:10
Bubbles' nick was surely meant to be ironic.  And this is really Jeph hitting the nail on the head: Bubbles is broken, knows why, and has sort of accepted it, and WILL NOT be fixed.

Reality can change, and Bubbles will be unchanging.  You sort of cement yourself into a role.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: marsman57 on 13 Oct 2015, 06:18
I wonder if AI in QC-verse can have memories removed and if so if Bubbles considered it.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 13 Oct 2015, 06:23
There's a good reason for believing that memory erasure either wouldn't work or would actually cause worse trauma to Bubbles.

Our memories aren't like tape recordings. They're a framework of multi-linked data points and I suspect that the AIs memories work in very much the same way. So, the first thing Bubbles would have is a lot of de-contextualised personality quirks and other memories floating around. Imagine how traumatised amnesiacs get when they have skills and reactions whose basis they can't remember; it would be the same for Bubbles.

Secondly, Bubbles will have a huge gap in her mind between certain clock points. She knows its there and she knows that it's something bad or they wouldn't have erased it. What is it? She might drive herself into a psychotic episode trying to find out or perhaps being afraid to find out (c.f. the original Total Recall).
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 13 Oct 2015, 07:49
I just hope we're finally finished with this deathly dull, one-note, thoroughly unpleasant character.
Agreed, wouldn't miss Faye at all.

Fine, we'll simply delete all the characters that people complain about and be done with it. QC then won't have any characters except Marten.

(click to show/hide)
People probably complain more about Marten than they do about Winslow.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 13 Oct 2015, 08:05
Quote from: telsa(sic) on electriciantalk.com
Life is tough all over.

Especially if you don't like to be around people.

Those critters are just everywhere.

That made me think of Bubbles.

Would Raven be the right kind of company for Bubbles? She could fire up any curiosity Bubbles has left. She might be hard to intimidate.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 13 Oct 2015, 14:53
It was a nice try Faye, but with Bubbles it may have been too much too soon with the issues she has.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Tova on 13 Oct 2015, 15:13

Fine, we'll simply delete all the characters that people complain about and be done with it. QC then won't have any characters except Marten.

(click to show/hide)

That was a lot better than I was expecting.

Garfield Minus Garfield may have a new rival.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Detachable Felix on 13 Oct 2015, 15:55
That was actually pretty hilarious

I wonder what other strips could work with that theme?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: TRVA123 on 13 Oct 2015, 17:38
However, I can go to parties, interact with people, etc. I enjoy parties. You find what works for you, what you are comfortable with. If you need to, you can push your boundaries.

Wrong. Not everyone.

Then you don't need to. rock on.
Quote
I'm just so tired of hearing people talk about introverts as though we are all social misanthropes who find parties (or social interaction in general) the most terrifying/unpleasant experience on earth. Maybe some people do find parties that way, but it isn't an all or nothing thing.

gah, I'm partly posting this out of an irritation that has been building for the last couple of years from all of the "introvert/extrovert" articles and I see plastered all over social media.
/rant

What do you care, though? I was raped twice by the same man. I suffer from extreme social anxiety and agoraphobia as a result. Good for you that you can go to parties and interact. How dare you act as if those of us who find that sort of activity scary as hell to be be some sort of of social defectives that are reflecting badly on you. (mod edit: removed a statement of supreme exasperation that went personal)

I care because it does reflect on me. Because I am an introvert, and we can come in many flavors. And for some reason there are all of these articles and posts talking about introverts as though we are more fragile than others, as though we are incapable of interacting "normally". Not that there is any such thing as normal. These also tend to paint extroverts as airheads that only care about partying and are incapable of any intellectual thoughts.

I'm so sorry that you had to go through those terrible experiences, and I can completely understand why/how they have shaped your worldview and changed how you interact with others. However, you wouldn't say that your way of interacting is solely due to the fact that you are an introvert, would you?

However, this is a bit off topic. If other people are interested, I would love to discuss this further in either Discuss or Relate.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 13 Oct 2015, 18:14
Comic's up.

Faye is doing the right thing.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 13 Oct 2015, 18:29
A crushing blow to the Flairten ship.

I just like mixing names.

Clayeten
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: improvnerd on 13 Oct 2015, 18:41
What is Momo reacting to in the first panel?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 13 Oct 2015, 19:23
Probably something outrageously crude that May said.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 13 Oct 2015, 19:39
Meanwhile at that same time and location...
Hanners:  Check out this device my dad sent me.  You press a button and a space pizza lands at your exact location.
Clin-ton:  (dies)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Tova on 13 Oct 2015, 19:46
What is Momo reacting to in the first panel?

Rghfrgl's post.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 13 Oct 2015, 19:50
Could be something May's doing. But she doesn't have that 'put on, but resigned to it' look. She's not disgusted enough for it to be Pintsize. I'm guessing... Open mouth tongue wrestling between Dale and Marigold?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 13 Oct 2015, 20:15
Back to the comic - I'm now wondering what Faye is going to do from here. I can't quite imagine her simply leaving well enough alone.

No, she won't. I note that Faye doesn't have an "ass-" nickname for Bubbles yet. "Ass-bot" would be too easy. "Ass-muddle" maybe?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: downtowneddie on 13 Oct 2015, 20:22

Fine, we'll simply delete all the characters that people complain about and be done with it. QC then won't have any characters except Marten.

(click to show/hide)

That was a lot better than I was expecting.

Garfield Minus Garfield may have a new rival.

My Photoshop skills aren't really there, yet, but this one seemed worthwhile:
(click to show/hide)

Perhaps a new thread was born?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 13 Oct 2015, 20:39
Comic's up.

Faye is doing the right thing.

I am deeply relieved to see it.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Drunken Old Man on 13 Oct 2015, 21:07
I just hope we're finally finished with this deathly dull, one-note, thoroughly unpleasant character.
Agreed, wouldn't miss Faye at all.

Fine, we'll simply delete all the characters that people complain about and be done with it. QC then won't have any characters except Marten.

(click to show/hide)

That's a mighty nice strawman you got there.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Tova on 13 Oct 2015, 22:24
I just hope we're finally finished with this deathly dull, one-note, thoroughly unpleasant character.
Agreed, wouldn't miss Faye at all.

Fine, we'll simply delete all the characters that people complain about and be done with it. QC then won't have any characters except Marten.

(click to show/hide)

That's a mighty nice strawman you got there.

But the comic with no characters at all wouldn't have been nearly as amusing.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 13 Oct 2015, 23:09
This, oddly enough, is turning into a potential 'The Talk part 2.5' scenario. Faye hanging out with Claire and Marten and, possibly, getting to know Claire better (and maybe the two of them confronting their mutual low-level antagonism).

BTW - You can tell Faye is under pressure; her native Georgian accent has started to come out

A crushing blow to the Flairten ship.

I'm pretty sure that this subject is many readers' secret poison about which they will never openly confess! :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 13 Oct 2015, 23:22
Meanwhile at that same time and location...
Hanners:  Check out this device my dad sent me.  You press a button and a space pizza lands at your exact location.
Clin-ton:  (dies)

Pizza landed on him. :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 14 Oct 2015, 02:14
I have to agree with the the guy on the Subreddit who said that, out of sight of us, Claire stepped on Martin's foot when, in panel 3, he said: "But you're always welcome!", making him hurriedly add: "I mean, not for the smooching part!"
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 14 Oct 2015, 04:36

Fine, we'll simply delete all the characters that people complain about and be done with it. QC then won't have any characters except Marten.

(click to show/hide)

That was a lot better than I was expecting.

Garfield Minus Garfield may have a new rival.

My Photoshop skills aren't really there, yet, but this one seemed worthwhile:
(click to show/hide)

Perhaps a new thread was born?

Nice one! QC's backgrounds are way, way more complex  than Garfield's, so removing characters is a challenge. You found a great workaround. I got lucky - a recent strip with a relatively simple background that made the absolutely perfect joke when all the other characters were removed. (Hardest part of mine was removing May from the background of the first panel - she was standing in front of a door.)

That's a mighty nice strawman you got there.

