Whatever happened to de la Rocha's solo album, anyway?
In my opinion their first album was overshadowed musically and lyrically (basically overall) by their other two albums, especially Battle of Los Angeles.
I can't imagine what he's been doing with all this time. He's not exactly been in the public eye either. I wonder if he's been concerned with family matters.
Unfortunately, there's no possible way I can see the RATM reunion being anything other than disappointing. What's the purpose of it?
HEY REVOLVER! DON'T MOTHERS MAKE GOOD FATHERS? REVOLVER!. . . REVOLVER?. . . REVOLVER!!!!!!![/size][/i]
I allways imagined him fighting capitalist pigs in some jungle in South America.
Some how, I wish that was true.
Personally, I prefer:TURN ON THA RADIO. NA, FUCK IT, TURN IT OFF. FEAR IS YOUR ONLY GUARD ON THA RADIO. NAH, FUCK IT, TURN IT OFF.[/i]
That's the bit I don't understand. Questionable dress sense aside, RATM are far more nu-metal than SOAD.
I have to say that Zach's lyrics in the first album were way obtuse.
I have to say that Zach's lyrics in the first album were way obtuse.
What, you mean they weren't immediately apparent on first listen?
Damn. That must suck, huh.
You mean the album that they didn't write any of the songs for? With the good songs that Rick Rubin had to coax them into covering?
Yeah, thats pretty dang versatile.
So you thought 'Maggie's Farm' and 'Beautiful World' were RATM originals?
Seriously, what do they teach you kids at MTV these days?
Tsk Tsk (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renegades_(album))!
I'd say that it's mainly because RATM never got unfairly lumped in with nu-metal like SOAD.
Also, seriously, what's with the hate for Audioslave? They don't compare to Rage OR Soundgarden, but they're not horrible. Their first album was good and their second and third were decent with some good tunes. (They keep choosing horrible singles, though)