THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)
		Fun Stuff => MAKE => Topic started by: edscoble on 10 Apr 2006, 18:38
		
			
			- 
				Has anyone ever tried to experience making image like this? v
 
 (http://static.flickr.com/45/126677504_3eeb42020e.jpg)
 
 the trick is this, it's not a miniature tube carriage, it's in fact a real London tube carriage, but with a few adjustment, you can make it look like you're looking at a model.
- 
				eh, the arial view ones look much better.
			
- 
				2 hours down the drain in Photoshop at 3am in the morning, and still not finished it, thank lad, you do really know how to cut the core of me.
			
- 
				Ha HA! put that in your fife and smoke it, mr "this freakin' close to speaking german"!
			
- 
				When you explain what's really going on in that picture I get that distant and detached feeling I get in my head when I have the flu.
			
- 
				looks like a small depth of field to me....but i guess it would seem like a model or something to those who dont know much about photography.
 
 but i do like the picture nonetheless.
- 
				it's a bit hard to add a very small dept of field because when you took photos of miniature thing, you can tell immediately it's a miniature thing, i start off by actually taking a photos of an deep-level tube model below v
 
 (http://static.flickr.com/43/125731070_353b5bc111.jpg)
 
 and Trollstormur, don't be so bloody rude.
- 
				well I for one am impressed.
			
- 
				Disirregardless of what it looks like, it looks cool.
			
- 
				[something grammatically correct that I couldn't find through a forum search] 
 *swoon*
 
 Disirregardless 
 Grrrrrrrrr.
 
 
 Alack, I am torn!
- 
				Ah, but when I say disirregardless, I'm doing it to make fun of people who say irregardless.  I am fully aware that the correct word is regardless.
			
- 
				I concur with Scandanavian War Machine. 
 
 Plus I just see a ton of blur tool in Photoshop.
 
 But it's still nifty.
 :)