Didn't get the joke, huh?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 14 Oct 2015, 04:46
Subreddit
I don't know why, but I always think it's strange that you frequent both the subreddit and here. I'm not saying stop, and you're probably not the only one, but I think you're the only one I've ever heard mention it.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 14 Oct 2015, 08:52
I do too. Can't get enough QC discussion. I sometimes drop in on the tvtropes QC thread too.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 14 Oct 2015, 13:29
At least Faye had the sense to ask for help this time.

And there goes Marten torpedoing all those ships.  :-G
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: geekd on 14 Oct 2015, 17:16
Oh BTW gender-specific insults like "bitch" or "cunt" have made people feel unwelcome, careful there. "Fuckhead" is forceful but gender-neutral.


Really?  People like that actually exist?  I though that was just a Reddit myth.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Tova on 14 Oct 2015, 17:30
I have to agree with the the guy on the Subreddit who said that, out of sight of us, Claire stepped on Martin's foot when, in panel 3, he said: "But you're always welcome!", making him hurriedly add: "I mean, not for the smooching part!"

I'm quite tickled by the idea that there are readers who saw that last panel and thought to themselves, "Marten is being quite awkward - there must be some explanation."
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 14 Oct 2015, 18:06
Oh BTW gender-specific insults like "bitch" or "cunt" have made people feel unwelcome, careful there. "Fuckhead" is forceful but gender-neutral.


Really?  People like that actually exist?  I though that was just a Reddit myth.
People who feel that the use of gender-specific insults is more important than the comfort of others? Probably, but not here.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Akima on 14 Oct 2015, 18:08
Faye being self-aware and sensible? Into what parallel universe have I fallen?

BTW - You can tell Faye is under pressure; her native Georgian accent has started to come out
Every time someone refers to Faye's "Georgian" accent, I imagine her sounding vaguely Russian (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=142) (even though I know that Georgian is a different language, unrelated to Russian, and so presumably producing a different accent when speaking English).

What is Momo reacting to in the first panel?
Someone just told her that Bubbles left the party before she could get her phone-number, MAC address or whatever.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 14 Oct 2015, 18:41
Comic's up.

Go, Clairemom, go!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 14 Oct 2015, 19:38
dord (http://dord.horse/)

Yelling Bird replacement? If so, I really like this.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Pintman on 14 Oct 2015, 19:58
Not to be the "hur hur, typo" guy, but it's now my headcannon that "impresonal" is the Canadian spelling of "impersonal".



BTW - You can tell Faye is under pressure; her native Georgian accent has started to come out
Every time someone refers to Faye's "Georgian" accent, I imagine her sounding vaguely Russian (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=142) (even though I know that Georgian is a different language, unrelated to Russian, and so presumably producing a different accent when speaking English).


One time I was staying at a hotel in Atlanta and the girl at the desk was from Russia. She had a combination Russian and Georgian (the state, not the country) accent, and it was the cutest thing evar!

Okay, I'll go back to lurking now.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 14 Oct 2015, 20:11
I find this funny and relatable.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 14 Oct 2015, 21:02
Isn't a were-jaguar just a transformer?  :claireface:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 14 Oct 2015, 21:23
Isn't a were-jaguar just a transformer?  :claireface:
People will write fan-fiction about the strangest things.
(http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/transformers/images/2/2c/Alternatorsravagejaguar.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20061228210325)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 14 Oct 2015, 21:34
Oh BTW gender-specific insults like "bitch" or "cunt" have made people feel unwelcome, careful there. "Fuckhead" is forceful but gender-neutral.


Really?  People like that actually exist?  I though that was just a Reddit myth.

The moderators heard the same thing from enough people, and from people we've learned to respect for their level-headedness, to take the issue seriously.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 14 Oct 2015, 21:39
Not to be the "hur hur, typo" guy, but it's now my headcannon that "impresonal" is the Canadian spelling of "impersonal".
It's just like "metre" or "litre." The R and the E are reversed because French or something.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: geekd on 14 Oct 2015, 21:45
Oh BTW gender-specific insults like "bitch" or "cunt" have made people feel unwelcome, careful there. "Fuckhead" is forceful but gender-neutral.


Really?  People like that actually exist?  I though that was just a Reddit myth.

The moderators heard the same thing from enough people, and from people we've learned to respect for their level-headedness, to take the issue seriously.

I'm not joking, I really did think Reddit made up people like that.  People that would get offended because I used a gender specific insult *correctly*, and was not insulting *them*, but a fictional character. 

But I guess I'll have leave all you fragile, beautiful flowers behind.    People that take offense where none is intended is a huge pet peeve of mine.  You could say that it *offends* me.  Maybe that fits in your worldview better.

Love the comic, Jeph, but your fans are a little thin skinned for me, so, see ya.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Drunken Old Man on 14 Oct 2015, 21:52
"Once I get my own place, it will be 99% bookshelf by volume".

I like Claire.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3061 to 3065 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: pwhodges on 14 Oct 2015, 22:47
Love the comic, Jeph, but your fans are a little thin skinned for me, so, see ya.

This is Jeph's forum, run under Jeph's rules.  He is an administrator here, and so could change things if he wanted - which it seems he doesn't.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 14 Oct 2015, 23:15
Global Moderator Comment And hurling insults at other members is a sure fire way to get our attention - and not in a 'Nice, friendly chat' kind of way, so it ends now!


Is Claire hinting at something here?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 14 Oct 2015, 23:22
Several things jump to mind in this strip.

Panel 2 - You can't tell me that Claire isn't thinking 'our place' when she says 'my place'. I do hope that Marten realises he needs to budget for a library as one of the rooms.

Panel 3 - Yeah, it looks like Faye has the same opinion as me on what might be going on behind closed doors at Casa Augustus.

Panel 4 - Claire gets a bonus point for not being so squicked out that she visibly freaks at the thought of her mother having a wild personal life. Marten, meanwhile, gets a bonus point for protesting at the impersonalisation of sex in modern society.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 14 Oct 2015, 23:28
Claire's a cool chick.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: theMarc on 14 Oct 2015, 23:35
"My sex life?  Yes, yes, I've got top men working on it as we speak."
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Shjade on 15 Oct 2015, 00:07
"My sex life?  Yes, yes, I've got top men working on it as we speak."

I imagine this would make for exciting phonecalls from time to time.

Or, ooh, Skype calls, with video!

You know, for project updates.



(I realize the issue's been resolved, but...can't help myself: geekd - "People that would get offended because I used a gender specific insult *correctly*" -- I don't think I've ever seen someone try to defend their choice of insults with "but I used it correctly!" before. That gets a point for originality and audacity (half a point from each), even though it's still wrong.)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: improvnerd on 15 Oct 2015, 00:55
"My sex life?  Yes, yes, I've got top men working on it as we speak."

"Who?"

"Top... men."
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: bhtooefr on 15 Oct 2015, 01:56
Who says they're top, or that they're men? I mean, they could be bottom were-jaguars.

Also, I wonder what Claire's opinion of e-books is. I'm guessing she prefers the physical organization of a paper library, though, based on this: http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2208
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 15 Oct 2015, 03:35
"Bottom were-jaguars"? Is that some kind of furry gay porn fetish I haven't heard of?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: War Sparrow on 15 Oct 2015, 05:36
Well, it probably is for somebody. Probably a man named Hans, who lives in Siberia for the ice fishing. He mails Claire were-jaguar fiction, since she is his favourite niece.

/end headcanon



Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 15 Oct 2015, 07:41
Were-Jaguar? What does Monica Villarreal have to do with this?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 15 Oct 2015, 09:59
"Bottom were-jaguars"? Is that some kind of furry gay porn fetish I haven't heard of?

Clearly you haven't read anything from Claire's browser history
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: ysth on 15 Oct 2015, 11:34
Wow, Jeph's Blambot Casual font has a really really horrible %.

Way too Pyramus and Thisbe.

