THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Fun Stuff => BAND => Topic started by: alonelyargonaut on 17 May 2007, 19:30

Title: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: alonelyargonaut on 17 May 2007, 19:30
Wow.  I dunno I realized why I dislike pitchfork today.  Minus the given fact that they are pretentious snobs (which is a given).

this line:

"Their record is as hard to get worked up about as it is easy to like."

talking about Young Galaxy who I have very little ties to as I heard them only the first time today.  So it isn't like making fun of a band who I am invested in.

If something is easy to like isn't that something to praise?  I dunno.  Let the flaming begin.
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: Johnny C on 17 May 2007, 19:33
Hey, this thread. I didn't miss you.
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: Gryff on 17 May 2007, 19:39
Please nobody post in here.

Starting... now.
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: Tyler on 17 May 2007, 19:49
Pitchfork has been crap ever since Seger left.
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: KharBevNor on 17 May 2007, 20:15
Pitchfork? Moer Liek SHITfork! AMIRITE?
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: jeph on 17 May 2007, 20:55
guys have you heard of this band "slint"

which album of their should i get first, tweez or spiderland

 :?
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: Tyler on 17 May 2007, 21:12
seger really added some dynamics to spiderland. the dynamics, man.
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: Gryff on 17 May 2007, 21:15
Oh man, the dynamics.
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: Inlander on 17 May 2007, 21:24
Now there's a name for a band. Are there any bands called the Dynamics? If not, why not?
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: jeph on 17 May 2007, 21:25
guys where can i find more bands with dynamics in their songs

like maybe their songs would start off all quiet and gradually get more and more rockin' loud

that would be awesome
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: Inlander on 17 May 2007, 21:34
I had this wild and totally rockin' idea for song dynamics the other day. Get this: you'd have the verses all quiet, right, but then without warning BAM! The chorus would be really loud. Like, not just loud, but fucking LOUD. And then - this is the crazy part - you'd go back to quiet again for the next verse. So it's, like, quiet, loud, quiet. Man, that's never been done before!
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: jeph on 17 May 2007, 21:45
oh man

i think you just blew my mind

seriously my brain just got a blowjob from the words and concepts you put in that post
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: Gridgm on 18 May 2007, 02:50
guys have you heard of this band "slint"

which album of their should i get first, tweez or spiderland

 :?

i'm gonna go out on a limb here and say the slint EP...what ever you do i wouldn't get spiderland...it's just caving into the peer pressure of these indie kids...and then you wouldn't be indie would you
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: Patrick on 18 May 2007, 06:00
in b4 'in b4'
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: Will on 18 May 2007, 07:28
Dudes, Funhouse
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: ScrambledGregs on 18 May 2007, 08:05
guys where can i find more bands with dynamics in their songs

like maybe their songs would start off all quiet and gradually get more and more rockin' loud

that would be awesome

Have you heard of this band, uhm...Blowing Up in the Air?? Err...Explosions in the Wind?? Shit. Well anyway they're really good. Some online web comic guy kept talking about them and I finally got some of their albums and they're amazing. Dynamics up the wing wong, spilling out the mouth.
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: Misereatur on 18 May 2007, 10:53
16 posts and I still have no idea why this isn't locked yet.
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: Spinless on 18 May 2007, 15:29
Seger's pitchfork review of Funhouse was full of praise, but then again, he DID contribute most of the album, so what do you expect?
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: Valrus on 18 May 2007, 17:25
in b4 'in b4'

in b4tl
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: McTaggart on 18 May 2007, 19:40
you know just ibtl is shorter right?
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: David_Dovey on 18 May 2007, 23:46
Would anybody get it if I abbreviated "ibtl" to "i"?
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: öde on 19 May 2007, 11:00
Who cares.
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: Ben yayayayayayayay on 19 May 2007, 16:52
Who cares?*
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: Valrus on 19 May 2007, 18:33
you know just ibtl is shorter right?

Yeah but KJS used "in b4" so I decided I'd better throw him a bone.

Look what we are talking about here. What does this thread do to people.
Title: Re: Reason Why I Don't Like Pitchfork
Post by: jeph on 19 May 2007, 20:40
GOD you guys

this thread was supposed to be about DYNAMICS

locking this so you hopefully learn your lesson

GOD.