By the way, and I say this only because I believe it would be fair use of the font in my jurisdiction, if you are remixing comics and need to replace dialog, you can screenshot the type-tester at https://typekit.com/fonts/blambot-casual
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Akima on 15 Oct 2015, 19:30
Wow! Bubbles needs more robust exercise gear! Kevlar? Chain mail? Solid rubber? Steel?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 15 Oct 2015, 19:33
:(
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: wlewisiii on 15 Oct 2015, 19:47
Wow! Bubbles needs more robust exercise gear! Kevlar? Chain mail? Solid rubber? Steel?

Been there. Remember having to repair the plaster hole in the wall. But it's easier than trying to punch a 360 mm LOS thickness of steel and I made that mistake once too...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 15 Oct 2015, 20:03
Oof. I have been there. Sort of. Minus the rest of Bubbles' past.

Bubbles hates that she acted the way she did. This suggests she actually liked Faye's friends more than she was willing to admit.

This is painful, but hopeful for the future...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: WareWolf on 15 Oct 2015, 20:06
Bubbles' storyline just got a lot more interesting.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: SubaruStephen on 15 Oct 2015, 20:19
I can't tell what Bubbles is beating on worse, the bags or her own self.

:cry:
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: TheCollector on 15 Oct 2015, 20:25
Oh yeeeeeaaahhhh, Bubbles SO isn't suffering from PTSD huh people who said she was just a bitch?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 15 Oct 2015, 20:33
Welp!  I guess Jeph can't write an introvert who is content to be an introvert, or keep a character nice and static.

I gave him way too much credit.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 15 Oct 2015, 20:35
...why should he?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: chaospersonified on 15 Oct 2015, 20:38
...why should he?

Seriously.

Just because you can write something isn't reason to write it.

I'm an introvert myself, but I don't read fiction to find people similar to myself.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 15 Oct 2015, 20:44
I'm honestly not sure if I'm an extrovert or an introvert. Maybe both.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 15 Oct 2015, 20:55
...why should he?

Because it gets rather dull when characters morph into how Jeph thinks people should behave.

My favorite comedies usually involve diverse groups of people forming unlikely friendships.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Tova on 15 Oct 2015, 21:10
I'm trying to get my head around this complaint.
I don't even know where to begin.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 15 Oct 2015, 21:19
  • You take it upon yourself to assume from one of the strips that the character is an "introvert."
  • Later on, you take it upon yourself to assume, on a similarly flimsy basis, that the character is an "extrovert."

In the first matter, there was some wishful thinking involved.

This new strip indicates a disappointment in solitude unbecoming of an introvert.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Tova on 15 Oct 2015, 21:26
  • You take it upon yourself to assume from one of the strips that the character is an "introvert."
  • Later on, you take it upon yourself to assume, on a similarly flimsy basis, that the character is an "extrovert."

In the first matter, there was some wishful thinking involved.

This new strip indicates a disappointment in solitude unbecoming of an introvert.

How do you know it's disappointment in solitude? It could just as well be disappointment in a lack of friendship. Quite a different thing (I personally value friendships just as highly as I value my times of solitude). Or it could be something different again that we haven't thought of.

Maybe you're not giving Jeph enough credit.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: St.Clair on 15 Oct 2015, 21:47
Oof. I have been there. Sort of. Minus the rest of Bubbles' past.

Bubbles hates that she acted the way she did. This suggests she actually liked Faye's friends more than she was willing to admit.

This is painful, but hopeful for the future...

I take it that she's scolding herself for thinking that it might have gone any other way - for having hope that it might.  That she might actually enjoy a social situation.
What a stupid thing to think, right?

EDIT:  Also, for what it's worth, I identify/classify myself very much as an introvert.  Always have.
Crucially, however, I realized in my twenties that I'd been trying to pretend that was all that I was, because trying to be social meant making myself vulnerable to others - something I had little experience, skill, or confidence with, and went about it badly.  Which meant that, in my clumsy attempts, I experienced a lot of rejection.  And that hurt, so I'd slink back to my room and try to tell myself I didn't need or want any of that, and those grapes were sour anyway.
This was a profoundly unhealthy cycle, and I wasn't able to break it until I became aware of it and accepted that I do want and need human contact, even if that exposes me to risk.
I'm still an introvert, I still tend to prefer quiet and solitude over big noisy crowds... but I'm more in tune with the emotional needs that I do have, for socializing on my terms and in my preferred modes, rather than denying them until they boil over and express themselves in uncontrolled and ultimately unsatisfying ways (as they did, and would continue to do unless acknowledged).
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 15 Oct 2015, 22:00
I'm an odd mix. At work, I'm an extrovert by necessity - downright silly at times, able to make jsut about anyone smile, even if they happen to be a customer who comes in pissed off. Outside of work, I just want to be left alone to be in front of my computer. I don't like going out, and I don't like parties, though the latter is probably due to my social anxiety as much as it is my need/love for private space.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 15 Oct 2015, 22:09
Is the "stupid punching bsg" just a typo or am I missing some indie thing going on?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: QuestionableIntentions on 15 Oct 2015, 22:12
I'm trying to get my head around this complaint.
  • Jeph writes a new character into the story.
  • You take it upon yourself to assume from one of the strips that the character is an "introvert."
  • Later on, you take it upon yourself to assume, on a similarly flimsy basis, that the character is an "extrovert."
  • You immediately conclude that Jeph must be incapable of writing about "introverts," or at least your conception of one.
  • You further conclude that the cast are not diverse.
I don't even know where to begin.


Nah I get it. Introverts are often portrayed as "wrong" or "not trying enough" or something. Maybe Citizen First Class is an introvert and felt good getting a positive example for once, maybe he/she isn't and is just pissed about stereotypes.

Also: poor, poor Bubbles  :-(
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 15 Oct 2015, 22:15
..........

Ummmmm




Dang!!!!  :(
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Tova on 15 Oct 2015, 22:17
Is the "stupid punching bsg" just a typo or am I missing some indie thing going on?

Probably a typo, but I like to imagine Bubbles sitting at a computer angrily punching (ha) those words, typo and all, into her diary.

Still a typo with either interpretation, I suppose.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Mad Cat on 15 Oct 2015, 22:49
Okay. Somebody's got issues. Not saying who, but I think they might be red and currently inhabit a combat android chassis. Just sayin'.

Her name rhymes with Troubles.














It's Bubbles.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 15 Oct 2015, 23:26
Oh, Bubbles! You poor girl!

Now, surprisingly, the ball is back in Faye's court. If she tries again when she next sees Bubbles, things may work out. Bubbles is expecting her to hate her and I doubt that she'll take the initiative to apologise or even be able to react positively to an apology. However, if Faye keeps pounding on the wall, I think that she may get a breakthrough.

I just think that Faye will be pleasantly surprised about how grateful Bubbles will be if she so much as talks to her the next time they meet.

Wow! Bubbles needs more robust exercise gear! Kevlar? Chain mail? Solid rubber? Steel?

I think that's missing the point. She wanted to kill something and killing a punching bag doesn't carry unfortunate legal penalties.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Penquin47 on 15 Oct 2015, 23:28
I'm trying to get my head around this complaint.
  • Jeph writes a new character into the story.
  • You take it upon yourself to assume from one of the strips that the character is an "introvert."
  • Later on, you take it upon yourself to assume, on a similarly flimsy basis, that the character is an "extrovert."
  • You immediately conclude that Jeph must be incapable of writing about "introverts," or at least your conception of one.
  • You further conclude that the cast are not diverse.
I don't even know where to begin.


Nah I get it. Introverts are often portrayed as "wrong" or "not trying enough" or something. Maybe Citizen First Class is an introvert and felt good getting a positive example for once, maybe he/she isn't and is just pissed about stereotypes.

Also: poor, poor Bubbles  :-(

Yeah.  It would be one thing if this weren't at the very least the second time we've seen this: a character is introduced who, for whatever reason, prefers solitude and lack of socialization to the group standard of "We should spend most evenings hanging out with at least some of our friends!"  In both cases, this has been shown to be the result of some form of psychological issues.  In Marigold's case, low self-esteem; now with Bubbles, PTSD.  It's only two data points, but both of those data points fall into "if you don't like socialization, then clearly there is something WRONG with you".  And that's a very common narrative, but it's also horseshit when it's the only narrative we ever see with people who don't like socialization.

You could also make the argument that Hanners falls into this narrative, although she's been a willing participant in the expansion of her social life all along.  She genuinely wants to push her boundaries and better fit into what she deems "normal".

On the other hand, we have Penelope.  She has a boyfriend and occasionally shows up to parties, but she's also very vehement that spending an evening reorganizing her bookshelves is just as valid a use of her time as spending it on a date.  That doesn't seem to have changed.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Drunken Old Man on 15 Oct 2015, 23:34
Is the "stupid punching bsg" just a typo or am I missing some indie thing going on?

Maybe it stands for Big Stupid Girl, which Bubbles seems to think that she is.

Looking at the pile of punching bags, Big STRONG Girl seems appropriate as well.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 15 Oct 2015, 23:46
I'm trying to get my head around this complaint.
  • Jeph writes a new character into the story.
  • You take it upon yourself to assume from one of the strips that the character is an "introvert."
  • Later on, you take it upon yourself to assume, on a similarly flimsy basis, that the character is an "extrovert."
  • You immediately conclude that Jeph must be incapable of writing about "introverts," or at least your conception of one.
  • You further conclude that the cast are not diverse.
I don't even know where to begin.


Nah I get it. Introverts are often portrayed as "wrong" or "not trying enough" or something. Maybe Citizen First Class is an introvert and felt good getting a positive example for once, maybe he/she isn't and is just pissed about stereotypes.

Also: poor, poor Bubbles  :-(

Yeah.  It would be one thing if this weren't at the very least the second time we've seen this: a character is introduced who, for whatever reason, prefers solitude and lack of socialization to the group standard of "We should spend most evenings hanging out with at least some of our friends!"  In both cases, this has been shown to be the result of some form of psychological issues.  In Marigold's case, low self-esteem; now with Bubbles, PTSD.  It's only two data points, but both of those data points fall into "if you don't like socialization, then clearly there is something WRONG with you".  And that's a very common narrative, but it's also horseshit when it's the only narrative we ever see with people who don't like socialization.

You could also make the argument that Hanners falls into this narrative, although she's been a willing participant in the expansion of her social life all along.  She genuinely wants to push her boundaries and better fit into what she deems "normal".

On the other hand, we have Penelope.  She has a boyfriend and occasionally shows up to parties, but she's also very vehement that spending an evening reorganizing her bookshelves is just as valid a use of her time as spending it on a date.  That doesn't seem to have changed.

The truth of the matter is, though, that the very nature of this comic doesn't really allow for an introvert to remain an introvert. Much as some might feel it sucks, a non-social person as a main (or nearly main) character in a comic that revolves around mostly-social people wouldn't really fit, and invariably would be boring unless there were some kind of evolution of their character - in this case, Faye's attempts to help Bubbles and her PTSD. Otherwise, there's no reason for that character to even be there, unless they're just there as little more than a prop due to their lack of interaction, or to play the part of the recluse that one of the characters visits occasionally.

In other words, from a purely narrative standpoint, having a character who doesn't want to talk to anyone makes for a very dull story - or in the case of this arc, would make the entire introduction of Bubbles (and the arc itself) entirely pointless if everyone were to throw up their hands and completely leave her to her own devices.

That, invariably, would result in people here railing about how no one tried hard enough to try and help/befriend Bubbles. No matter how Jeph writes it, someone's going to not like the way the arc and characters are handled.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Pintman on 16 Oct 2015, 00:02
Is the "stupid punching bsg" just a typo or am I missing some indie thing going on?

Battlestar Galactica?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 16 Oct 2015, 00:23
Maybe Bubbles needs a companion AnthroPC. Or a kitten.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Rghfrgl on 16 Oct 2015, 00:28
Not that I don't want to see what happens next time Faye goes to work, but I hope the party's not over yet. Wouldn't mind Claire interacting with the cast like yesterday(As opposed to sitting on the side commenting on conversations rather than being part of them) and qc tends to be good in general when the cast is altogether and can mingle.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Lubricus on 16 Oct 2015, 01:09
Is the "stupid punching bsg" just a typo or am I missing some indie thing going on?

She's just REALLY angry at the British Society of Gastroenterology. It happens.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 16 Oct 2015, 02:03
Remember when this strip was about people and interpersonal relationships instead of emo Blade Runner extras? That was awesome. If this week is any indication, it's now a 1:4 ratio, respectively.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: pwhodges on 16 Oct 2015, 03:25
Oh, indeed; and the relationship of robots of various kinds with the humans has been a feature from strip number 1.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: War Sparrow on 16 Oct 2015, 03:44
Introversion and extroversion don't really mean "how often one likes to socialize". It refers more to "how much stimulation does a person need?" and almost no one is completely one or the other. It's a continuum, not a dichotomy.*

*According to my entry level Psych 105 prof, anyway.

I hope Jeph expands on if, and why Bubbles has PTSD, too. "Been to war" isn't really a good enough explanation-it takes more than a really bad experience to develop something like that. Someone on here mentioned the idea that it was before AI rights had really cemented, and so Bubbles didn't really have a choice whether to be a combat AI or not. And being that she was stronger and faster than the humans, she may have ended up in situations she had no escape from.

Or she doesn't have it at all, and is by nature angry and unenthused by interactions with others. I like this option better.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Welu on 16 Oct 2015, 06:20
Is the "stupid punching bsg" just a typo or am I missing some indie thing going on?

It's an alternative to the Big Friendly Giant, in this case, the Big Surly Giant.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 16 Oct 2015, 06:52
Is the "stupid punching bsg" just a typo or am I missing some indie thing going on?

Battlestar Galactica?
That was my thought. SHE'S A CYLON!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Stoutfellow on 16 Oct 2015, 06:55
Remember when this strip was about people and interpersonal relationships instead of emo Blade Runner extras? That was awesome. If this week is any indication, it's now a 1:4 ratio, respectively.

Are you suggesting that Bubbles isn't a person?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Thrudd on 16 Oct 2015, 08:33
Also, just to raise a point, her PTSD may not have anything to do with direct combat at all since a soldiers training is supposed to include the tools to deal with combat stress long before they are mustered out on active duty. My guess is that this would apply to AIs just as much as it does to the bags of mostly water.

If anything, it may be the result of some other action where all he vaunted power, training and skills were of no use whatsoever.
An example would be This Horrific Tragedy (http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2015/10/04/all-my-babies-are-dead-says-brampton-mother-at-visitation-for-children-and-grandfather-killed-in-crash.html) where the first responders had to deal with the aftermath and the victims passing away right then and there as everyone was rushing to peel them out of the vehicle. :cry:

* do not click the link unless you are morbidly curious on the details.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 16 Oct 2015, 08:58
It's parallel to Faye's experience to lose key emotional support to violence.

Survivor guilt is a likely candidate too.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 16 Oct 2015, 12:10
If anything, it may be the result of some other action where all he vaunted power, training and skills were of no use whatsoever.
An example would be This Horrific Tragedy (http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2015/10/04/all-my-babies-are-dead-says-brampton-mother-at-visitation-for-children-and-grandfather-killed-in-crash.html) where the first responders had to deal with the aftermath and the victims passing away right then and there as everyone was rushing to peel them out of the vehicle. :cry:

* do not click the link unless you are morbidly curious on the details.

There's a special place in hell, if you believe in such a place, for idiots who get into the driver's seat with even a buzz going.

EDIT: Here (http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/vaughan-crash-leaves-first-responders-seeking-ptsd-help-1.3255946[/url) is an article relating to the first-responders' PTSD.

I'd also like to note, that the threshold for some people is lower or higher than others - for my friend, she was in a car accident with her two children. Though her injuries were relatively minor (she had a minor concussion, which while yes, still somewhat major, it could have been a lot worse), and her children were pretty much unharmed, she's still struggling with PTSD as a result of it. She ended up having to resign from her job as a stylist because when children screamed while getting their hair cut, it would take her back to the accident and presumably, her own children's screams.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: War Sparrow on 16 Oct 2015, 13:04
PTSD is weird. They actually don't know what causes it. It's linked to heart rate variability (if your heartate goes up when your excited, and down when your not, as opposed to being fairly regular) whether the person chose to be in or could escape the situation, if the person didn't wait six hours to go to sleep(there was a study done that linked sleeping right after a traumatic incident caused it to go into long term memory, before the body got the chance to trigger the parasympathetic nervous system with regards to the incident.) There are case studies of people falling at an airport, with no injury, and getting PTSD. There are people that get hit by trains and are fine. 
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 16 Oct 2015, 16:25
I was going to agree with Akima that Bubbles needs sturdier exercise gear.

But what is she mainjacking? If it isn't "My Litttle Pony" episodes, she could be much closer to Faye than we want to think. Maybe they -do- need each other...
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Akima on 16 Oct 2015, 16:30
I think the cause of PTSD is clear enough; traumatic stress (it's right there on the label). What is not clear is the mechanism through which it works, and why some people experience it following circumstances which do not affect others in the same way.

I hope Jeph expands on if, and why Bubbles has PTSD, too. "Been to war" isn't really a good enough explanation-it takes more than a really bad experience to develop something like that.
Also, just to raise a point, her PTSD may not have anything to do with direct combat at all since a soldiers training is supposed to include the tools to deal with combat stress long before they are mustered out on active duty.
I am puzzled by these postings above suggesting that the stress of battle is not a sufficient explanation for Bubbles' possible PTSD. Since the days when it was called "shell-shock", has not a major part of the literature on the subject related to military psychological casualties?

But what is she mainjacking? If it isn't "My Litttle Pony" episodes, she could be much closer to Faye than we want to think.
I thought she was just recharging. Though the cable is a bit thin for that, now I come to think of it (depending on the charging voltage, obviously). Bubbles must have some pretty solid energy-storage after all.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Omega Entity on 16 Oct 2015, 17:19
But what is she mainjacking? If it isn't "My Litttle Pony" episodes, she could be much closer to Faye than we want to think. Maybe they -do- need each other...

I figured it's her power supply or something. If she's an older model, she probably operates differently than the newer models, kind of like how new idevices use lightning cables now instead of those wide rectangular things.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 16 Oct 2015, 17:49
I think she's recharging.  She is and older model of military AnthroPC and it may also a faculty of her being an early Military Combat AI/AnthroPC.  You know, a limiting factor built into her by the military as a form of controlling her and her kind just in case.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 16 Oct 2015, 19:20
If she lives at the shop they may have 480V available. That cord doesn't look bigger than 16 gauge.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Storel on 16 Oct 2015, 21:24
I have to agree with the the guy on the Subreddit who said that, out of sight of us, Claire stepped on Martin's foot when, in panel 3, he said: "But you're always welcome!", making him hurriedly add: "I mean, not for the smooching part!"

I'm quite tickled by the idea that there are readers who saw that last panel and thought to themselves, "Marten is being quite awkward - there must be some explanation."

Marten being awkward? How unusual!  :roll:

If she lives at the shop they may have 480V available. That cord doesn't look bigger than 16 gauge.

I don't know enough about electrical stuff to get the connection between those two statements. Would 480V require a bigger cord? Or are you saying that a small cord could transfer more power if the voltage were higher?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 16 Oct 2015, 21:58
The latter. Power is voltage times current, so less current is needed at higher voltages to get the same amount of power. Other things being equal (there are a lot of other things to keep equal) a smaller cord can carry less current safely.

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Morituri on 16 Oct 2015, 22:54
Welp. 

Somebody's darned unhappy.  And as for whether she's in the business of beating up that athletic equipment or herself?  Embrace the power of AND, my friends.

This isn't even anything to do with "introverted" or "extroverted", for whatever that's worth.  At this point the character could be either one, and hasn't had occasion yet to be clearly visible as one or the other or neither.  Seriously; that's not the important issue here. 

There's lots of things she might need.  But a lot of them are probably things she's not ready to accept.  For example she probably needs someone to be around her for a while and really listen.  But she won't feel like she has the duty to tell them anything important, nor will she feel that they have the right to hear anything important.

So....  I dunno how a real psychiatrist would handle it, but for me this would be a "be present but be quiet" and "interact but interact about something else" kind of moment.  Like, I'd like to know more about robotics and how robotic bodies go together and work; I'd ask for help from her with that.  And if she has anything to say about the events of the previous night, start off by apologizing for pressuring her to something she didn't want to do and see where she takes it from there.

In a similar situation, I learned a whole lot about guns and gunsmithing from someone who really needed listening to about something else.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: ZoeB on 17 Oct 2015, 03:19
I think she's recharging.  She is and older model of military AnthroPC and it may also a faculty of her being an early Military Combat AI/AnthroPC.  You know, a limiting factor built into her by the military as a form of controlling her and her kind just in case.

No, it's just that all that power - power enough to disintegrate a punching-bag - has to come from somewhere. Pintsize's power requirements are like that of an electric bike. Momo's, like an electric scooter or segway. Bubbles - like an M2 Bradley. Power storage is a problem. I don't know how many kw/hrs she burnt up in her "exercise", but it would be a lot. She's drained - not just emotionally.

She needs help. She deserves help. That might be like trying to help a wounded tiger though, without a tranquiliser gun. Tricky. Non-trivial.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: J on 17 Oct 2015, 05:02
"My sex life?  Yes, yes, I've got top men working on it as we speak."

well it's either that, or you handle everything yourself.


If she lives at the shop they may have 480V available. That cord doesn't look bigger than 16 gauge.

well we could just chalk that up to artistic license, but where's the fun in that? i'm gonna say that her military-issued ac adapter uses some kind of super-conducting material in place of boring old copper wires.


Wow! Bubbles needs more robust exercise gear! Kevlar? Chain mail? Solid rubber? Steel?

I think that's missing the point. She wanted to kill something and killing a punching bag doesn't carry unfortunate legal penalties.

i doubt akima was being fully serious there.

but there is an interesting question to look at here; bubbles is using physical activity to burn off excess aggression, which is important because earlier a momentary loss of her temper resulted in several hundred dollars in property damage, and could have easily injured a (mostly) innocent human.

so then, why is a psychologically unstable a.i. allowed to walk around in a weaponized milspec combat chassis?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 17 Oct 2015, 05:06
Because it's her body.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: J on 17 Oct 2015, 05:13
and if she had been the control system for a tank or an aircraft carrier she could just take it with her when she retired?


actually, pintsize has a military issue chasis as well, but his was forcibly disarmed by government agents. and he is at least slightly less likely to kill someone than bubbles is.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: J on 17 Oct 2015, 05:22
more to the point, what happens next time bubbles loses her cool? will she knock a lamp post over, into the middle of a busy street? or perhaps punt a newspaper machine through somebody's windshield? or maybe she stays with the wall-punching and just takes out a load-bearing pillar, collapsing part of a ceiling onto some people.



it seems to me that her preference for solitude may be based at least partially on this; that she knows something like that might happen, & doesn't fully trust herself to behave responsibly to keep it from happening.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 17 Oct 2015, 05:45
I think people are overstating her danger by quite a bit. She did not hit Faye. She did not miss by accident. She was sending a clear warning to someone who doesn't take verbal or non verbal clues or requests to leave her alone. Bubbles is well aware of that fact because that is exactly why she got herself into the situation at the party in the first place. Faye kept pushing and pushing until she found the right button to mash. So the only thing Bubbles had left as she saw it was a direct physical threat. Then she went home and tried to work out her frustration on some heavy bags. It didn't work, but at no time during any of this did she lose control, or was actually a danger, aside from freak accidents with flying masonry. Given the fact she can put her fist through all that leather and sand, it's quite likely that she pulled her punch on the wall, using only enough to demonstrate her strength.

Also keep in mind that Pintsize didn't have a military grade chassis taken from him. He had an active military weapon. When you are discharged, you keep your kit, but you don't get to walk off with the rifle you carried, or the tank you drove. Momo has stated before that legally speaking, the chassis an AI inhabits is their own. I'm sure there are limits to that, you wouldn't let the AI in charge of a nuclear submarine keep it when they decide to change jobs. Those things run in the millions of dollars.  Who knows how much Bubbles' chassis cost. It's entirely likely that she bought it out with  her accumulated pay when she left the service or was discharged.

As far as people just letting her walk around, she did say that 'better minds have than you have tried' to 'fix' her. The implication is that she has seen a robo psychiatrist sometime in the past at least. While I imagine Bubbles was less than open and cooperative dealing with them, they didn't judge her to be a danger to herself or others at least.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: J on 17 Oct 2015, 05:57
I think people are overstating her danger by quite a bit. She did not hit Faye. She did not miss by accident. She was sending a clear warning to someone who doesn't take verbal or non verbal clues or requests to leave her alone. Bubbles is well aware of that fact because that is exactly why she got herself into the situation at the party in the first place. Faye kept pushing and pushing until she found the right button to mash. So the only thing Bubbles had left as she saw it was a direct physical threat.

i'm sure the fact that bubbles was only threatening to murder faye, rather than actually murdering her will be of great comfort to whomever has to pay for the damage she did to their wall.


Then she went home and tried to work out her frustration on some heavy bags. It didn't work, but at no time during any of this did she lose control, or was actually a danger, aside from freak accidents with flying masonry. Given the fact she can put her fist through all that leather and sand, it's quite likely that she pulled her punch on the wall, using only enough to demonstrate her strength.

i'm fully willing to give her the benefit of the doubt that she wasn't actually trying to hurt faye; and that she keeps her fists properly sighted in and calibrated, so the chance of killing her accidentally was minimal. but the fact remains that her answer to the question "How do I get this annoying person to leave me alone" was "Attempt to terrify them with threats of physical violence!".

this is not the behavior of a responsible & fully rational person.


Also keep in mind that Pintsize didn't have a military grade chassis taken from him. He had an active military weapon.

actually, if i recall correctly, they had to be talked out of just confiscating the whole body, & settled for just taking the laser as a reasonable compromise.

actually, the fact that she's driving around in a military chassis is basically irrelevant; if she were behaving this way in a powerful industrial machine, it would be just as bad.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: cesium133 on 17 Oct 2015, 07:03
"My sex life?  Yes, yes, I've got top men working on it as we speak."

well it's either that, or you handle everything yourself.

"My sex life is a DIY project."
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 17 Oct 2015, 07:05
i'm fully willing to give her the benefit of the doubt that she wasn't actually trying to hurt faye; and that she keeps her fists properly sighted in and calibrated, so the chance of killing her accidentally was minimal. but the fact remains that her answer to the question "How do I get this annoying person to leave me alone" was "Attempt to terrify them with threats of physical violence!".

this is not the behavior of a responsible & fully rational person.

Perhaps you missed all the comics and where I talked about how Bubbles has been trying for a while to get Faye to leave her alone, all of which have failed. 'Subtle' just doesn't work on Faye. Neither did directly saying it to her face. Even trying to walk away from the situation that was causing her so much distress wasn't enough to get Faye to go away. I'm not saying she's fully rational. If she was she wouldn't be suffering so much. And honestly, who really is? Everyone has their baggage to carry. I'm saying that Bubbles is actually responsible and in control, and not a significant danger to other people unless she chooses to be. And she has consistently chosen not to be, including when she had to use physical violence to get her point across.

And a wall is a lot easier to repair than smashing Faye's face.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: J on 17 Oct 2015, 08:11
help me out here; am i completely misunderstanding your point, or are you saying that it's ok to use threats of physical violence and cause property damage, if someone is sufficiently annoying?



Subtle' just doesn't work on Faye. Neither did directly saying it to her face. Even trying to walk away from the situation that was causing her so much distress was enough to get Faye to go away.

ok, subtle doesn't work. fine. how about telling their mutual employer "The new girl won't stop pestering me with personal questions, please tell her to mind her own business." or maybe just ignore any non-work related conversation attempts. or just don't show up at the party. hell, even if we're just talking about this particular incident; bubbles has a running speed of 30 kliks, she can easily remove herself from the situation without damaging innocent masonry.

because even if bubbles is fully in control of her actions, that doesn't change the fact that she's causing property damage and threatening to murder someone who isn't just not threatening her, but is completely incapable of threatening her. all that would mean is that she either couldn't see any of the other options available to her, or that she could see them, and chose that one as being preferable.


so imagine this: if i were a person who carried a handgun on a daily basis, and someone i didn't like wouldn't stop talking to me.  and so i pull out my gun (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_84kR7QWN4) and put a few rounds into the wall 10 inches from their head. should i be allowed to keep that gun?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Neko_Ali on 17 Oct 2015, 08:22
Well first of all, Faye is capable of harming Bubbles emotionally, just not as easily physically. Nor am I saying it's okay or acceptable to harm or threaten to harm someone. But yes, sometimes some people just don't get the hint unless you go to extreme measures when everything else has failed. Also emotional distress will cause people to act out in ways they normally wouldn't. Should we lock up everyone who loses their temper because they could be violent? If that was the case, Faye should have been locked up long ago. She frequently would use threats and violence to get her way. People seem to be reacting more strongly about Bubble's punch because she's 'big and scary military robot' which is exactly how Bubbles thinks that people consider her.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: ReindeerFlotilla on 17 Oct 2015, 09:37
ok, subtle doesn't work. fine. how about telling their mutual employer "The new girl won't stop pestering me with personal questions, please tell her to mind her own business." or maybe just ignore any non-work related conversation attempts. or just don't show up at the party. hell, even if we're just talking about this particular incident; bubbles has a running speed of 30 kliks, she can easily remove herself from the situation without damaging innocent masonry.

because even if bubbles is fully in control of her actions, that doesn't change the fact that she's causing property damage and threatening to murder someone who isn't just not threatening her, but is completely incapable of threatening her. all that would mean is that she either couldn't see any of the other options available to her, or that she could see them, and chose that one as being preferable.


so imagine this: if i were a person who carried a handgun on a daily basis, and someone i didn't like wouldn't stop talking to me.  and so i pull out my gun (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_84kR7QWN4) and put a few rounds into the wall 10 inches from their head. should i be allowed to keep that gun?

Rules of fiction. Show, don't tell. Make it dynamic.

Remember when Pintsize was armed with military grade laser, caused wanton property damage, and Dora assaulted a federal agent?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: sitnspin on 17 Oct 2015, 09:37
help me out here; am i completely misunderstanding your point, or are you saying that it's ok to use threats of physical violence and cause property damage, if someone is sufficiently annoying?

Annoying is not the issue, psychological harm is the issue. Continuing to pressure someone who is under considerable psychological distress is more than just "annoying". Are threats of violence socially acceptable in most instances? No, but psychological harm is a real thing and a person in within their rights, in my opinion, to defend themselves from it, even when that harm is unintentional.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: J on 17 Oct 2015, 10:02
if we have reason to believe that further loss of temper may cause them to act violently, then i'm pretty sure we do lock them up. whether or not they would 'normally' act that way is basically irrelevant.

secondly, 'all else' has not failed; the argument that because subtlety hasn't worked, 'extreme measures' are necessary is invalid, because it presupposes that there is nothing between "I'm leaving." and "BUBS SMASH!". there are multiple avenues of recourse that have yet been unexplored.


but lets break the situation down:

1) you have an AI housed in a weaponized combat-chasis, who is suffering from emotional instability & psychological illness.

2) said AI who can be driven into a wall-smashing rage by the combination of an annoying coworker and a brief, uncomfortable social situation.

3) said AI either could not recognize that she had multiple non-smashy options available to her (in which case, she was irrational due to her emotional instability, and thus unpredictable), or could do so and consciously chose to smash a wall as her most preferred option (in which case, she is fully responsible for her actions).

4) said AI claims to have been resistant to previous attempts at rehabilitative therapy.


my solution to this is that she be removed form the combat-chasis & moved into something less dangerous. her original to be held in custody pending successful rehabilitative therapy. ie: she can have it back, once she can be reasonably expected to use it responsibly.

what would your solution be?


 Warning - while you were typing 2 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: J on 17 Oct 2015, 10:21
Rules of fiction. Show, don't tell. Make it dynamic.

i understand that concept, but don't know how it relates to the post you quoted.

Remember when Pintsize was armed with military grade laser, caused wanton property damage, and Dora assaulted a federal agent?

i do remember that, and referenced it in some of my earlier posts in order to draw parallels with the current situation. in both cases, an unpredictable AI was in possession of dangerous military hardware & caused property damage with it.


Annoying is not the issue, psychological harm is the issue. Continuing to pressure someone who is under considerable psychological distress is more than just "annoying". Are threats of violence socially acceptable in most instances? No, but psychological harm is a real thing and a person in within their rights, in my opinion, to defend themselves from it, even when that harm is unintentional.

ok, granted. however, the issue is not whether or not psychological harm is a real thing, or whether or not a person has the right to defend themselves from it. the issue is whether or not bubbles can be trusted to consistently employ appropriate defenses against said harm.

if hannelore stuck a gun into the face of everyone who tried to shake her hand, we wouldn't say that it's ok because she has the right to defend herself psychologically. we'd say that she lacks the judgement necessary to be a responsible gun owner, and that someone should take that thing away from her.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: sitnspin on 17 Oct 2015, 11:51
I find punching a wall and brandishing a firearm to be completely incomparable, even for someone as strong as Bubbles. She did not hurt anyone. She just made herself crystal clear.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 17 Oct 2015, 12:18
You find them different, but to me the parallel is a close one. It's taking lethal machinery out and demonstrating willingness to use it. It causes mortal fear and is meant to.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Reaver on 17 Oct 2015, 13:35
Faye admits to throwing Bubbles in the pool hoping she'd float, what Faye needs to do is fix her own issues, and not go trying to shove people into pools to try and force them to fix their problems faster than she is fixing her own 8I

And as I said already, Faye has no tact, no light touch, all she does is sorta push something till it fits in the hole, which might work for some, but it's clearly not working for Bubbles, so the little southern belle could kindly step off and stop pushing  an issue that really...is not her business .

She is not friends with Bubbles, just because she WORKS with Bubbles doesn't mean they are friends, just because Faye sees herself in Bubbles doesn't mean she has a right to force herself into her life.



Also glancing at the pole, it's almost laughable to expect Bubbles to break down crying and spill the whole story to Faye because she calls her, her friend :P
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 17 Oct 2015, 13:53
Also glancing at the poll, it's almost laughable to expect Bubbles to break down crying and spill the whole story to Faye because she calls her, her friend :P
After Friday, it seems at least possible. Hardly ridiculous.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Kugai on 17 Oct 2015, 13:56
I suspect that Faye just might be the one that gets Bubbles to open up in the end.  Even if it's only to her or to one of the others.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: aphanisis81 on 17 Oct 2015, 14:03
Remember when this strip was about people and interpersonal relationships instead of emo Blade Runner extras? That was awesome. If this week is any indication, it's now a 1:4 ratio, respectively.

Are you suggesting that Bubbles isn't a person?

It's been well over 24 hours, and I still have no idea how to answer this.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 17 Oct 2015, 14:36
Remember when this strip was about people and interpersonal relationships instead of emo Blade Runner extras? That was awesome. If this week is any indication, it's now a 1:4 ratio, respectively.

Are you suggesting that Bubbles isn't a person?

It's been well over 24 hours, and I still have no idea how to answer this.

Try to answer it from an in-universe perspective. Do you consider Bubbles a 'person' - a fully realised being with strengths, weaknesses, quirks and flaws just like any human or do you think that, in the end, Faye is dealing with misaligned machinery and/or corrupted software in a military combat drone?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 17 Oct 2015, 14:45
a fully realised being with strengths, weaknesses, quirks and flaws just like any human
I would consider her all of those things, but does being all of those things make her a person?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: BenRG on 17 Oct 2015, 15:01
a fully realised being with strengths, weaknesses, quirks and flaws just like any human
I would consider her all of those things, but does being all of those things make her a person?

To me, yes. 'Person' (as least to me) meaning 'something that has the complexity, autonomy and self-identity similar to that of a human on top of sapience and sentience.

It's risky to use 'like a human' as a defining characteristic but, really, it's the only solid reference template we've got right now.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 17 Oct 2015, 15:03
By that definition, are all humans people?

(I know technically the proper pluralization would be "persons", but...ugh, that word never looks right.)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 17 Oct 2015, 15:41
I prefer to assume that all members of the species Homo sapiens are people, because the alternative is a nasty can of worms that I would rather not open.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: WareWolf on 17 Oct 2015, 15:45
if we have reason to believe that further loss of temper may cause them to act violently, then i'm pretty sure we do lock them up. whether or not they would 'normally' act that way is basically irrelevant.

secondly, 'all else' has not failed; the argument that because subtlety hasn't worked, 'extreme measures' are necessary is invalid, because it presupposes that there is nothing between "I'm leaving." and "BUBS SMASH!". there are multiple avenues of recourse that have yet been unexplored.


but lets break the situation down:

1) you have an AI housed in a weaponized combat-chasis, who is suffering from emotional instability & psychological illness.

2) said AI who can be driven into a wall-smashing rage by the combination of an annoying coworker and a brief, uncomfortable social situation.

3) said AI either could not recognize that she had multiple non-smashy options available to her (in which case, she was irrational due to her emotional instability, and thus unpredictable), or could do so and consciously chose to smash a wall as her most preferred option (in which case, she is fully responsible for her actions).

4) said AI claims to have been resistant to previous attempts at rehabilitative therapy.


my solution to this is that she be removed form the combat-chasis & moved into something less dangerous. her original to be held in custody pending successful rehabilitative therapy. ie: she can have it back, once she can be reasonably expected to use it responsibly.

what would your solution be?


 Warning - while you were typing 2 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.

That would probably be the preferred official response, but it's highly probable the Powers That Be don't know just how bad Bubbles has it. She is living underground, after all. The plot question now is, can Faye et., al. get her into a space where the PTB don't have to rip her out of her body against her will  (doing god knows what additional psychological damage)?

Here's another question...how much weaponry have they ALREADY taken off of her to return her to civilian life?

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 17 Oct 2015, 15:46
I'd think you can say that all people are humans, or that all people have certain characteristics. Both definitions have their disadvantages, the former rejects non-humans, the latter rejects some humans, but opens the door to many more.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Tova on 17 Oct 2015, 16:13
I don't understand this entire argument, which appears to boil down to: "Someone in the comic did something that is not okay and is not 100% rational."

I am shocked. Shocked, I say.

One side of the argument started with: "I think people are overstating her danger by quite a bit."
And the other: "This behaviour is not okay."

These are not contradictory viewpoints.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 17 Oct 2015, 16:31
Well said.
----
If Bubbles is like many carbon-based combat veterans she needs someone with the common experience and credibility of another veteran to reach her. The robot support group might be a total failure, for example.
----
"Show me how you act, and I will tell you what you believe". If you were in the QC universe, would you treat Momo as an information appliance or as a person? If you treat her as a person then you've acknowledged her personhood even though it's obvious she's a different species from you.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 17 Oct 2015, 16:44
I'd treat her as I'd treat a human.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: St.Clair on 17 Oct 2015, 18:13
I believe I understand your intent, but...
Taken literally, that, like many (mis)applications of the Golden Rule, might be a mistake.
She's not human.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: mustang6172 on 17 Oct 2015, 19:11
Well said.
----
If Bubbles is like many carbon-based combat veterans she needs someone with the common experience and credibility of another veteran to reach her. The robot support group might be a total failure, for example.
----
"Show me how you act, and I will tell you what you believe". If you were in the QC universe, would you treat Momo as an information appliance or as a person? If you treat her as a person then you've acknowledged her personhood even though it's obvious she's a different species from you.

What do the forum rules say I have to treat Momo as?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 17 Oct 2015, 20:14
I believe I understand your intent, but...
Taken literally, that, like many (mis)applications of the Golden Rule, might be a mistake.
She's not human.
So? I made no claim that she was, just that I'd treat her the same as I'd treat a human.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Tova on 17 Oct 2015, 20:19
I believe I understand your intent, but...
Taken literally, that, like many (mis)applications of the Golden Rule, might be a mistake.
She's not human.

That is fair enough, she's not; but I believe that the gist of what people are trying to say (as I'm sure you realise) is that the way you would treat an AI in the QC universe would resemble the way you'd treat a human far more closely than the way you'd treat an appliance.

What do the forum rules say I have to treat Momo as?

I don't believe the forum rules have much to say on the topic of how to behave during hypothetical meetings betweeen forum members and fictional characters within the QC universe.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Perfectly Reasonable on 17 Oct 2015, 22:30
I remember one of the Mods saying once that if sapient lobsters joined the forum, he expected them to be treated with decency and respect. (Not a lobster myself, but I applauded.)
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: St.Clair on 17 Oct 2015, 23:10
I believe I understand your intent, but...
Taken literally, that, like many (mis)applications of the Golden Rule, might be a mistake.
She's not human.
So? I made no claim that she was, just that I'd treat her the same as I'd treat a human.
Including, e.g., fussing over her when she doesn't eat or sleep?  Even though that's normal for her?

We're not very good at not projecting our own anthropocentric biases onto other forms of intelligence (fictional only, so far) (that we know of).
I submit that in some circumstances, treating a nonhuman intelligence as if it was human may be (pick one or more) unwise, discourteous, or downright dangerous, for one or both of you.
It is possible to be respectful of another intelligent being - indeed, it may actually be more so - without assuming that they are just like yourself.

In case I'm still not getting through:
Is there a type or style of food of which you're particularly fond?  Do you automatically assume, until proven otherwise, that everyone you meet enjoys the same?  Would you order it for them (and yourself) without asking first what they would prefer?  Would you dismiss statements to the contrary - ie, "Come on, everyone likes _____, you just haven't had it prepared right."?


A (IMO dismayingly) large number of stories about artificial beings start with the unquestioned premise that our creations will admire us and seek to emulate us.  I believe that this assumption - that of course our children, biological and otherwise, will want to be just like us - is the height of arrogance and chauvinism.  Of course our own life choices, beliefs, etc, are the ones that any rational being would choose to adopt... of course we are the examples they would want to follow and make themselves into good little clones of...
(Ask a random sampling of parents, and/or their children, how well that worked out for them.)
I think at this point, I'd be much more interested in a non-crazy, non-evil, non-strawman version of TNG's Lore that said "**** you, Dad - I'm not going to try to 'become more human' to please and validate you, I'm gonna go off and live my own life, figure out who and what I want to be."  Bonus points if what they ended up as didn't look or act anything like a human in makeup or rubber forehead.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Tova on 18 Oct 2015, 03:54
I remember one of the Mods saying once that if sapient lobsters joined the forum, he expected them to be treated with decency and respect. (Not a lobster myself, but I applauded.)

On the internet, nobody knows you're a sapient lobster.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 18 Oct 2015, 05:33
I believe I understand your intent, but...
Taken literally, that, like many (mis)applications of the Golden Rule, might be a mistake.
She's not human.
So? I made no claim that she was, just that I'd treat her the same as I'd treat a human.
Including, e.g., fussing over her when she doesn't eat or sleep?  Even though that's normal for her?

We're not very good at not projecting our own anthropocentric biases onto other forms of intelligence (fictional only, so far) (that we know of).
I submit that in some circumstances, treating a nonhuman intelligence as if it was human may be (pick one or more) unwise, discourteous, or downright dangerous, for one or both of you.
It is possible to be respectful of another intelligent being - indeed, it may actually be more so - without assuming that they are just like yourself.

In case I'm still not getting through:
Is there a type or style of food of which you're particularly fond?  Do you automatically assume, until proven otherwise, that everyone you meet enjoys the same?  Would you order it for them (and yourself) without asking first what they would prefer?  Would you dismiss statements to the contrary - ie, "Come on, everyone likes _____, you just haven't had it prepared right."?


A (IMO dismayingly) large number of stories about artificial beings start with the unquestioned premise that our creations will admire us and seek to emulate us.  I believe that this assumption - that of course our children, biological and otherwise, will want to be just like us - is the height of arrogance and chauvinism.  Of course our own life choices, beliefs, etc, are the ones that any rational being would choose to adopt... of course we are the examples they would want to follow and make themselves into good little clones of...
(Ask a random sampling of parents, and/or their children, how well that worked out for them.)
I think at this point, I'd be much more interested in a non-crazy, non-evil, non-strawman version of TNG's Lore that said "**** you, Dad - I'm not going to try to 'become more human' to please and validate you, I'm gonna go off and live my own life, figure out who and what I want to be."  Bonus points if what they ended up as didn't look or act anything like a human in makeup or rubber forehead.

Look, I'm not sure who you are arguing with here, but most of us seem to be trying to say that we'd treat an AI with the same level of respect that we'd treat a human, not that we'd assume they have all the same needs and wants as a biological organism.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 18 Oct 2015, 06:58
What Zeb said. Treating someone like a human simply means treating them with dignity and respect.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 18 Oct 2015, 09:14
Which to me entail acknowledging their differences, though as a distant second after acknowledging all we have in common.

This is getting interesting. Would a thread in RELATE or DISCUSS about how we would interact with QC-type robots be worthwhile?
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Method of Madness on 18 Oct 2015, 09:15
Which to me entail acknowledging their differences, though as a distant second after acknowledging all we have in common.
Which 100% applies to humans as well!
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Zebediah on 18 Oct 2015, 09:27
And, to bring this back around to the comic - I think everyone there was treating Bubbles with the same amount of respect  they would treat anyone else they had just met. Which in the case of Faye, May and Pintsize means not very much.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Morituri on 18 Oct 2015, 11:10
Pinnochio Syndrome. (warning:  Allthetropes link)  http://allthetropes.wikia.com/wiki/Pinocchio_Syndrome (http://allthetropes.wikia.com/wiki/Pinocchio_Syndrome)

Is when someone "wants to be a real boy" or whatever, having mistaken himself for something that isn't real. 

IMO, it's a fallacy.  If someone isn't "real", then they could not be thinking about whether they were real or not.  And if someone isn't "real" then there's nothing for a word like "want" in the phrase "want to be a real boy" to mean. 

It doesn't stop it from happening in reality though.  You know what you spend most of your time doing when you teach sex-ed classes for early teenagers?  You spend most of your time reassuring them that they're normal.  Because they're just scared to death that "normal" people don't have this fantasy or that fetish or feel same-sex attraction or whatever, and that they're some kind of FREAK because they do - and no, they're really, really not.  And they don't want to be FREAKS, they want to be "a real boy" - or "a real girl" - or know that they're not the only one who doesn't feel like "boy" or "girl" are the right or only categories, or whatever.  I spend most of my volunteer time just saying, "Nope, that's normal."  Or "Yeah, that's kind of lonely but there's nothing wrong with it and it happens to lots of people," or "Oh, well if that doesn't work for you here's how some other folks with that same difficulty deal with it...."  And the reassuring them that all this diversity is in fact normal, is more important than anything I can teach them about how to deal with their particular combination. 

People who are different in any way fear that they aren't "real" or "normal" or whatever.  I have no doubt that the silicon-vs-protein split will continue to get the same kind of reaction.  In fact I'd consider the absence of that reaction to be more the sign of a genuine freak.

Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: jwhouk on 18 Oct 2015, 17:16
We had an AI Rights thread at one point, I think? Maybe the discussion should head over there.
Title: Re: WCDT Strips 3066 to 3070 (12th - 16th October 2015)
Post by: Shjade on 19 Oct 2015, 16:06
Welp!  I guess Jeph can't write an introvert who is content to be an introvert, or keep a character nice and static.

I gave him way too much credit.

Just a note on writing: static characters are, more or less, plot contrivances. If a character is static, it's generally due to 1) the character not being important enough to explore beyond their surface level in the text, 2) the character not being interesting enough for same, 3) character is being used to make a point (contrasting with another character's ability to grow and change, for instance), or 4) the writer's incapable of crafting better characters.

If you're going to take the time to focus on a character (as is occurring here with Bubbles), chances are that character isn't going to be static, or else you're probably wasting everyone's time.